Sparky_Hughes
I am Shitbeard.
- Joined
- Mar 26, 2008
- Messages
- 17,567
Go easy on DT. She is only a girl
Theres a girl here?!? What... like......a REAL one?
Go easy on DT. She is only a girl
Why? Is Oates a girl? That makes the Oates/Penna dynamic much more interesting.Ahh ok thanks, I knew I was being foolish
You better hope oates doesn't see this
Nah, Moyes has never heard of them, since they weren't on the radar for Everton and he knows no football outside of that.
What does that post even mean anyway, DT? That you/us know about these players and know that they're available and would be good signings, but the club know less than you/us? Is it just another way to make a silly dig at the club and those running it?
I've no idea why so many "supporters" are keen to run the club down this summer. That's not support.
Nah, Moyes has never heard of them, since they weren't on the radar for Everton and he knows no football outside of that.
What does that post even mean anyway, DT? That you/us know about these players and know that they're available and would be good signings, but the club know less than you/us? Is it just another way to make a silly dig at the club and those running it?
I've no idea why so many "supporters" are keen to run the club down this summer. That's not support.
I'm not sure anyone said that. The worry about selling him to Chelsea is a legitimate concern. I'm past the point of caring whether Rooney stays or goes now, but I'd rather not see him at Chelsea.That's not being a drama queen that's a legitimate solution to a legitimate problem. Being a drama queen is "OH NOES If rooney goes to Chelsea it will be a disaster, we might not win the league for ONE WHOLE SEASON OMG!?!?!
Can I be the first to coin the term "Moyes Boys"
Because they see the sugar daddy clubs spunking cash like water and cannt get over the fact we aren't.
I said before the transfer window opened that fellaini and possibly baines would be our summer signings. I got a load of abuse for saying it...most abuse coming from peterstorey
It was nice to look at Scholesy's ingenious passing but he really wasn't our driving team force in his last season. Fletcher thing is almost like some kind of a tragedy, I agree and I hope he won't end like Hargreaves.
I can honestly say, we could sign Strootman, Fellaini, Wanyama, Cabaye and few others, without smallest problems. Instead, we pursued absolute elite footballer, Cesc Fabregas, who's very emotionally attached to his home club. It was a right move.
Transfer window still on, with lots of possibilities.
They wanted to make a splash and it didn't work. It was a departure from our normal low-key dealings in the transfer market but I'm sure Woodward and Moyes had their reasons. I'm not defending our actions in the transfer market. We've blown hot and cold on this front for a number of years now and it was nice to see the club make such a bold move.
It was always not good to change the spine of the management wholesale. I am surprised the board sanctioned it. You never do it in any company so why should United be an exception.
Poor succession planning.
You mean Gill, I take it? But he left at a time when Fergie's mind wasn't made up yet. At least as far as we know. Fergie could've kept on going for a couple of seasons more - or he might've called it quits last May, if it hadn't been for a single Aguero goal...Hard to plan succession in such circumstances. The Fergie factor has made United an exception to most rules, that's just the way it is - and by and large it's been an enormous blessing for us.
I am sure Gill would have been made aware of the situation vis a vis Fergie's thoughts of retiring. Maybe Gill should have staying on another year to do a proper management handover.
Could be, certainly. We won't know until Fergie's new book - at the earliest.
Anyway, let's not forget that both Fergie and Gill remain on board, literally speaking. It's not like they just stepped down and vanished. They're around if they're needed, that's even part of the strategy - as it has been presented to the world at large, at least.
So we basically only won the league because of SAF and Chelsea and City messing it up?
I think that's a bit too simplistic.
Do I think we need improving in midfield?
Of course, especially when it comes to Europe we are miles behind the other big teams and need to strengthen if we want to win another CL in the near future but in the league we rarely ever meat teams that totally dominate us in midfield so I feel the lads are good enough to win us the league again this year.
That's spot on, mate! Unfortunately, the sugar daddy clubs aren't just ruining football, they are ruining people and their perceptions of real life also. When Chelsea and City started their paths towards *cough* glory, too many United supporters started screaming for big name signings. Look what happened at Chelsea and what seems to happen at City, then look at what Ferguson did and where United are now. Maybe we should just admit that we are indeed very small fish in our own fish bowl that knows about f**** all when it comes to these matters.
Buy, buy, buy isn't the United way, and if some of the fans think that we should splash all that money on big name signings perhaps they are indeed supporting the wrong team?
Let's imagine that United bought Fabregas, Baines, Bale and some other plonker. All those players would demand first team action, which means that four of our current crop would have to give way. Would we want that much change in a winning team? I think there's a saying about it somewhere
Everyone seems to unanimously agree that Fellaini isn't a good passer of the ball, which is why I find it a little bizarre that they're happy to have him in our midfield, a midfield that has mostly prided itself on having high quality passers who rarely lose possession (well, except Anderson, but he's just a big old chunky anomaly).
Its okay, we've only lost Scholes from the squad. There's no way we'll miss his passing... No way at all...
Everyone seems to unanimously agree that Fellaini isn't a good passer of the ball, which is why I find it a little bizarre that they're happy to have him in our midfield, a midfield that has mostly prided itself on having high quality passers who rarely lose possession (well, except Anderson, but he's just a big old chunky anomaly).
His passing isnt anything special but his attacking qualities isnt why I'd be happy to him here. He'd add much needed steel to our CM and also provide cover for Carrick. I do think that Fellaini alone wouldnt be enough for our midfield though and it'd be a luxury for most games we play but he'd still be better than nothing at all and would improve our CM.
Ideally though, I'd want a more accomplished attacking CM with a cheaper cover for Carrick. If that doesnt happen, I'd rather Fellaini than nothing at all. He's a better player than most here think though.
That's the problem though isn't it? It's like people are happy to settle for a not-overly-good midfielder who would cost us around £24m when we could probably get Cabaye and McCarthy for that price.
Scholes was largely meaningless last year, but even our not overly brilliant midfielders in the last few years are very good passers. Take Cleverley as an example, doesn't really excel at anything in particular but he is very reliable on the ball.
Because they see the sugar daddy clubs spunking cash like water and cannt get over the fact we aren't.