Acquire Me
Full Member
Damn it’s a lot of young and angry men in here
My fault. With better I meant winning team.You said 200m is not enough to improve our team. Meanwhile Conte hasn't spent up to that and he's taken Inter from 4th to 1st. Klopp didn't spend up to that when he took Liverpool from 12 th when he met them to 4th. Meanwhile after 200m or 130m tbf.. Ole has taken us from 6th to 9th on course to our lowest point tally in 30 years. So unlike Klopp and Conte we've spent money and regressed.
My fault. With better I meant winning team.
It is true we are on course. But you seem to forget or don’t mention why. And I’m not talking about manager. Do you think our squad is good enough? And put injuries to our ”best” players and you can see the reason. For example. You Saw what happened to City when Laporte went down? They started dropping points. Despite great manager if you loose important players that affects you. And ManCity players are miles infront of us in terms of quality, still dropping points. Would it help sacking Guardiola? The answer is that it is not always manager that is fault for some things.
Why ? We are struggling with him at a role he's had a little experience with before, DOF is way too important for him to have a job. This ain't a charity, if he is sacked as manager then he should not be linked with the club in any serious professional capacity anymore.
Damn it’s a lot of young and angry men in here
Damn it’s a lot of young and angry men in here
My fault. With better I meant winning team.
It is true we are on course. But you seem to forget or don’t mention why. And I’m not talking about manager. Do you think our squad is good enough? And put injuries to our ”best” players and you can see the reason. For example. You Saw what happened to City when Laporte went down? They started dropping points. Despite great manager if you loose important players that affects you. And ManCity players are miles infront of us in terms of quality, still dropping points. Would it help sacking Guardiola? The answer is that it is not always manager that is fault for some things.
200m (we should not count new arrival though he played one game) isn’t enough in modern football to make this team better. We know it takes more. We needed to upgrade our defenders and I think we’ve done it well. Would I have done the same thing? Not sure, because of no midfield. But I completly understand Solskjaer for addresing defenders first.
For me, problem is quality of the players. Sure, Solskjaer has done some misstakes, but we have so many avarege players that no other manager would come in and be pleased. Instead they would say : I need money for new players because lot of players in this group don’t have what it takes.
Now that you mention them. I would have given VanGal more time.
Congratulations! Not a single thing in your post addressed what we where talking about
That angry fella who thinks he is enigma asked about credentials. I tried to explain to him that it’s not all about your cv of past credentials. Sometimes people actually look at your studies, and football people tend to do that. You see. When clubs hire managers or coaches, they do not only look at what you have done in the past experience. They also look at your studies and philosophies. That’s why they conduct an interview, and in this case the poster thought his own parameters are the most important ones. He usually do..
He then asked on why Utd hired Ole, from that tin pot league. Having failed everything in his management career. And I said.
Probably the same reason Chelsea hired Lampard. Why Napoli hired Gattusso ( he then came back with what Gattussi did at Milan, but forgot Allegri, who has the credentials to suit his own parameters) The same reason Arsenal hired Arteta. And the same reason Real hired Zidane.
They all know the clubs, and the clubs know them.
He then came back with Zidane didn’t fail at Cardiff and in a tin pot league. And I responded. No, he failed in secunda B with a very talented squad.
You see. No one was comparing anyone. Saying one was better than the other etc. It was just about why clubs hire starting out managers.
( This is the point of the post The one Who thinks he is enigma will focus on..
“Ole isn’t just starting out”. No he isn’t! He only has experience of dealing with crazy club owners and building club structures. He also has experience building squads and have done very well in Europe with them.)
And if people want to criticize Ole for being a family man and going back to Molde, that is fine by me. And if they want to ridicule themself saying he didn’t do well there, that is fine also.
I see several of your tin foil hat friends made the assumption somehow Ole and Zidane got compared. But I really have no answer for that.
I just know players enjoy working with both.
How does a discussion like this turn into Zidane vs Ole. Ole is not fit to laze Zidane’s boots etc.
What is wrong with you people?
I don’t know how many threads are being derailed in this fashion, but there is quite a few.
Does the moderators moderate at all?
It’s making this place look like muppet show. And
If I was visiting from another club, I would laugh my glory hunting ass off..
Really. It’s embarrassing.
Sorry for the bolded part mate, but I could not think of a better analogy.Thanks for that image.
If the job was available and Poch and Ole were the candidates, nobody, probably not even Ole's family would go for Ole to get the job based on their Managerial CV's, that's not open to debate but that isn't the situation.
I know most like to think of the owners/CEO as incompetents but i'd hazard a guess that it was not only the winning run that got Ole the Gig full-time just as much it would have been his plans/vision of the club in the future, why bin that off just we're having a foreseen wobble just because the flavour of the month is available?
