The typical gambit of conflating people injured per team with key personnel.
Its reasonimg as done above that has some of us pegging the likes of you as unreasonably agenda driven....
Fulham's style of play fir example can't collapse with their 3 key men out because, not only do they actually have direct alternatives who can fill in. Their style of play doesn't hinge on those player in those positions.
In comparison United has lost its ENTIRE defensive left side, both in terms of pace and the style of build up play the manager prefers. A manager whose style works best with two left footed defenders with pace. With ZERO viable alternatives. In addition they lost the entire focal point of attack, who is not only a key presser, he has no back up alternative either.
Yes both Fulham and Manchester J itrd have lost key players
Yet The loss fulham has suffered frankly pales in comparison to Manchester United's.
Frankly anyone NOW claiming they expected us "to boss Fulham" before a ball was kicked today is a certified liar. Most pre match comments on her and out there in the re world were how difficult it was going to be and clutching at straws as to what solutions fans hoped ETH could pick to survive the tie with 3 points.