LuisNaniencia
Sky Sports called my bluff
As long as we don't add fecking Eric Dier to that list I'm happy.
Think it's more likely to be:
Persic
Morata
Lindelof
Matic
of course yes but he alone wasn't enough, mainly because the likes of Martial were poo. We pretty much needed Martial to play like Alli or Hazard, for us to get top 4 but hey.Lord Zlatan? Big guy, ponytail, scores goals for fun.
Your friend was likely sleep talkingHe should try dembele the france international than perisic..does it take insane money to buy him ?my friends must be joking when saying that perisic is similar to dimaria.
Ultimately its all about whether Mourinho gets the players he wants, not whether certain fans are excited about the players he wants.
The four listed are probably exactly what he's after barring the availability of the likes of Mbappe or the like.
When i say something like this im asked if 'people are allowed opinions' and a few people will harp on about how the manager makes mistakes. Then theyll tell me how a new formation and a few galacticos will make us win the treble.
Im counting down the days till pre-season starts so I can actually see our new players in action.
Why do people often care about how well a player does in a counter attacking situation. Those opportunities appear less often and often reflect that the team has been under pressure.Morata may not score as much as Zlatan but the main difference would be Morata is more dynamic. In many counterattack, zlatan wasn't very useful because he didn't have the speed to get to the other box. This is where Morata will help. He would get pogba mkhi mata martial and rashford performing better
I agree with this. I think goals this season will come more. It seemed the players felt a lot of pressure last season, as of course they will this season, but I think a second year under Mourinho it will be different. Our defense will be even stronger now, and the CDM signing is the most important. Id rather us play a 4-1-3-2 than anything with Rashford and Morata (or whoever we sign as striker) up top.Martial scores and creates from the left, I expect him to bounce back and play more regularly this year. Perisic scored 10 goals last season in case he doesn't. Mata chips in with goals. Mhiki should also settle in a bit better this season.
Pogba should be scoring more of we have a competant midfield and attackers who create space this year.
It's lack of pace on the wings. It slows our game down and makes its harder for us to really finish people off. Bale or Sanchez please. In a perfect world we would sign both.Lack of Quality? You mean to say A 58 m Pound buy martial who scored 17 goals and 11 assists and Mkh and mata lacks quality? No its not lack of quality,its lack of balance due to high work rate and defensive demands which a player like perisic or willianor mane would eaisily fit into but players who lack work rate and engine do not.
Why do people often care about how well a player does in a counter attacking situation. Those opportunities appear less often and often reflect that the team has been under pressure.
What is more important is how well the player does in more normal open scenarios and against parked bus defences.
It's lack of pace on the wings. It slows our game down and makes its harder for us to really finish people off. Bale or Sanchez please. In a perfect world we would sign both.
I know it won't happen but the idea is to have someone with that style of play who will also score goals. I said in a perfect world it would be those two. Unlikely we could even get just one of them, but thats what our game needs. We've been playing with too many playmakers and not enough pace. If the two up top is that insane, then yes you can switch a Mikhi or Mata for the final striker. Ideally for me we would play three at the back, and sign two pacey wingbacks. The other 2 in the midfield would be Pogba, the CDM that we have yet to sign (who forever I was hoping Blind would fill.) Then Mikhi/Mata under Morata(preferably Martial) or whoever the main man lands and Rashford. I personally think that's a pretty hard team to beat. But we aren't too good at picking out talent that isn't over priced. That seems to be Chelsea's, City's, and sometimes Liverpools forte. Which is a shame.you are kidding right? We wouldnt get sanchez here. Fairly sure even city wont get him
Will not solve our goal scoring problems. I'm sure opposition fans would be delighted if these are the only transfers we make.
Probably a Top 4 scrap next season.
News flash, it doesn't and really wouldn't. Who are the goal getters? Just to let you know, the top 2 teams scored 85 + goals. That is what is needed. We have lost, Zlatan and only replaced him with Morata who may not be as good. FYI Spurs front 4/5 in the league read - Kane 29, Alli 18, Son 14, Eriksen 8 (69 total). Chelsea's read - Costa 20, Hazard 16, Pedro 9, Willian 8 (53). Chelsea also got about 11 goals from their defenders etc. I ask you, who are the goalscorers in our team? We would need a complete turnaround of goal scoring form/ability in our squad to mount a title challenge. This isn't Serie A. Pogba scored like 3 league goals last season. Miki about 4. basically this formation relies on a complete leap of faith, which doesn't typically win you titles. Its the Wenger method. We needed another consistent match winner who was ready now. Perisic and Mkhitaryan are both supporting cast players (a Pedro or a Willian) but not match winners themselves. If Chelsea had just Pedro and Willan with Costa, they would come 3rd most likely.
