bsCallout
New Member
- Joined
- Dec 21, 2017
- Messages
- 4,278
Essentially, I agree with you. But it works on both sides of the debate and is something I find pretty irritating.
If you pin it on Ole the poor results and performances so far. You have to also give him credit when it’s improved.
However there’s a massive contingent in here, where if it’s poor it’s not Ole’s fault, championship level squad, the board etc a wonder we’re not relegated. But when it’s good it’s 100% down to ole. Also Ole is only manager who can spend £200m on decent players. Jose was this ‘massive failure’ despite outperforming OGS by every metric so far.
It’s mind numbingly dumb, so if you are going to apply that criticism, apply it to both sides.
I agree, however, the majority of posters on here are OleOut, it's relentless, which is the reason for my comment. You can't actually have a discussion with these people, objectively.
Generally OleIn concede not all is perfect, they kind of have to. So there is slightly more room in their point of view for discussion.
I don't actually agree that Jose outperformed on every metric. There are many areas Ole has succeeded. I also don't agree that most deem Jose a massive failure, I think most tend to believe he did OK but was just a toxic personality that we didn't want.
All the threads descend into people just bashing heads against each other, OleIn/OleOut.