If Federer's a cnut then where do you go describing Nadal. Hitler? The Devil?
tbf, for as much as they win, all 3 of them are as humble as you could ever expect. Once you start winning on a consistent basis, you cannot have the same humility in defeat(or close wins) as when you did prior to the success, you just can't. This counts for competition at ANY level. It's not a cnut thing, it's a human thing, we ain't robots, being put in our places sometimes never feels good.
tbf, for as much as they win, all 3 of them are as humble as you could ever expect. Once you start winning on a consistent basis, you cannot have the same humility in defeat(or close wins) as when you did prior to the success, you just can't. This counts for competition at ANY level. It's not a cnut thing, it's a human thing, we ain't robots, being put in our places sometimes never feels good.
If Federer's a cnut then where do you go describing Nadal. Hitler? The Devil?
It's just an impression I've always got from him. When he lost to (I think) Murray a while ago, and he's in tears at losing, and I think Murray then lost to Federer in a final (may have been a slam), and in his speech, just as he started to go, he made the remark about being able to cry like Federer, he just couldn't play like him. He's also made a few scathing remarks about Murray (I believe in the aftermath of losing to him), and then just then, walks off, head down being applauded off, then Bennateau(sp) turned round to thank the crowd, which brought even more applause, whereas Federer just carried on walking off, despite having the whole crowd behind him.
By the way, for those interested, Tsonga shouldn't get top class opposition until the quarters, where he'd meet someone from Murray's section.
Murray should be expecting to play Del Potro/Roddick/Ferrer in the quarters, then Tsonga in the semis, then Djoko/Federer in the final.
To be honest Federer has been pretty classless a number of times in the past with his comments about Murray and Djokovic. So it's not just about lacking humility when he loses. Stuff said in the heat of the moment is still understandable compared to the stuff he has said pre tournaments. Seems to have calmed down a bit now though.
I think you've been over analysing things.
There's virtually nobody got a bad thing to say about Federer on or off the court. The fact is that in 10 years near the top of Tennis, he's hasn't put a foot wrong, true that he cries when he loses, he's not a great loser, and he doesn't go crazy when he wins. But Federer is better in personality than all other players in the world.
Haters gonna hate.
I think you've been over analysing things.
There's virtually nobody got a bad thing to say about Federer on or off the court. The fact is that in 10 years near the top of Tennis, he's hasn't put a foot wrong, true that he cries when he loses, he's not a great loser, and he doesn't go crazy when he wins. But Federer is better in personality than all other players in the world.
Haters gonna hate.
To be honest Federer has been pretty classless a number of times in the past with his comments about Murray and Djokovic. So it's not just about lacking humility when he loses. Stuff said in the heat of the moment is still understandable compared to the stuff he has said pre tournaments. Seems to have calmed down a bit now though.
Rosol who is ranked outside the top 100 believed that the incident during the second set, when the two bumped into each during a change-over, was an attempt by the Spaniard to unsettle him. “He wanted to take my concentration,” he said. “I knew that he would try something. “He talked to me a little bit. I thought that he wanted to let me go first, but then he started to walk fast. I stopped because I didn’t want him to hit me. He hit me, I was surprised that he could do it on the Centre Court of Wimbledon. But it was his choice.”
Get the money on for a straight sets defeat against Kohlschreiber.
Get the money on for a straight sets defeat against Kohlschreiber.
Said the other day after Rosol beat Nadal that he was almost guaranteed to go out in the next round. Look what happened to him in the end!
Did the BBC commentator just call Roddick a lucky bastard?
Anyway, I've got a feeling about Federer for the tournament. Djokovic will obviously be the favourite for it, but something's telling me Federer may win it and then bow out after it on a high.
I'd like to see Murray winning it, since he is Scottish, but almost so we don't hear how Murray hasn't won a grand slam going into every single major tennis tournament.
For outsiders, I'd say Del Potro and Tsonga. Del Potro looked good earlier, even if grass isn't his strongest surface. Tsonga was very dangerous at Wimbledon last year, and could have a decent passage to the final as well.
I feel it's in him but I'm not sure, on the basis of last night's evidence, that he will have the legs to beat a djokovic.
If he does then he'll have 7 Wimbledon's, no.1 ranking and the record of most weeks at number one. I would be over the moon.
You never know. What Federer did show yesterday is that he still has a winning mentality in him, and that even now when he isn't really winning grand slams anymore, he doesn't give up easily. He'll be a tricky challenge for Djokovic if he's not at the top of his game.
I hate Andy Murray with a passion, him and his deluded fans.
I hate Andy Murray with a passion, him and his deluded fans.
This match epitomises why he's not very likeable. Dour bloke playing percentage baseline tennis against Baggie who plays a more expansive game with a a bit of joie de vivre.I don't mind him. As a Scot, I'd like to see him finally win a major, even if it's only one in his career. He is very dour at times and can often be moody on the court when things aren't going his way, but apart from that there isn't too much wrong with that.
Murray going out