Yes, we have discussed what might be called the 'nuance effect' before and maybe disagree about certain aspects, but that is how we (individually) see things. I believe politicians (in general) give nuance a 'bad name', but lets not go down that route again.
I don't think you are old fashioned as you put it, for wanting the truth, from anyone, not just those who rule us; but the world as an entity these days seems to accept only 'versions' of the truth.Therefore quite often it is depending on who is telling it, proposing it and/or from what perspective they take; hence the
fake news we hear about.
My personal complaint is that this situation has come about through a combination of 24/7 rolling news and social media outlets that tend to become 'echo chambers'.
It is a long time since I heard anyone actually just....
read the News. On TV, the News Readers became News Correspondents, who became Specialist News Editors, etc. it is (in my opinion) why people tend to only read and to go off headlines alone, because usually everything that follows is just someones own view of what has happened and what might result from something that has happened.
Of course News editors, reporters, journalists of almost any description probably do have the
inside track and hence can make comment , or feel they can... but of course, their code of honour stops them revealing their 'sources'... yes very convenient, you might think?
You are right about excusing lying, and you are right that I don't approve of excusing lying, I am simply saying what I see in front of me, or perceive from what I hear.
An old colleague of mine (fairly cynically) use to tell me "The public don't want the truth...they couldn't live with it". sometimes I think about that and wonder.
I enjoy our exchanges, thank you very much.