I much prefer Henry to Robben and I was a Robben fan.
You prefer him or you think that he was better? I prefer Henry but I think that Robben was better.
I much prefer Henry to Robben and I was a Robben fan.
No he doesn’t. Him winning PSG’s first CL would be a bigger achievement than going to Madrid or City and winning one for them. The fact is only the best teams in the world could afford Mbappé, and whether it’s a team like Madrid, or a team like City, the criticism will already be built in that he’s playing in a stacked team that won without him in the past. So it’s completely irrelevant where he goes and if he wins his hometown its first CL, with all the great players that have tried and failed, it means far more from a legacy standpoint than joining the best team in a better league because every single league is top heavy and the rest of the teams in each of those leagues are cannon fodder for players like Mbappé. It’s just the arrogant and entitled fans of those other leagues who hold those opinions and it simply doesn’t seem to matter to him, not to mention it’s not stopping anybody from regarding him now as the best or one of the best players in the world.
And.. what if he never wins the CL with PSG?
He was a better footballer.You prefer him or you think that he was better? I prefer Henry but I think that Robben was better.
Even if Ligue 1 was shit. Mbappé demolishes every single ratios that Henry has in the CL and with France, he is also a more important player for France than Henry has ever been. Mbappé has 40 goals and 22 assists in 60 UEFA competitions games against 50 goals and 16 assists for Henry in 112 games. In the better competitions Mbappé beats the brakes out of Henry.
What the hell? I actually think it's closer than this thread seems to think, but what a bizarre thing to say.
True enough.On the Caf you're as good as your last game usually.
Which is why this thread never gets bumped or created on a random Tuesday.
Nice post, but you stayed dead centre, Mr. Devil's Advocate.If Mbappe continues to dominate and has the platform to continue deciding on the biggest stage, he will likely go down as a top 5-20 player of all time. Right now he's on the same trajectory as Eusebio for me.
That said I don't fully agree that Henry's big-game record marks him down in this comparison. After all, if you wanted to be an arse you could say that Mbappe had a terrible Euros last year and spurned chances in the biggest club game of his career as PSG lost to Bayern in the CL final. I don't buy that line of thinking either as he's done plenty against top opposition to make it a moot point. But we need a more nuanced assessment of Henry's performances against the best teams.
In his defence:
I include the records against these three sides because they were all amongst the top teams in Europe with Chelsea, in particular, one of the toughest teams to play against of the modern era. His outputs were impressive and he delivered some of the most memorable performances the English game has seen.
- 97/98 Champions League - Henry scores 7 in 9 games, including in the semi-final against Juventus.
- 99/00 UEFA Cup run - Henry scores 7 in 7, including 3 against Spanish champions Deportivo.
- Euro 2000 - in the team of the tournament, with a tremendous performance in the final against one of the greatest international defences of all time
- Big performances in the Champions League - goal and assist home to Bayern (the best team in Europe that year) and goal against Valencia in the quarters (best defence in Europe) in 00/01, hat-trick away to Roma in 02, 2 goals and 2 assists in the 5-1 demolition of Inter in the San Siro in 03/04, that solo goal away to Real Madrid and a goal and assist in 2-0 win against Juve in 05/06
- World Cup 2006 - in the team of the tournament
- Record against Chelsea - has 10 goals in 11 PL games
- Record against Man Utd - has 8 in 13 league games.
- Record against Liverpool - has 8 in 14 league games.
There is a case for the prosecution - he could not inspire an ageing France in World Cup 2002 or Euro 2004, and his domestic cup final record was a bit underwhelming, with no goals in 3 FA Cup finals.
It's worth highlighting just how reliant Arsenal were on him to produce magic. In 2002-03, he scored or assisted 10 of Arsenal's 15 goals in the Champions League; in 2003-04 it was 12 out of 16; in 2004-05 it was 5 out of 13; and in 2005-06 it was 7 out of 11. Over that four-year period in the Champions League he scored or assisted 62% of the goals Arsenal scored while he was on the park (fwiw Mbappe's CL average is 50%).
