What a shambolic government, equally tragic is that they're still polling at around 40%. Not sure what's worse, that or Trump somehow still sitting at 33% approval.
Look at the alternative.
Yeah, it's polarising. The old phrase 'be careful what you wish for' could maybe have been written for the 'they're all the same' brigade.
The head of our practice, who is a fully paid up member of the Labour Party, didn't vote for Labour at the last election, for the simple reason that McDonnell is a Marxist.
Looks good to me.Look at the alternative.
I assume you know why Israel occupied the Golan Heights?
Lots of members of Parliament are "friends of Israel" (not a euphamism - google it)and take some nice cash from them. Israel knows it is as popular as a fart in a space suit and has been offering such "holidays" and opportunities for "speaking tours" for years.So why has Priti Patel got such a hard on for Israel?
This.Lots of members of Parliament are "friends of Israel" (not a euphamism - google it)and take some nice cash from them. Israel knows it is as popular as a fart in a space suit and has been offering such "holidays" and opportunities for "speaking tours" for years.
I'm saying this as a cynic rather than a tinfoil hat wearing conspiracy theorist about Global Zionist conspiracy stuff! It's just pragmatic lobbying to try and get some people to NOT criticise the actions of the Israeli government which has increasingly been led by thugs and extremists.
They do like the power they wield over people.
Water.
The times where an elevated position was necessary to effectively shell your opposition are over since the end of WW2.
Rich water reserves in an otherwise pretty dry environment however, are *very* useful, if you are running an ambitious agricultural industry at the same time.
He works for ITV.By the way Preston is just a failed Sports Journalist, shows how much the BBC is scrapping the barrel on Political Commentators these days.
He works for ITV.
I suspect its because they are losing that power, or certainly their grip on such power and hence they are now using a 'scatter gun' approach to anything involving politicians, e.g. tracking Patel's car back from the airport via helicopter would be laughable, if it had been undertaken by a lesser Broadcaster, its embarrassing when undertaken by the BBC.
Social media is taking over here as much as in the USA, as an avenue for people to get their news (whether true or fake) The BBC and other 24/7 news channels are becoming desperate, recent suggestions that Sky News (costs a fortune) is likely to be jettisoned to facilitate the merger between Sky and Fox, is a prime example.
By the way Preston is just a failed Sports Journalist, shows how much the BBC is scrapping the barrel on Political Commentators these days.
He works for ITV.
You must be thinking of Robert Savage
He's been an economics and business journo since the early 90s.He does now, but in a former existence he use to do articles for the BBC Sports Page, usually about the FA debacles on bidding for WC's, etc. think he also did some on other sports, mainly Olympics, he wasn't much good at it, so not surprising he turned to politics.
He's been an economics and business journo since the early 90s
Which is an interesting revision of history, given that Israel brought up Syria shelling Israel from the Golan Heights as late as 1966.
But then you have to ask why Syria did that.
http://www.nytimes.com/1997/05/11/world/general-s-words-shed-a-new-light-on-the-golan.html
Historians have already begun to debate whether General Dayan was giving an accurate account of the situation in 1967 or whether his version of what happened was colored by his disgrace after the 1973 Middle East war, when he was forced to resign as Defense Minister over the failure to anticipate the Arab attack.
Did you miss this part?
It doesn't say anything about it not being true though does it. I could debate whether you are a rabbit or not.
It means you can't just assume that a conversation had by a now dead Israeli general many years after his public disgrace is necessarily true.
Sorry if I seem a bit snappy, but I get pissed about the modern reactions to anything Israel. They are more than deserving of condemnation over many of their actions over the last few decades, but people seem to forget the entire circumstances that country faced in the decades following the war. The same people who had faced annihilation in the holocaust then faced immediate attempts to wipe them out again from pretty much the moment their new country existed. Then decades of constant attacks from their neighbours all with the aim of snuffing out their existence. If any country on earth had a right to be paranoid it was Israel, and it's lead them along a dark path as they have become so much stronger, but back then they were still very much the victims.
It means you can't just assume that a conversation had by a now dead Israeli general many years after his public disgrace is necessarily true.
Sorry if I seem a bit snappy, but I get pissed about the modern reactions to anything Israel. They are more than deserving of condemnation over many of their actions over the last few decades, but people seem to forget the entire circumstances that country faced in the decades following the war. The same people who had faced annihilation in the holocaust then faced immediate attempts to wipe them out again from pretty much the moment their new country existed. Then decades of constant attacks from their neighbours all with the aim of snuffing out their existence. If any country on earth had a right to be paranoid it was Israel, and it's lead them along a dark path as they have become so much stronger, but back then they were still very much the victims.
You make a really valid point there Kentonio about the early days of Israel and the threats they faced back then. what a shame this seems to have led the government down some dark paths.
I'm not assuming it's definitely true but was just pointing out (ambiguously to be fair, so sorry for that) that there are other interpretations of what happened which are potentially valid.
£££.So why has Priti Patel got such a hard on for Israel?
Idk exactly, but maybe, given her family history, she might have been hugely impressed by the Entebbe hostage rescue when she was a little girl.So why has Priti Patel got such a hard on for Israel?
In an amazing twist The Appeaser has managed to find someone thicker than Vacant to take over her job.
No doubt she is a dreadful women but deffo in the naughty crush stakes.