CallyRed
Full Member
- Joined
- Mar 19, 2009
- Messages
- 12,526
Look at this guy who owns a car - ever heard of a big shop?Who the feck calls a cab to get home from Tescos?
Look at this guy who owns a car - ever heard of a big shop?Who the feck calls a cab to get home from Tescos?
Look at this guy who owns a car - ever heard of a big shop?
I am fully aware that Fergie signed him, so I understand your point.I think you missed the word “post” there.
David de Gea and it's not even close.
Without knowing the names, I strongly suspect that evryone on that list is a (far) better player than Bruno.
Sorry cant agree. We have past players who won even less but I think of as legends. Martin Buchan being one. Its not just about titles but also about their part in the history of the clubVery little chance. His personal stats will be up there with anyone by the time he leaves but I don't think you can be a legend with no major honors as a team and being a player who generally struggled against the best teams. If he keeps his high production and we somehow win the league in the next two years or while he's still here then maybe, but "Legend" status should go to the truly best of the best players that were both world class in the sport and helped the club achieve huge things/elevated the club to huge heights. Not just "very good player who played for United for a long period of time"
That’s great, but the status of the club nowadays means the standards to be considered a “legend” have too. What has Bruno done to be “part of the history” apart from win a couple of domestic cups?Sorry cant agree. We have past players who won even less but I think of as legends. Martin Buchan being one. Its not just about titles but also about their part in the history of the club
"Status of the club nowadays"..... Nice, lets just use some slogan to allow ourselves the ability to simply dismiss nearly 150 years of history and the efforts of all those past players etc. Legend status for me involves more than just how many trophies or awards a player won or their "stats"That’s great, but the status of the club nowadays means the standards to be considered a “legend” have too. What has Bruno done to be “part of the history” apart from win a couple of domestic cups?
And I’m really not trying to turn this into me dogging Bruno, but I also don’t think a player should be considered a legend of one of the biggest clubs in the sport just because he produced consistently good statistical seasons in what many consider underperforming teams.
Great, then what exactly denotes what a “legend” is for you? Beacause you clearly have a different definition than most"Status of the club nowadays"..... Nice, lets just use some slogan to allow ourselves the ability to simply dismiss nearly 150 years of history and the efforts of all those past players etc. Legend status for me involves more than just how many trophies or awards a player won or their "stats"
My point is that you are using the whole "status of the club nowadays" routine to dismiss so many past players. All clubs the big clubs in England have had periods where there has been great success or very poor eras. What happens to the players who played during the lean years? Do their efforts mean nothing just because the team wasnt winning trophies when they played?Great, then what exactly denotes what a “legend” is for you? Beacause you clearly have a different definition than most
