Westminster Politics

Isn't July the 1st the last chance for the UK to extend the transition period for brexit?

I'd imagine stupid Boris and his boss will want to continue until that date at least.
 
I wonder if, the next time Whitty or Vallance are at a daily briefing, they will be asked if they support Cummings decisions.
 
Why have they chosen such a relatively distant date?
No idea, 21 days seems fairly random, especially given you'd expect pressure to fade rather than build, on balance.
 
I wonder if, the next time Whitty or Vallance are at a daily briefing, they will be asked if they support Cummings decisions.
normally the questions go to the minister and then they call on an expert if they want them to answer the question
even if somebody did ask them direct I suspect they would say they are not political experts and the minister would simply call somebody else for a question
 
I wonder if, the next time Whitty or Vallance are at a daily briefing, they will be asked if they support Cummings decisions.
I'd be surprised if we see them there until this blows over.
As with Trump, health experts are only welcomed at briefings if they're 'onside'.
 
but the political experts think Cummings will be gone in the middle of June.

I thought Cummings was the Political expert??
What odds are being quoted?

DC could make a killing here... fill your boots!
Just a thought Dom, wonder if you have considered buying any shares in any local Barnard Castle enterprises, you've certainly put them on the tourist map! "Every cloud etc..."
 
Well the Chinese government part I have no clue about but my instinct is it sounds more like a nice story to tell to fit with their subsequent claim rather than it actually having been a systematic aspect of Chinese propaganda as they imply - happy to be corrected on this though if that indeed was the case.

As for the latter part about it all being a calculated power grab by Cummings after which dissenting historians will be shot...as I said, are we supposed to take that seriously?

It's certainly a feature of totalitarianism and from the books I've read on Mao and the Nazis it is very much one aspect they practiced. I've not read it in ages but the Origins of Totalitarianism would be a much more uncomfortable read these days. An obvious lie isn't meant to instil a false truth it's meant as an act of domination to stamp where the power is and erode peoples integrity because by repeating such lies it makes them complicit and binded to them.

Senior cabinet members were out in force demeaning themselves repeating Doms lie because of the power he has over them. As were all the hard right journalists and Tory bots. I don't think Dom expected that lie to work but he expected Leave voters to sing to his tune which is a win. The fact he got them to deny the initial claim and then repeat a new lie is all the more totalitarianism 101.

The final part of that post is obviously bollocks though.
 
Well the Chinese government part I have no clue about but my instinct is it sounds more like a nice story to tell to fit with their subsequent claim rather than it actually having been a systematic aspect of Chinese propaganda as they imply - happy to be corrected on this though if that indeed was the case.

As for the latter part about it all being a calculated power grab by Cummings after which dissenting historians will be shot...as I said, are we supposed to take that seriously?

Exactly what I was going to say but couldn't find a way of saying it so concisely

I can't see it having been a coordinated policy, more something that someone analysing it after the fact comes up with as a narrative that fits neatly with the events

People always assume that Governments are acting in a coordinated, rational and calculated manner with each decision and each public announcement geared towards achieving some higher-aim but in reality they are probably just blundering around reacting to random events like the rest of us!
 
I thought Cummings was the Political expert??
What odds are being quoted?

DC could make a killing here... fill your boots!
Just a thought Dom, wonder if you have considered buying any shares in any local Barnard Castle enterprises, you've certainly put them on the tourist map! "Every cloud etc..."
You're quoting me as saying that, when I was just relaying a press release. Next big scandal incoming- Cummings flouts related persons betting rules!
 
You're quoting me as saying that, when I was just relaying a press release. Next big scandal incoming- Cummings flouts related persons betting rules!

Ha, Ha! yes, he's more likely to get fired for that... especially if he didn't tell Boris first!
 
It's certainly a feature of totalitarianism and from the books I've read on Mao and the Nazis it is very much one aspect they practiced. I've not read it in ages but the Origins of Totalitarianism would be a much more uncomfortable read these days. An obvious lie isn't meant to instil a false truth it's meant as an act of domination to stamp where the power is and erode peoples integrity because by repeating such lies it makes them complicit and binded to them.

