The frustrating thing is that we've had all window knowing we were short on goals, low on attacking numbers, and planning to offload two or three others.
We should have had a good list of options, and been spending the window getting into a position to activate the loans when we (finally) managed to start loaning players out.
Many are now downplaying Tel - 'the club were right to pull out of a deal for a raw 19 year old, struggling for goals and games, and who we'd only be helping develop for Bayern', etc. That's all fine - I agree he's a player we probably shouldn't have targeted. However, what that ignores is that we seem to have spent all the window with him being named as one of the two only options (along with Nkunku) that we were considering!
Why the hell spend all that time of the window coming to the conclusion that Tel was the right choice to go for, when most are now saying - probably rightly - that the club did the right thing not going for him as he wasn't the answer to our problems. The club seemed to have spent the window thinking he was, until coming to the same conclusion on transfers deadline day - and then the line is any alternative addition would be a 'panic buy'.
It wouldn't have been if we'd moved on from Tel ages ago and considered more appropriate options earlier in the window and got negotiations started, ready to proceed as soon as we could.
That sounds incompetent. Though, personally, I suspect there was never actually any intention of bringing another attacker in anyway and it was all just half hearted stuff before backing out and hiding behind the 'not making mistakes of the past' line.