Name those players a lot of fans call legends that Bruno has more credit than.Considering some of the players a lot of fans refer to as legends he should have a statue.
Games | Goals | Assists | GPG | Rank | APG | Rank | G + A PG | Rank | |
Ruud van Nistelrooy | 219 | 150 | 29 | 0.68 | 2 | 0.13 | 17 | 0.82 | 1 |
Éric Cantona | 185 | 82 | 62 | 0.44 | 9 | 0.34 | 1 | 0.78 | 2 |
Tommy Taylor | 186 | 131 | 9 | 0.70 | 1 | 0.05 | 26 | 0.75 | 3 |
Wayne Rooney | 559 | 253 | 139 | 0.45 | 7 | 0.25 | 6 | 0.70 | 4 |
Dwight Yorke | 152 | 66 | 32 | 0.43 | 11 | 0.21 | 7 | 0.64 | 5 |
Dennis Viollet | 281 | 173 | 6 | 0.62 | 3 | 0.02 | 32 | 0.64 | 6 |
Bruno Fernandes | 257 | 85 | 76 | 0.33 | 16 | 0.30 | 4 | 0.63 | 7 |
Denis Law | 406 | 237 | 12 | 0.58 | 4 | 0.03 | 30 | 0.61 | 8 |
Cristiano Ronaldo | 346 | 145 | 64 | 0.42 | 12 | 0.18 | 10 | 0.60 | 9 |
Andy Cole | 275 | 121 | 45 | 0.44 | 10 | 0.16 | 12 | 0.60 | 10 |
David Herd | 260 | 145 | 5 | 0.56 | 5 | 0.02 | 33 | 0.58 | 11 |
David Beckham | 391 | 85 | 121 | 0.22 | 24 | 0.31 | 2 | 0.53 | 12 |
Teddy Sheringham | 153 | 46 | 31 | 0.30 | 19 | 0.20 | 9 | 0.50 | 13 |
Ole Gunnar Solskjær | 366 | 126 | 56 | 0.34 | 15 | 0.15 | 13 | 0.50 | 14 |
Nani | 230 | 41 | 70 | 0.18 | 28 | 0.30 | 3 | 0.48 | 15 |
Marcus Rashford | 426 | 138 | 64 | 0.32 | 18 | 0.15 | 14 | 0.47 | 16 |
Jack Rowley | 235 | 108 | 1 | 0.46 | 6 | 0.00 | 37 | 0.46 | 17 |
Stan Pearson | 202 | 91 | 1 | 0.45 | 8 | 0.00 | 36 | 0.46 | 18 |
Ryan Giggs | 958 | 167 | 264 | 0.17 | 29 | 0.28 | 5 | 0.45 | 19 |
Anthony Martial | 317 | 90 | 47 | 0.28 | 20 | 0.15 | 15 | 0.43 | 20 |
George Best | 470 | 179 | 11 | 0.38 | 13 | 0.02 | 31 | 0.40 | 21 |
Mark Hughes | 443 | 158 | 19 | 0.36 | 14 | 0.04 | 27 | 0.40 | 22 |
Paul Pogba | 233 | 39 | 48 | 0.17 | 30 | 0.21 | 8 | 0.37 | 23 |
Sir Bobby Charlton | 744 | 243 | 24 | 0.33 | 17 | 0.03 | 29 | 0.36 | 24 |
Paul Scholes | 714 | 153 | 82 | 0.21 | 25 | 0.11 | 19 | 0.33 | 25 |
Juan Mata | 285 | 51 | 42 | 0.18 | 27 | 0.15 | 16 | 0.33 | 26 |
Brian McClair | 446 | 112 | 16 | 0.25 | 22 | 0.04 | 28 | 0.29 | 27 |
Frank Stapleton | 273 | 72 | 4 | 0.26 | 21 | 0.01 | 34 | 0.28 | 28 |
Lee Sharpe | 253 | 36 | 29 | 0.14 | 31 | 0.11 | 20 | 0.26 | 29 |
Antonio Valencia | 339 | 25 | 58 | 0.07 | 33 | 0.17 | 11 | 0.24 | 30 |
Bryan Robson | 431 | 94 | 6 | 0.22 | 23 | 0.01 | 35 | 0.23 | 31 |
Lou Macari | 330 | 70 | 0 | 0.21 | 26 | 0.00 | 38 | 0.21 | 32 |
Ashley Young | 261 | 19 | 32 | 0.07 | 34 | 0.12 | 18 | 0.20 | 33 |
Roy Keane | 478 | 51 | 39 | 0.11 | 32 | 0.08 | 24 | 0.19 | 34 |
Darren Fletcher | 342 | 24 | 31 | 0.07 | 35 | 0.09 | 21 | 0.16 | 35 |
Michael Carrick | 464 | 24 | 35 | 0.05 | 36 | 0.08 | 25 | 0.13 | 36 |
Patrice Evra | 379 | 10 | 33 | 0.03 | 37 | 0.09 | 22 | 0.11 | 37 |
Gary Neville | 598 | 7 | 49 | 0.01 | 38 | 0.08 | 23 | 0.09 | 38 |
As frustrating as Bruno is at times he has been by far in a way our best player since he arrived.
How you define a legend is very personal, I mean I think of players like Neil Webb, Clayton Blackmore, John O'Shea differently and in higher regard because they are the players that I connect emotionally with during positive times even though technically they were all just OK (not saying these are legends BTW).