Fresh and new doesn't guarantee anything, if it did Managers would be on monthly contracts.
It'll put him in good stead for working with Ed Woodward then if he gets the job.
Woodward has many faults. Hiring managers who don't suit the club or aren't good enough are his biggest ones but no one can accuse him of not backing the managers in the transfer market and that's enough for a good manager to forget about what's happening further up the ladder and actually get us back in contention again.
The club owners make transfer funds available, not Woodward.
A historically tough trip? What? Get out of here! So this chelsea side with Frank managing is a tougher proposition than the title winning sides Jose had there?£200 million may not be enough to build a title challenging side, but it's certainly enough to improve a squad that finished second six months before Ole's arrival and came within a whisker of finishing in the top four the following season.
Now we find ourselves in 9th position with a historically tough trip to Stamford Bridge next up. It doesn't look good does it?
A historically tough trip? What? Get out of here! So this chelsea side with Frank managing is a tougher proposition than the title winning sides Jose had there?
Jaypers. There's hyperbole, and then there's this!
Guarantee you Ole is in charge come AugustHe has to be gone by the summer. Why waste another year
A historically tough trip? What? Get out of here! So this chelsea side with Frank managing is a tougher proposition than the title winning sides Jose had there?
Jaypers. There's hyperbole, and then there's this!
Woodward is the club's bean counter so he would have the final say on whether the funds would be released or not.
Probably not, but the current Chelsea side still sits above us in the table with or without Jose. Losing tomorrow night all but ends our CL hopes.
Since 2002, our record at Stamford Bridge is 14 losses, 8 draws and 2 wins.
Not saying he won't but he shouldn't be. He has done terribly. And we will be wasting another season with the same excusesGuarantee you Ole is in charge come August
Totally agree about the glazers and Ed are fecked in the head and don't understand footballNot saying he won't but he shouldn't be. He has done terribly. And we will be wasting another season with the same excuses
At this point, it's safe to say he won't.No one knows whether Ole will be successful or not.
You're correct in terms of winning trophies.At this point, it's safe to say he won't.
Keep him.
There's absolutely no point ripping everything up and starting all over again from scratch. No one knows whether Ole will be successful or not. However the same can be said of Pochettino. What happens if Pochettino comes 6th in his first season. Do we sack him and appoint someone like Gary Neville who gets the club?
Ole is building a young talented squad and I feel he should get another summer to fill the gaps in the squad. When he finally leaves, he will leave us with a much better squad compared to the mess of a squad he inherited.
I wonder how many times he will use the phrase "the boys" in his post-match interview tomorrow when we get smashed by Chelsea? With Spurs winning today and us now a virtually mid-table team (9th currently), how the feck is he still the manager....the mind boggles
You're correct in terms of winning trophies.
However, I think Ole is doing well developing the squad with the type of players we're going after. At this stage, with no DoF in place, recruitment is key and I trust Ole with that.
Yes, because football in real life is not like football manager and things take time.He’s building a talented squad, yet we have to wait until next season and him to “fill gaps” to see any progress whatsoever, what kind of horseshite is that?
Keep him.
There's absolutely no point ripping everything up and starting all over again from scratch. No one knows whether Ole will be successful or not. However the same can be said of Pochettino. What happens if Pochettino comes 6th in his first season. Do we sack him and appoint someone like Gary Neville who gets the club?
Ole is building a young talented squad and I feel he should get another summer to fill the gaps in the squad. When he finally leaves, he will leave us with a much better squad compared to the mess of a squad he inherited.
Keep him.
There's absolutely no point ripping everything up and starting all over again from scratch. No one knows whether Ole will be successful or not. However the same can be said of Pochettino. What happens if Pochettino comes 6th in his first season. Do we sack him and appoint someone like Gary Neville who gets the club?
Ole is building a young talented squad and I feel he should get another summer to fill the gaps in the squad. When he finally leaves, he will leave us with a much better squad compared to the mess of a squad he inherited.
We've appointed capable managers in the past, serial winners in LVG and Mourinho and still got nowhere near winning a major trophy. These managers failed because they didn't understand the club. I think Ole does based the type/age of players that we are going after.You could have the best players in the world but without a capable manager in place it wont equal success. Ole seems to get a lot of credit in the transfer market but James is looking like a squad player at best, Maguire hasn't looked like a 80m defender, AWB has been the best signing thus far hes great defensively but looks a bit lost going forward.
Not exactly been great we're one point above Burnley, behind the likes of Sheff United and Everton in the league sitting in 9th, its a joke and given the run at the back end of last season doesn't deserve anymore time.