Class performance that - it was the one game of the entire tournament that Zidane didn't dominate and France needed him to step up.
What the hell? I actually think it's closer than this thread seems to think, but what a bizarre thing to say.
After Mbappe scored his double against Denmark, a thread about Mbappe being the best French player ever was created. After scoring twice against Poland this thread was created. So to answer your question, it is about people's memory of Mbappe's latest games.Do you think the thread is about Mbappè’s last game or a clear and formulating body of work showing obvious exponential growth to the point it has to be discussed?
He was a shadow of his prime self with chronic back issues restricting both his availability and his mobility. Not to mention having to (gracefully) accommodate Messi.Henry at barcelona made me rate him less.
I’m tall for nostalgia but Mbappe is already at the levels Henry reached and he’s just 23. How can you see his achievements in the Champions League and World Cups and not think that? Henry was spectacular, but at no point the best in the world. Mbappe is the best in the world atm and is getting better and better. He has that Ronaldo Messi gear to shift into and we are witnessing that transition right now.
He does because of how they play him. They see the ball way more than he does, that’s part of his issues there. Put Mbappe on the left and he’ll destroy teams but for now he needs to play that role infront of Messi and Neymar.As good as he is, he hasn't. In terms of talent, he IMO ranks fourth among him, Messi, Neymar and Ronaldo. Maybe on par with the latter. He's obviously much more driven and injury resistant than Neymar which means he's a better player over a season or longer but Mbappe regularly looks third best among the three superstars at PSG.
He does because of how they play him. They see the ball way more than he does, that’s part of his issues there. Put Mbappe on the left and he’ll destroy teams but for now he needs to play that role infront of Messi and Neymar.
And last year he was a lot better than both Messi and Neymar. He's had a poor start of the season by his own very high standards but it doesn't make much sense to cherry-pick those few months to rank them three.As good as he is, he hasn't. In terms of talent, he IMO ranks fourth among him, Messi, Neymar and Ronaldo. Maybe on par with the latter. He's obviously much more driven and injury resistant than Neymar which means he's a better player over a season or longer but Mbappe regularly looks third best among the three superstars at PSG.
Yes, he's kept out of his favorite position by better players. Neymar and Messi are clearly better players in terms of chance creation, playing between the lines, ball retention, etc. - which are important attributes in his favorite position, less so as a striker. Mbappe's close control and vision can't compare to theirs.
Henry was never all of those things?I rate Henry as a genuine peer to Dinho and Zidane, and I think Mbappé is that good right now. In 5 years time this thread will look like madness. Mbappé warps football games in a way I've only seen with Ronaldo and Messi. You can't play a high line against him. You can't leave him 1vs1. You can't give him a sliver of space within 20 yards of the goal. If you manage to keep him away from the box, you still have to deal with his dribbling and playmaking. He's special in a way Henry never was
In that context, it’s about a player expected to be one of, if not the star of, the tournament performing exactly how he was expected to. Top billing and delivering is something many, many more touted to do the same throughout history absolutely wilted under, not least Henry himself, or, as another example, Ronaldinho in 2006. It isn’t something that can be brushed under the carpet as very few can cope under that intense a spotlight and those that can are rightly elevated for it. It won’t be prescient in the slightest to expect Mbappè to go through the entire tournament in the same, or better vein.After Mbappe scored his double against Denmark, a thread about Mbappe being the best French player ever was created. After scoring twice against Poland this thread was created. So to answer your question, it is about people's memory of Mbappe's latest games.
Mbappe is still very young, not even halfway through with his footballing career, his body of work which isn't even half completed isn't currently better than one of football greatest entire career, people have to calm down and stop kneejerking with every single game.
The big competitions are the UCL and World Cup/Euros. Mbappe has already made more impact there then Henry ever did.Henry was fantastic. He's the better player but Mbappe will probably over take him...he'll need to move to the PL or La Liga to achieve that. But in terms of star power, Mbappe is in a different stratosphere.
