Who is better, RVP or Suarez?

This is correct also, Carrick was incredible that season and some United fans even voted for him over RvP as the best player. Remember Rooney having a poor season though (forced out a bit due to Van Persie). Remember De Gea being excellent, as well as the likes of Rafael being brilliant too. Ferdinand was immense that year as well.
Liverpool fans will argue their team was very strong and it wasn't Suarez that single handedly carried them to the tit... erm 2nd place.
 
Liverpool fans will argue their team was very strong and it wasn't Suarez that single handedly carried them to the tit... erm 2nd place.

He didn't single handedly carry them, nor did Van Persie. He was absolutely exceptional but Sturridge, Henderson and even Gerrard just as examples all had excellent seasons.

Bale was the most one man team I've ever seen, like seriously it wasn't even all our play going through him. We played rubbish for about 85 minutes and then he'd score an absolute peach and we'd win. It was all him.
 
He didn't single handedly carry them, nor did Van Persie. He was absolutely exceptional but Sturridge, Henderson and even Gerrard just as examples all had excellent seasons.

Bale was the most one man team I've ever seen, like seriously it wasn't even all our play going through him. We played rubbish for about 85 minutes and then he'd score an absolute peach and we'd win. It was all him.
I remember a game against Lyon I think that season where you were destined to go out an he pulled a fantastic strike in the 90th minute to push you through, and he'd already been great in the first game against them.
 
Also, your last statement made me chuckle. United's back on what evidence? You haven't played a single match yet. Have a much better manager now and have signed two good (but far from world-class) players. Being a bit premature/arrogant don't you think? I don't blame United fans for being excited and wanting revenge over gloating fans and I do believe they will have a good season but proclaiming that you are "back" on the basis of a couple of decent signings and a good manager is a bit much. Let's see how things unfold. I like United fans and you're one of the few clubs in the league that I don't detest at the top but your fans do have a reputation for arrogance and its statements like that which give it to you.

Oh, our fans are guilty of worse things than just arrogance.

Of course, there's no "evidence" for such things as predictions. Call it faith or whatever. You did mention yourself couple of reasons which might enforce that faith.
 
Oh, our fans are guilty of worse things than just arrogance.

Of course, there's no "evidence" for such things as predictions. Call it faith or whatever. You did mention yourself couple of reasons which might enforce that faith.

I did indeed and I stand by them, but I'd be wary of saying you're back already, at least wait a while for the next season. Lots of cause for optimism though.
 
I remember a game against Lyon I think that season where you were destined to go out an he pulled a fantastic strike in the 90th minute to push you through, and he'd already been great in the first game against them.

He scored a pearl of a free kick as well against them. I don't think he was even particularly good overall, he just pulled off moments of genius.

It's quite funny when you think about it that we were expected to do so much better the next season, after signing a ton of players unproven in the league. I don't think people realise just how much we relied on Bale, we had to go from that to being more of a team and it just didn't work.

It was silly really, every single great moment was down to him.
 
I thought the squad was excellent that season, you make it sound as if you thought Carrick, DDG, Rooney, and the rest were all average and RVP did a Bale/Suarez.

Of course, just like Liverpool had players playing exceptionally well also.
 
RVP did get subbed off a bit so it slightly skews the ratio and he scored a few pens whereas Suarez didn't take any, he got more assists as well than RVP.
It doesn't skew anything it just goes to show that RvP ratio is better.

RVP 11/12 a goal every 84 minutes he played 3122 minutes
Suarez 13/14 a goal every 95 minutes he played 2963 minutes.

Add to that he scored against the top sides.
 
Van Persie 12/13 and Suarez 13/14 seasons.

v89veqb.png

Always knew about it, of course, but when visualized Suarez's record looks so exaggerated. Thanks for the stats.
 
Flat track bully. Nice expression.

40 goals against top half of the table, 91 against bottom half. (last six seasons)

He's literally worse player than Van Persie.
 
Suarez by a country mile.

