Fluctuation0161
Full Member
We need to invest in one or two pacey players to unlock our teams potential. Otherwise it'll be more of the same as last season.
Could be other factors, but this world cup also seems to highlight the dangers of older players. By and large the younger teams have been better. I'd be seriously worried about any players near 30.
Are those 3 really going to help bridge the gap to City though?
We've got three interesting players returning in Tuanzebe, TFM & Mitchell. All three could bolster our defence. I wouldn't mind at all if we are planning on giving them game time.
I think if we dont spend big where we need it this summer it is obvious as a club we have accepted we wont catch city any time soon and are happy to remain a top four club. I hope I'm wrong but if not it could be a grim few years ahead.
Be honest with yourself, when answering the question below.
You've seen what Jose has done during the last 2 years and also his entire career.
Do you honestly believe that Tuanzebe, TFM and Mitchell are going to be given lots of game time?
Jose will choose men who are in the mid-late 20s, over youngsters, everytime.
In fact, he'd much rather choose a player in his late 20s, who is half injured, than a youngster, who is fully fit. I've seen this happen on numerous occasions, during the last 2 seasons.
Could be other factors, but this world cup also seems to highlight the dangers of older players. By and large the younger teams have been better. I'd be seriously worried about any players near 30.
Erm Ronnie v Spain is a perfect illustration of my point. He did virtually nothing all match, scored a penalty, a free kick and a jammy goal keeper fluke. Once he didn't do those things, Portugal had nothing because he wasn't able to offer energy all match.Hang on.
Aren't Croatia using very experienced players in their late 20s and early 30s? And that's the team which is been punching above it's weight.
We expected France to do well.
Belgium and England have done better than predicted.
Ronaldo had the performance of the tournament, when Portugal played Spain and he is early 30s.
Modric is another player who some believe should win player of the tournament. He is in his 30s.
I am not sure any conclusions can be made about World Cup performances, in relation to the age of the players used.
After sitting through a season of people complaining about him playing McTominay, Rashford over Martial, Lingard (not young in age but experience), I'm not ruling anything out. He'll play the players that perform, regardless of age. I don't believe that Jose doesn't trust youngsters. Angel Gomes broke records for being the youngest United player under Jose.
Erm Ronnie v Spain is a perfect illustration of my point. He did virtually nothing all match, scored a penalty, a free kick and a jammy goal keeper fluke. Once he didn't do those things, Portugal had nothing because he wasn't able to offer energy all match.
Can't believe anyone would call that performance of the tournament. Best free kick sure.
It's all because of the World Cup,
No "Big Club" in europe has done any crazy transfers yet, Us, Barca, Real or Bayern haven't signed any big names, Juve have signed a few B grade players and have this big rumour about Ronaldo but it's still only a rumour,
Chelsea, City, Spuds haven't done anything, Pool signed Fabinho and have Keita which will improve them but I wouldn't class them as blockbuster, PSG haven't signed anyone, Atletico have kept Griezman and signed Lemar,
So I think everyone is kinda in the same boat here, transfer business would of been extremely difficult with the world cup happening and it wont ramp up until it's over.
Without a tactical change, it’ll be more of the same regardless who we sign, but I suppose this isn’t the thread for this matter.
BaleBe honest people, what player is there out there we could sign that would genuinely make us title contenders? The honest answer is no one. City will most likely get Jorginho and Mahrez and those two will already improve them greatly. Most likely scenario for us is probably Sandro and Willian and I can't see any major difference with those two on the team. I was really hoping Sanchez would be the difference maker, but all that signing did was push Martial and Rashford out of the team.
Not much we could do about it now as we just have to accept Sanchez has that LW spot and that means we desperately need someone on the RW as Martial and Rashford are lost ducklings in that position and with the way Jose constantly wants his wingers to track back and help out in defence I don't really see that many targets out there.
Mourinho's quotes regarding summer attacking signings back in February suggest we won't be making any:
“That’s the point, that’s the objective. The objective is that now we have one, apart from Zlatan Ibrahimoivc but let’s forget Zlatan for the moment, we have only one number nine and from having only one number nine now we have more number nines,” said Mourinho.
“We have Alexis, we have Romelu Lukaku, we have Martial, we have Rashford. Rashford can play on the left and on the right, Alexis is exactly the same, all of them apart from Lukaku can also play from behind, they can also play as a second striker.”
And Mourinho added that such a raft of options insures there is no need to buy more forwards come the end of the season.
“It’s bad for you because you like to have things to write and things to speculate especially in the summer, but I don’t want attacking players so don’t speak about attacking players coming here because nobody is coming here.
“Juan Mata, Lukaku, Rashford, Martial, Alexis … I don’t want attacking players so for speculation in the summer you have to go to other areas, but for attacking players I am really happy.
The problem here being that we'll have three weeks to sort our transfers after the tournament, while the rest of Europe needn't rush at all.
That's certainly what any sensible business person would conclude. Let this cycle of Peps run its course then invest.Maybe the owners have looked at the gap between us and City (and other top clubs in Europe) and concluded that the amount we'd have to spend to truly compete with them is not economically viable and that its a much more sustainable model to maintain us as a "top four" team with relatively minimal investment
Maybe the owners have looked at the gap between us and City (and other top clubs in Europe) and concluded that the amount we'd have to spend to truly compete with them is not economically viable and that its a much more sustainable model to maintain us as a "top four" team with relatively minimal investment
Been thinking about this for a while but don't want to believe it.Maybe the owners have looked at the gap between us and City (and other top clubs in Europe) and concluded that the amount we'd have to spend to truly compete with them is not economically viable and that its a much more sustainable model to maintain us as a "top four" team with relatively minimal investment
You’re right there , yet, interestingly, the prices bArca pay don’t seem to get hyped up as much as ours ?You might have missed the boat there mate. Barca spent around £270m on two players in the past year or so. This makes our £165m on Pogba and Lukaku look small fry.
We have spent £70m so far and I surmise that we will spend £80-100m more. With a few outgoings in Darmian and Blind, we'll have £20-30m more to spend as well as a lighter wage bill. I'd be very surprised if we don't get 2 more signings in.
As long as the Glazers are happy with the results that really matter to them - the financial results - this will be the case I feelMaybe the owners have looked at the gap between us and City (and other top clubs in Europe) and concluded that the amount we'd have to spend to truly compete with them is not economically viable and that its a much more sustainable model to maintain us as a "top four" team with relatively minimal investment
The Pilib guy says Mourinho doesn't have much to work with and has been unhappy with the board for some time. Feels he hasn't been backed enough. Don't know what to make of it.
Don't know if it's true but if you are not going to spend whatever it takes, then you should have hired a manager that fits that philosophy.
I do and have always thought the people who think we can spend 200/300m in one window are in fantansy land.
After watching Hing it. I'm even more sad the world cup is ending.Watching his periscope last night was depressing viewing. Worst thing is, sounds like everything he is saying is correct and Sandro will probably be the only other incoming.
You’re right there , yet, interestingly, the prices bArca pay don’t seem to get hyped up as much as ours ?
Also , I was referring less to big prices for marquee signings, which is to be expected, and more the quotes we are hearing for players like Arnautovic (50m?.) It seems clubs really try to highball us.
Where were you under Moyes?Worst transfer season ever. Post Fergie.