But if we look at stats, this is just taken from the internet and compiled from top 25 goal scorers + top 25 assists (duplicates removed) (at bottom of post)
Goals per game has him just behind Ole and notably ahead of Charlton, Robbo, Beckham, Scholes and Giggs
Assists per game he is only behind Cantona, Beckham and Nani
Goal contributions per game he is 7th
This is in a period where we have been largely poor, and most of the players he is behind got their goals and assists during a period where we were free scoring and dominant, our most successful period in history!
So technically by stats Bruno is definitely a legend, for all of his faults and annoying bits and bobs, he is really the only player in our current squad who feels like he comes close to legend status.
Games Goals Assists GPG Rank APG Rank G + A PG Rank Ruud van Nistelrooy 219 150 29 0.68 20.13 17 0.82 1Éric Cantona 185 82 62 0.44 90.34 1 0.78 2Tommy Taylor 186 131 9 0.70 10.05 26 0.75 3Wayne Rooney 559 253 139 0.45 70.25 6 0.70 4Dwight Yorke 152 66 32 0.43 110.21 7 0.64 5Dennis Viollet 281 173 6 0.62 30.02 32 0.64 6Bruno Fernandes 257 85 76 0.33 160.30 4 0.63 7Denis Law 406 237 12 0.58 40.03 30 0.61 8Cristiano Ronaldo 346 145 64 0.42 120.18 10 0.60 9Andy Cole 275 121 45 0.44 100.16 12 0.60 10David Herd 260 145 5 0.56 50.02 33 0.58 11David Beckham 391 85 121 0.22 240.31 2 0.53 12Teddy Sheringham 153 46 31 0.30 190.20 9 0.50 13Ole Gunnar Solskjær 366 126 56 0.34 150.15 13 0.50 14Nani 230 41 70 0.18 280.30 3 0.48 15Marcus Rashford 426 138 64 0.32 180.15 14 0.47 16Jack Rowley 235 108 1 0.46 60.00 37 0.46 17Stan Pearson 202 91 1 0.45 80.00 36 0.46 18Ryan Giggs 958 167 264 0.17 290.28 5 0.45 19Anthony Martial 317 90 47 0.28 200.15 15 0.43 20George Best 470 179 11 0.38 130.02 31 0.40 21Mark Hughes 443 158 19 0.36 140.04 27 0.40 22Paul Pogba 233 39 48 0.17 300.21 8 0.37 23Sir Bobby Charlton 744 243 24 0.33 170.03 29 0.36 24Paul Scholes 714 153 82 0.21 250.11 19 0.33 25Juan Mata 285 51 42 0.18 270.15 16 0.33 26Brian McClair 446 112 16 0.25 220.04 28 0.29 27Frank Stapleton 273 72 4 0.26 210.01 34 0.28 28Lee Sharpe 253 36 29 0.14 310.11 20 0.26 29Antonio Valencia 339 25 58 0.07 330.17 11 0.24 30Bryan Robson 431 94 6 0.22 230.01 35 0.23 31Lou Macari 330 70 0 0.21 260.00 38 0.21 32Ashley Young 261 19 32 0.07 340.12 18 0.20 33Roy Keane 478 51 39 0.11 320.08 24 0.19 34Darren Fletcher 342 24 31 0.07 350.09 21 0.16 35Michael Carrick 464 24 35 0.05 360.08 25 0.13 36Patrice Evra 379 10 33 0.03 370.09 22 0.11 37Gary Neville 598 7 49 0.01 380.08 23 0.09 38
My point is that you are using the whole "status of the club nowadays" routine to dismiss so many past players. All clubs the big clubs in England have had periods where there has been great success or very poor eras. What happens to the players who played during the lean years? Do their efforts mean nothing just because the team wasnt winning trophies when they played?
Legend means more to me than just how many titles or trophies won. The players place and part in the history of the club, the context of the time and era matter. Time will determine if Bruno ends up with Legend status. BTW I never said if he was or wasnt, I was disagreeing with your argument of what a legend is defined by.