The big competitions are the UCL and World Cup/Euros. Mbappe has already made more impact there then Henry ever did.
At this stage, I think that Mbappe is just below or tied with Henry as the third best French player ever. In a few years, he will be far ahead of Henry.
Whom would you have the best after Platini and Zidane?Henry isn't the third best player ever.
If Mbappe continues to dominate and has the platform to continue deciding on the biggest stage, he will likely go down as a top 5-20 player of all time. Right now he's on the same trajectory as Eusebio for me.
That said I don't fully agree that Henry's big-game record marks him down in this comparison. After all, if you wanted to be an arse you could say that Mbappe had a terrible Euros last year and spurned chances in the biggest club game of his career as PSG lost to Bayern in the CL final. I don't buy that line of thinking either as he's done plenty against top opposition to make it a moot point. But we need a more nuanced assessment of Henry's performances against the best teams.
In his defence:
I include the records against these three sides because they were all amongst the top teams in Europe with Chelsea, in particular, one of the toughest teams to play against of the modern era. His outputs were impressive and he delivered some of the most memorable performances the English game has seen.
- 97/98 Champions League - Henry scores 7 in 9 games, including in the semi-final against Juventus.
- 99/00 UEFA Cup run - Henry scores 7 in 7, including 3 against Spanish champions Deportivo.
- Euro 2000 - in the team of the tournament, with a tremendous performance in the final against one of the greatest international defences of all time
- Big performances in the Champions League - goal and assist home to Bayern (the best team in Europe that year) and goal against Valencia in the quarters (best defence in Europe) in 00/01, hat-trick away to Roma in 02, 2 goals and 2 assists in the 5-1 demolition of Inter in the San Siro in 03/04, that solo goal away to Real Madrid and a goal and assist in 2-0 win against Juve in 05/06
- World Cup 2006 - in the team of the tournament
- Record against Chelsea - has 10 goals in 11 PL games
- Record against Man Utd - has 8 in 13 league games.
- Record against Liverpool - has 8 in 14 league games.
There is a case for the prosecution - he could not inspire an ageing France in World Cup 2002 or Euro 2004, and his domestic cup final record was a bit underwhelming, with no goals in 3 FA Cup finals.
It's worth highlighting just how reliant Arsenal were on him to produce magic. In 2002-03, he scored or assisted 10 of Arsenal's 15 goals in the Champions League; in 2003-04 it was 12 out of 16; in 2004-05 it was 5 out of 13; and in 2005-06 it was 7 out of 11. Over that four-year period in the Champions League he scored or assisted 62% of the goals Arsenal scored while he was on the park (fwiw Mbappe's CL average is 50%).
Class performance that - it was the one game of the entire tournament that Zidane didn't dominate and France needed him to step up.
He does because of how they play him. They see the ball way more than he does, that’s part of his issues there. Put Mbappe on the left and he’ll destroy teams but for now he needs to play that role infront of Messi and Neymar.
Whom would you have the best after Platini and Zidane?
Not like thisHenry was never all of those things?
All before of my time except Deschamps. Didn't know that he is considered better than Henry (I mean overall, not necessarily for the NT).It's generally one of Kopa, Fontaine, Papin or Deschamps. While Henry is in the next group with Giresse, Desailly, Trésor and a few others. Henry being third would be highly debatable and debated.
Henry carried Arsenal to the UCL final but then choked.The big competitions are the UCL and World Cup/Euros. Mbappe has already made more impact there then Henry ever did.
At this stage, I think that Mbappe is just below or tied with Henry as the third best French player ever. In a few years, he will be far ahead of Henry.
All before of my time except Deschamps. Didn't know that he is considered better than Henry (I mean overall, not necessarily for the NT).
Henry carried Arsenal to the UCL final but then choked.
Im starting to think this recency bias is fecking up with some of you here.