I am genuinely curious as to why, of all the managers that we've had since the great man left, that Ole is the hill that so many of our fans choose to die on.
A lot of people have pointed to his transfers as some kind of strong point, but for a bit of comparison let's look at Jose. I am in no way a fan of Jose, and indeed I was one of the most vocal Jose out posters when I felt his time here came to an end. James, Maguire and AWB. Dan James, fair enough, we were far more likely to get a Perisic or Willian than him, but then he was recommended to us by Giggs, he wasn't some find by our scouting team. Jose wanted Maguire last year, and AWB, arguably the most defensively accomplished RB in the league, he seems like exactly the kind of player Jose would have wanted (Lest we forget his two defensive signings for us were both young players, before anyone mentions the age argument). Looked at from this angle, then at least two of the three transfers Ole is praised for are players the miserable one would have wanted as well.
The style of football is genuinely not any better than under any of the previous managers. For me at least, I don't see any signs of what he's trying to do. During the initial few games when he came in I thought that was the style of football he was trying to implement, but then after an entire summer with the team, our style of play couldn't be further from that, and just overall we look aimless. As I said in the Arsenal post match thread, we're just a nothing team. We don't really try to do anything in particular on the field, it's just sort of aimless scrimmaging and hoping for a moment of magic.
Then there's the issue of the board. Sure, our board have their issues, certainly, but the board had issues when the previous managers were around as well. Didn't we all agree that those managers were crap during their time here, in addition to the board being crap? How then, has it become the case with Ole here that the board is crap, so we don't know what Ole is capable of, and this is all on the board?
"He loves the club/Genuinely cares for the club" Why is this relevant when assessing him as a manager? How many of the most successful managers in the last fifty years have been people who loved the club they were successful at? Perhaps Pep and Zidane, both of whom were exceptional right from the off, but other than them, is this really something we should be considering when looking at what our manager is doing? Certainly I don't think Sir Alex loved United or genuinely cared for United when he came down from Aberdeen.
On paper, there isn't much that needs to be said. Ole has been a manager for around a decade now, and on paper he's the worst/second worst manager we've had in the post SAF era, so it's not like he has any sort of CV for us to point towards.
This has turned into a bit of a ramble, but in the end, from my point of view at least, there's absolutely no reason that OGS should be the manager, of all the managers we've had, that we say we're going to back beyond any shadow of a doubt and see what happens. He's the manager with the most doubt hanging over his head, after all. If we were going to do that, then why didn't we stick with Jose?