Its not defined by the status of the club nowadays but buy their abilities their efforts, their contributions all within the context of the era they played in. Right now we are in a shit era.
Arthur Albiston is a Utd Legend. Only won the 2nd division title and a couple of cups. Your criteria would consign him to the trash heap
Manchester Uniteds official website has Arthur Albiston listed as a club legend.This seems like more of your own personal definition of a "legend" though, as it means that there are seemingly "club legends" being formed constantly because if a player plays for the club for a prolonged period of time that seems to qualify him in your eyes. Michael Carrick is more of a "club legend" than Albiston by your metrics, but I don't think either should be regarded as a United "legend" that puts them in the same group as a Rooney/Best/Charlton etc.
Neither player gets "consigned to the trash heap" as you dramatically say, but I also don't think the term "legend" should just be applied to a large group players or taken lightly. My point about "club status" wasn't meant to diminish what players from a past era did, but moreso what the standard of what a "legend" is.
So technically by stats Bruno is definitely a legend, for all of his faults and annoying bits and bobs, he is really the only player in our current squad who feels like he comes close to legend status.
What has Bruno achieved at United that Rashford hasn't? He's played fewer games and won fewer trophies than Rashford
And Rashford is less than 20 goals away from being in the club's top 10 all-time scorers.What has Bruno achieved at United that Rashford hasn't? He's played fewer games and won fewer trophies than Rashford
What has Bruno achieved at United that Rashford hasn't? He's played fewer games and won fewer trophies than Rashford
I kind of agree, which is why I said what makes a legend is very personal, it cannot be based on titles because, how could you be a player for a team that never wins anything and still be a legend for that club, there is no metric for how you or I feel about a player, so it is either purely subjective in which case everybody is right or you have to fall back on stats alone.Yeah, but come on - the very list you posted highlights how absurd it is to bring sheer stats into a "legend" discussion.
Does anyone consider Martial a bigger "United legend" than Brian McClair?
(Or - say - Lou Macari if you want someone from before SAF?)
I like Bruno, nothing against him. But whether he has done enough since his arrival to make him a "legend" is very much debatable.
He's been our best player (overall) in that period - yes. But he has 100% NOT been some kind of Stevie G (and much less a Bryan Robson) in said period.
These assists stats aren't accurate for players whose careeres were moslty before 1992.As frustrating as Bruno is at times he has been by far in a way our best player since he arrived.
How you define a legend is very personal, I mean I think of players like Neil Webb, Clayton Blackmore, John O'Shea differently and in higher regard because they are the players that I connect emotionally with during positive times even though technically they were all just OK (not saying these are legends BTW).
But if we look at stats, this is just taken from the internet and compiled from top 25 goal scorers + top 25 assists (duplicates removed) (at bottom of post)
Goals per game has him just behind Ole and notably ahead of Charlton, Robbo, Beckham, Scholes and Giggs
Assists per game he is only behind Cantona, Beckham and Nani
Goal contributions per game he is 7th
This is in a period where we have been largely poor, and most of the players he is behind got their goals and assists during a period where we were free scoring and dominant, our most successful period in history!
So technically by stats Bruno is definitely a legend, for all of his faults and annoying bits and bobs, he is really the only player in our current squad who feels like he comes close to legend status.