Van Persie is very good, Suarez is world class. Van Persie is much more reliant on the service he gets though. Suarez can make something out of nothing, Van Persie can´t really. Van Persie is a player with brilliant moments, Suarez´s got those moments as well but he´s also much more present in the match. Van Persie can really disappear from the match, you´ll see Suarez go at it for the full 90 minutes and injury (+ extra) time.
 
Suarez last season was the best forward I've seen in England since Henry, and the best player since Ronaldo.
 
2012/2013 RvP
2013/2014 Suarez and he's probably 3rd best player on the planet.
 
Suarez is the best player to play in the league since Ronaldo. Suarez is the better player.
Can't argue with that, Suarez last season was on a level only Ronaldo reached last season. *preparing myself for the Messi lovers to come rip my head off at that*
 
On current form it's obvious Suarez is better, but playing at their peaks there isn't much between them. Some of the goals RVP has scored are on par if not better than those Suarez has scored. It's a shame RVP can't keep fit he would have smashed most premier league scoring records.
 
Not sure if it hasn't already been discussed but RVP does score a lot more goals against bigger teams , while Suarez does like to fill his boots against the likes of Norwich.
 
Taking points of your immediate rivals normally wins you the title, if Suarez showed up against the likes of Chelsea and City last season Liverpool would have won the title. In comparison RVP's first season he scored goals against City, Chelsea and Arsenal (games we ended up winning), you can make your own judgements from that fact.
 
That's the spirit.





Though, I just meant their recentlish form. WC, you know. :cool:


Suarez scored two goals in two games at the World Cup against two good sides, Van Persie scored a single more goal in many more games, one of which came against Australia and two against a Spain team that performed absolutely atrociously.

You can't call it "Poor form" because he got banned. He's just an idiot.
 
Suarez scored two goals in two games at the World Cup against two good sides, Van Persie scored a single more goal in many more games, one of which came against Australia and two against a Spain team that performed absolutely atrociously.

You can't call it "Poor form" because he got banned. He's just an idiot.

England played 2 teams? Why the hell didnt we win with 22 players?
 
Two goals in two games against two good sides. Heh, that's a great way to say he scored two against England. Rooney actually played better than him in that game I'd say.

Robin wasn't impressive either yeah, but had a masterful appearance against Spain. And just watch him ann...des...r...mur...show how it's done against Brazil.
 
Two goals in two games against two good sides. Heh, that's a great way to say he scored two against England. Rooney actually played better than him in that game I'd say.

Robin wasn't impressive either yeah, but had a masterful appearance against Spain. And just watch him ann...des...r...mur...show how it's done against Brazil.

You missed the word 'Crack' out of your username if you believe that ;)
 
I do believe that. Don't think I'm the only cr...one though. Am I?

Suarez does beat him 2-1 in goals department, but overall, Rooney looked better to me. Oh well.
 
Have always been a RVP fan but Saurez is better footballer... Van has aspect in his game that is unmatched but it stops at him as an individual, whilst Suarez can be having a poor game and still be a positive influence..
 
:lol:

Also, England, "good?" Bottom of their group without a win. They certainly aren't good.

They are compared to Australia. Also, the results we had clearly didn't reflect our true abilities. We played well in all three games but were rather unlucky to only pick up a point. Didn't deserve to lose either against Uruguay or Italy and were by far the better side against CR but Sturridge's inability to finish cost us.

If we're going to say England aren't good then nor are Spain, considering they got smashed by an average side (on paper) in Holland and comfortably beat by a decent but far from world-class outfit in Chile. Then they beat Australia, one of the worst sides in the competition.

We're not "good" if you're comparing us to some of the best sides but we're better than some of the teams faced like Iran and not just an easy way to score goals.
 
What? He scored 2 goals in 2 games. They both came against England but the facts are the same. In two matches he managed two goals.

I know I was joking because you said against 2 good teams ;)
 
I wonder, if Suarez scored 25 goals last season instead of 31, would people still say he's the best player since Ronaldo? Some would, but 6 extra goals against some bottom half teams have made him the 3th best player in the world apparently.

Don't believe the hype man, overall RVP edges it for sure, Suarez is very close but still.