Senior cabinet members were out in force demeaning themselves repeating Doms lie because of the power he has over them. As were all the hard right journalists and Tory bots. I don't think Dom expected that lie to work but he expected Leave voters to sing to his tune which is a win. The fact he got them to deny the initial claim and then repeat a new lie is all the more totalitarianism 101.

The final part of that post is obviously bollocks though.
'They will tell you what justice is.'

Anyway, aside from any grand schemes, they've probably learnt that lies work - if for instance, if I routinely posted that I'm a billionaire, some - even if only a tiny minority - might end up believing it; result.
 
It's certainly a feature of totalitarianism and from the books I've read on Mao and the Nazis it is very much one aspect they practiced. I've not read it in ages but the Origins of Totalitarianism would be a much more uncomfortable read these days. An obvious lie isn't meant to instil a false truth it's meant as an act of domination to stamp where the power is and erode peoples integrity because by repeating such lies it makes them complicit and binded to them.

Senior cabinet members were out in force demeaning themselves repeating Doms lie because of the power he has over them. As were all the hard right journalists and Tory bots. I don't think Dom expected that lie to work but he expected Leave voters to sing to his tune which is a win. The fact he got them to deny the initial claim and then repeat a new lie is all the more totalitarianism 101.

The final part of that post is obviously bollocks though.

Exactly, I fully accept that some governments lie in that manner and for the purposes that you propose. But someone writing that it was a systematic feature of Chinese propaganda in the 80s/90s to me just sounds more like someone coming up with something that sounds interesting and plausible to give their views credibility, and it's not the sort of thing you can easily disprove. I suppose I'm especially suspicious of it occurring at a time where views hostile to China seem to be gaining more prominence.
 
Quote from another board. My own opinion isn't as hardline as this but the scenario remains a possibility, I guess:

'The 'testing my eyesight' story it a two-pronged attack. Firstly it's a distraction from the real issue and a way of making light of something that is actually very serious.

Secondly and more disturbingly, it's a way for the government to readjust the way we think about the truth.

The majority of people know that this isn't the truth, but the government is very publicly telling us it is the truth.

For the government to decide that they know it's not true, we know its not true but we are betting that we can put this out there and get away with it is very sinister indeed. A sign of things to come if these lunatics stay in power.'
 
Exactly what I was going to say but couldn't find a way of saying it so concisely

I can't see it having been a coordinated policy, more something that someone analysing it after the fact comes up with as a narrative that fits neatly with the events

People always assume that Governments are acting in a coordinated, rational and calculated manner with each decision and each public announcement geared towards achieving some higher-aim but in reality they are probably just blundering around reacting to random events like the rest of us!

It's a fundamental misunderstanding of Cummings' character too. As contemptible a person as he is, it cannot be said that he aspires to public attention, hence the press conference can only be interpreted as a concession on his part, a recognition of the problem created by his actions. Likewise, he does not at all seem the type to care what historians write about him. They'd just be dismissed as liberal Remoaners bitter about being outsmarted by him. In fact I'd go as far as to say the exact opposite is true - he seems the sort who'd love to be treated as some sort of villain in history books. It would only feed his ego.
 
Boris is 'self first', so I can't really see him sacking Cummings now. If he is seen to succumb to this sort of pressure then the rest of his time as PM will be limited, internal Tory machinations will see to that, and with an 80-seat majority and the best part of 4/5 years to go to the next GE, why would he do that?
If he shows any doubt, or as others would say show 'weakness' now, then all his future intentions, whether it be Brexit of anything else, will go up in flames, he will become a lame-duck barely 12 months into his premiership.

A lot of people are rightly upset and angry about what they see as 'one law...etc.' but Boris will have to take that on the chin, accept that his ratings will nose-dive (maybe even further than they have now), and soldier on.

