Adisa
likes to take afvanadva wothowi doubt
Not sure where this belongs, but it's slightly reassuring that the papers don't have as much influence as is thought.
Ouch!
Not sure where this belongs, but it's slightly reassuring that the papers don't have as much influence as is thought.
Why wouldn't you trust the FT?
Rees-Mogg's now the favourite among many bookmakers to be the next Tory leader.
The Conservative party risks being seen as the party of “nostalgia, hard Brexit, austerity and lazy privilege”, Theresa May’s policy chief warned earlier this year.
Rees-Mogg v Corbyn... would certainly be a spectacle.Rees-Mogg's now the favourite among many bookmakers to be the next Tory leader.
Rees-Mogg v Corbyn... would certainly be a spectacle.
Rees-Mogg v Corbyn... would certainly be a spectacle.
Good lord. Quitting as an MSP?The feck...Kezia Dugdale going on I'm a Celebrity?
Good lord. Quitting as an MSP?
Of their losses 3 have to Labour, one LD and one Tory. So it looks like they're swinging left.Best thing is seeing the continued eradication of UKIP.
Yes quite possibly. The BBC and the current conservative government(Going back to the Cameron days)and linked together quite well, only recently senior people from the BBC went after the job of being Theresa Mays director of communications(The job eventually going to a former BBC employer), Andrew Neil the BBC biggest political big shot had also worked for the tories(There are many more cases as well). Although this isn't really the point, it's not really a pro bias but more thatHonestly? As dodgy as this one is I don't think the scandal is that they have been bought off or have been pressured not to run it. The scandal is how absolutely shocking reporting of science/academia is in general. Journalists simply do not understand what they are reporting on, and it gives people like Fiona Fox, in this instance, scope to exploit the ignorance.
Things like the Peer Review process are badly understood, and I don't really know why. Presumably because paying people with the credentials to comment on technical information is more expensive than shoving it the way of someone who will hash up something that will convince 90% of the general public.
http://www.huckmagazine.com/perspectives/opinion-perspectives/bbc-bias-tom-mills/The professional instincts of those at the BBC who regularly make editorial decisions on behalf of the public are necessarily political. The notion of ‘bias’ though doesn’t quite capture what is going on. It is not that these individuals might be acting on secret political prejudices, although of course they may. Rather the risk is that a certain shared understanding of politics becomes formed around tight cliques, which are not only unrepresentative of the public, but have an increasingly tenuous grasp on political reality.
In an amazing turn of events, overnight the Tories have redefined the full in full employment.
The Trump line about him being able to shoot someone isn't far off when it comes to the Tories and the British media. The Appeaser doesn't get dolled up for Dacre for nothing.If that was Dianne Abbot the media would have had a field day.
Anyone watching the Budget?
Unfortunately.
I think I actually hate this government.
You think?
I wonder what the budget u-turn will be this time around.
Hammond acting like some wannabe stand up comedian FFS.
You're not funny you wanker and you're ruining people's lives.
There's an attempted zinger after every line it's actually embarrassing.
Seems like he's trying to relate and boost his popularity, not a chance they'll give you the leadership phillip