Games Goals Assists GPG Rank APG Rank G + A PG Rank Ruud van Nistelrooy 219 150 29 0.68 20.13 17 0.82 1Éric Cantona 185 82 62 0.44 90.34 1 0.78 2Tommy Taylor 186 131 9 0.70 10.05 26 0.75 3Wayne Rooney 559 253 139 0.45 70.25 6 0.70 4Dwight Yorke 152 66 32 0.43 110.21 7 0.64 5Dennis Viollet 281 173 6 0.62 30.02 32 0.64 6Bruno Fernandes 257 85 76 0.33 160.30 4 0.63 7Denis Law 406 237 12 0.58 40.03 30 0.61 8Cristiano Ronaldo 346 145 64 0.42 120.18 10 0.60 9Andy Cole 275 121 45 0.44 100.16 12 0.60 10David Herd 260 145 5 0.56 50.02 33 0.58 11David Beckham 391 85 121 0.22 240.31 2 0.53 12Teddy Sheringham 153 46 31 0.30 190.20 9 0.50 13Ole Gunnar Solskjær 366 126 56 0.34 150.15 13 0.50 14Nani 230 41 70 0.18 280.30 3 0.48 15Marcus Rashford 426 138 64 0.32 180.15 14 0.47 16Jack Rowley 235 108 1 0.46 60.00 37 0.46 17Stan Pearson 202 91 1 0.45 80.00 36 0.46 18Ryan Giggs 958 167 264 0.17 290.28 5 0.45 19Anthony Martial 317 90 47 0.28 200.15 15 0.43 20George Best 470 179 11 0.38 130.02 31 0.40 21Mark Hughes 443 158 19 0.36 140.04 27 0.40 22Paul Pogba 233 39 48 0.17 300.21 8 0.37 23Sir Bobby Charlton 744 243 24 0.33 170.03 29 0.36 24Paul Scholes 714 153 82 0.21 250.11 19 0.33 25Juan Mata 285 51 42 0.18 270.15 16 0.33 26Brian McClair 446 112 16 0.25 220.04 28 0.29 27Frank Stapleton 273 72 4 0.26 210.01 34 0.28 28Lee Sharpe 253 36 29 0.14 310.11 20 0.26 29Antonio Valencia 339 25 58 0.07 330.17 11 0.24 30Bryan Robson 431 94 6 0.22 230.01 35 0.23 31Lou Macari 330 70 0 0.21 260.00 38 0.21 32Ashley Young 261 19 32 0.07 340.12 18 0.20 33Roy Keane 478 51 39 0.11 320.08 24 0.19 34Darren Fletcher 342 24 31 0.07 350.09 21 0.16 35Michael Carrick 464 24 35 0.05 360.08 25 0.13 36Patrice Evra 379 10 33 0.03 370.09 22 0.11 37Gary Neville 598 7 49 0.01 380.08 23 0.09 38
By stats alone Bruno has to be a legend, but does he feel like a legend, is a bit more difficult, he kind of feels almost like a legend, but is that because we haven't had any player come in over the last 10 years or more that have really distinguished themselves?
Posts like this grind my geers.Bruno is a liability on big games yesterday was another example . Legend no chance , probably will go down as one of worst captains Man Utd had together with Ashley Young and Harry Maguire .
Spot on, agreed.Bruno is a liability on big games yesterday was another example . Legend no chance , probably will go down as one of worst captains Man Utd had together with Ashley Young and Harry Maguire .
Not sure, if I consider that as odd timing, weird, sad, funny or outwright crazy...Time to bump this.
C'mon you Bruno haters show some appreciation.
The man IS a Man Utd legend!
(Whether we win the Prem/CL or not)
There you go. For most people, legends are forged in the fires of success. It's fine and well that there are different definitions and we can argue all day whether one player or the other is in the list or not but for most people, a legend is the highest possible echelon, how could Bruno be there, given where we are ranging in terms of success. People are desperate to label our players world class... Which I can see why but I always think back to the older days, when posts like such were a good source of fun... when they were taken from RAWK...This is in a period where we have been largely poor, and most of the players he is behind got their goals and assists during a period where we were free scoring and dominant, our most successful period in history!
Posts like yours just as many.Posts like this grind my geers.
Exactly. In fact, I'd cut him even more slack than you and say he doesn't have to win either of these big trophies. Just have an incredible, consistent, full season (ideally without moaning the moment things don't go his way, but that can be forgiven).You don't achieve Legend status for leading a Medicore team to a mid-table standing. May be possible for club like Palace or Forest, but should we expect more? On the other hand, if he manages to lead the club to a major trophy, such as CL or EPL, then possibly yes, like Moses out of wilderness.
Can’t really see how a constructive discussion over Bruno’s potential legend status would have any kind of tangible impact on the club.
People need to chill out. One of the many problems we have as a club is we over rate our players alot.
We need to calm down.