Good post.Just adding players won't solve the goal scoring issue. We scored 49 goals in 2015-16 season, then added Pogba, Mkhitaryan, Zlatan and ended up with only 54 goals. Just adding few more players who scored good number of goals elswhere is not the only solution, there is a good chance that it isn't even the solution. Adding too many players means team will always lack chemistry, new players again needs time to adapt and all that. What we have to change is how we attack, it's to do with with how Jose sets up his team.
For example, Chelsea had the same attack but added Kante, Alonso and few other defenders, their goals in last 3 seasons - 73, 59, 85.
Spurs had the same attack in last 2 league seasons, their goals - 69 and 86. Some of the other players stepped up too.
That's what we should be expecting instead of just signing few more attackers. We should be doing much more to bring the best out of players like Mkhitaryan, Martial, Rashford, Mata who are all better players than what they showed last season. I think you can also look at how Monaco did, they didn't sign any star player or many attackers but they went from being defensive team to all out attacking and their attackers did superbly (along with emergence of Mbappe).
I know it won't happen but the idea is to have someone with that style of play who will also score goals. I said in a perfect world it would be those two. Unlikely we could even get just one of them, but thats what our game needs. We've been playing with too many playmakers and not enough pace. If the two up top is that insane, then yes you can switch a Mikhi or Mata for the final striker. Ideally for me we would play three at the back, and sign two pacey wingbacks. The other 2 in the midfield would be Pogba, the CDM that we have yet to sign (who forever I was hoping Blind would fill.) Then Mikhi/Mata under Morata(preferably Martial) or whoever the main man lands and Rashford. I personally think that's a pretty hard team to beat. But we aren't too good at picking out talent that isn't over priced. That seems to be Chelsea's, City's, and sometimes Liverpools forte. Which is a shame.
Interesting theory there. That said, Chelseas 2nd season was an anomaly as they downed tools, they also added Pedro and they had a complete system change that practically gave them 3 strikers. It is doubtful we change ours that much. The thing is, none of them have as weak attack as ours though. 49 then 54 league goals consecutively. There is something fundamentally wrong with United in an attacking sense. Could be composure or lack of quality. In Jose's teams, individual attacking quality seems more important as ex players suggested that he doesn't guide/advise them on how to attack. He does so defensively as we saw with Luke Shaw though lolJust adding players won't solve the goal scoring issue. We scored 49 goals in 2015-16 season, then added Pogba, Mkhitaryan, Zlatan and ended up with only 54 goals. Just adding few more players who scored good number of goals elswhere is not the only solution, there is a good chance that it isn't even the solution. Adding too many players means team will always lack chemistry, new players again needs time to adapt and all that. What we have to change is how we attack, it's to do with with how Jose sets up his team.
For example, Chelsea had the same attack but added Kante, Alonso and few other defenders, their goals in last 3 seasons - 73, 59, 85.
Spurs had the same attack in last 2 league seasons, their goals - 69 and 86. Some of the other players stepped up too.
That's what we should be expecting instead of just signing few more attackers. We should be doing much more to bring the best out of players like Mkhitaryan, Martial, Rashford, Mata who are all better players than what they showed last season. I think you can also look at how Monaco did, they didn't sign any star player or many attackers but they went from being defensive team to all out attacking and their attackers did superbly (along with emergence of Mbappe).
Interesting theory there. That said, Chelseas 2nd season was an anomaly as they downed tools, they also added Pedro and they had a complete system change that practically gave them 3 strikers. It is doubtful we change ours that much. The thing is, none of them have as weak attack as ours though. 49 then 54 league goals consecutively. There is something fundamentally wrong with United in an attacking sense. Could be composure or lack of quality. In Jose's teams, individual attacking quality seems more important as ex players suggested that he doesn't guide/advise them on how to attack. He does so defensively as we saw with Luke Shaw though lol
It was Hazard actually. That same attack scored more goals under Benitez the year before so it must of been capable.Bold part, not sure that's what ex player said. It was more fan theory IIRC. Also it doesn't make sense considering Jose's team always scored lot of goals. Also in 2013-14, only Liverpool and City scored more goals than Chelsea and their attack was Hazard (class player) and then players like Eto'o, Torres, Oscar, Ba (either average or washed up players).
Pogba, Mkhitaryan, Zlatan all came with big reputation, if they can't improve (along with Jose methods) then the chances are slim even if we add few more star players. Like I said, it's all to do with how Jose sets up his team. We have to play with higher tempo and commit lot more players forward.
Pedro was very poor last season and he improved this season. We should be show some patience with our players. For all the praise Spurs full back gets, it took them more than 5-6 years to show their quality.
It was Hazard actually. That same attack scored more goals under Benitez the year before so it must of been capable.
I do agree with you on many points and the set up of the team is crucial. And again, we did create a lot last season but lacked that quality/killer instinct in the final 3rd.