4-3-3 uses wingers? How do you work that out? Does it use wingers if you play 3 strikers? Would messi, RVP and Suarez up front be using wingers or strikers, or maybe simply using strikers who can play out wide or come inside?
Playing Valencia RVP and Giggs for instance is an alternate example of a 4-3-3 with 2 wingers or midfielders playing either side of one striker. These 2 players will stay wide and rarely make runs inside or ahead of the striker. Making it effectively a 4-5-1 instead of a 4-3-3. there is no other difference between a 4-5-1 and a 4-3-3. One uses non strikers in the wide positions, the other uses strikers out wide.
So the personnel and the job they are going to fulfill most regularly is what defines a system.
Iirc you suggested to Plato the other week that we play 4-2-3-1. I strongly disagree, while suggesting 4-2-3-1 should be our system of choice in my view. 4-2-3-1 is not played with wingers, it is played with players like Hazard Kagawa and Robben, in front of 2 defensive minded mids and behind a striker. The wide players come inside more than go outside, which overloads the central area. Do we really play a system where we see that?
I suggest because we don't play like that is why we struggle with our passing game. Our players are much farther apart than they would be in a 4-2-3-1. Madrid play 4-2-3-1, but we certainly don't. We play one DM and then use an AM as a CM next to him. Our wide players are not narrow and they rarely come inside. So what we use most often is a 4-4-2 when we defend and a 4-2-4 when we attack, which is why we are so open to counters in midfield.
Players define systems by the jobs they provide in any given role. Surely you must appreciate how the same system but with different types of players in the wide areas will predominantly give you different things, which redefines any system accordingly.
‘Kinell apotheosis. I think you’re confused and taking the term wingers a bit literally to mean an old fashioned chalk on their boots winger, when I was just talking about their nominal position on the pitch, which would be on the left or right wing. Hence 4-3-3 uses wingers because it uses players on the wings. Being played on the wing doesn’t mean you hug the touchline anymore, which is why people refer to ‘modern’ or ‘traditional’ wingers. I mean when we play Kagawa or Rooney on the wing they both cut inside. Really weird argument seeing as you know all that. All I am saying is that if Fergie uses a 4-3-3 then he’ll need to play two of the forwards on the wing, no matter if they are normally strikers, classic wingers, modern wingers… whatever.
With your question would Messi and Suarez be used as strikers or wingers if they flanked Van Perise, then without question wingers. That doesn’t mean they won’t cut inside the way Silva, Iniesta, Rooney, Muller etc do. But their general position on the pitch would be the left/right wing and they absolutely wouldn’t be played as strikers. Do you know many teams that play three strikers nowadays?
As I said in another thread.. Most teams use wingers, bar the odd three at the back formation that you see in Italy the vast majority of teams play with wide men. The main difference is they use these false wingers that the Caf love so much, that in theory aren't as 'one dimensional' as ours. Whatever approach teams take to personnel, you cannot just cede whole areas of a football pitch and have a big cluster feck in the middle. Even Barca who have a collection of the most talented central players need to position some of the wide. Over the past few seasons Villa, Iniesta and Fabregas get played out of position despite it not getting the best out of them individually.
So when people say we should 'play without wingers' its only going to result in playing less typical wingers in a wide role, you will generally always need someone going out there. Which is exactly what you are talking about now with your Suarez and Messi example – they will still need to go wide as you can’t just play on a tiny segment of a football pitch. It's just mental. In terms of United you make out we’ll be really successful if we play attacking midfielders on the wing, when it hasn't got the best out of Rooney, Kagawa or Welbeck. You really overrate that way of playing.
If you want to reply to something I said to Plato then bump the thread. However saying 4-2-3-1 doesn’t use wingers is just ridiculous. Benitez’s Valencia is one of the classic examples and they had Vicente Rodríguez on the left. We use it now as Kagwa and Rooney aren't strikers, yet we use Valencia and Young.
‘There is no other difference between a 4-5-1 and a 4-3-3. One uses non strikers in the wide positions, the other uses strikers out wide.’ You have just pulled this out your arse, it’s complete shite. Mourinho’s Chelsea played 4-3-3 and they had Robben and Duff on the wings. Were they strikers?