You can bet on one thing for certain if Cummings goes so will Boris, maybe not right away but not long after, and of course that is a unifying aim which will rally the opposition. Starmer has to play this carefully, he can't afford to be seen wielding the knife as that will scare tory rebels, but he has to be there to lead the charge afterwards, it will take some doing, is he up to it, can he earn his spurs?
 
If he shows any doubt, or as others would say show 'weakness' now, then all his future intentions, whether it be Brexit of anything else, will go up in flames, he will become a lame-duck barely 12 months into his premiership
Which only goes to show how hidebound and stale such ways of thinking are. And how idiotic the 'strong leader' concept is.
 
Exactly what I was going to say but couldn't find a way of saying it so concisely

I can't see it having been a coordinated policy, more something that someone analysing it after the fact comes up with as a narrative that fits neatly with the events

People always assume that Governments are acting in a coordinated, rational and calculated manner with each decision and each public announcement geared towards achieving some higher-aim but in reality they are probably just blundering around reacting to random events like the rest of us!

The truth is somewhere in between. The reason Cummings has got so far is because he's been able to control media narrative to political advantage in the past. Gove credits him with twice saving his career in the early days by doing so. The infamous big red bus lie was Cummings's strategy. The primary aim of it wasn't to convince people that we could better fund the NHS if we left the EU but to cause a media shitstorm and really light a fire under the Brexit debate. Cummings admits that it worked much better than even he anticipated.

They do have calculated strategy, if it works in this case is a different matter. I guess it depends on what the end is. If Boris really believes that he needs Cummings for Brexit no matter what and is balancing that against a short term battering in public confidence then they might just get away with it.
 
Last edited:
On the contrary, if you look around the world such concepts are in vogue.
True but its popularity doesn't guarantee that it's worth anything besides its use in gaining the cheapest kind of victories.
 
True but its popularity doesn't guarantee that it's worth anything besides its use in gaining the cheapest kind of victories.

Also true, and nothing last forever, we all get our day in the sun, good or bad and the old saying about we never learn from history is very apt. You have to ask yourself why is the 'strong leader' thing, which was much reviled after the chaos of WW2, is making a comeback.

Of course everyone has their pet view, mine is that across the world, especially in many first world countries, the so called silent majority is getting p**ssed off with their lot and want change, and there is always a 'strong leader' there to oblige... just a thought!
 


As said earlier in this thread, it’s difficult for any politician to recover when their image becomes the focus of ridicule which is the case with almost all the current cabinet.
 
As said earlier in this thread, it’s difficult for any politician to recover when their image becomes the focus of ridicule which is the case with almost all the current cabinet.


Rubbish. All through Thatcher's reign we had Spitting Image yet the pols were fine. They all loved the attention.
 
Rubbish. All through Thatcher's reign we had Spitting Image yet the pols were fine. They all loved the attention.

That‘s different though. There’s a huge difference between Spitting Image’s cartoon caricatures which often sent up the image the politicians were themselves attempting to portray and the acerbic ridicule you find on social media which is calculated character assassination.

The likes of Johnson, Cummings, Hancock, Gove, Patel, Raab and co are getting the same treatment Corbyn and Abbott received and it’s not easy to recover from.
 
It depends on the nature of the ridicule, always. You can bet your life that Mrs Thatcher relished being portrayed as the only strong man in her government...that is, if she'd ever looked at a television screen.
 
It depends on the nature of the ridicule, always. You can bet your life that Mrs Thatcher relished being portrayed as the only strong man in her government...that is, if she'd ever looked at a television screen.
Certainly David Steel is on recording as stating his Spitting Image caricature as a tiny man in David Owen's pocket had a significant impact on his career
 
Certainly David Steel is on recording as stating his Spitting Image caricature as a tiny man in David Owen's pocket had a significant impact on his career
Yeah. I have a poor memory yet even I can remember 'killer' lines from those Steel/Owen sketches, none of them flattering to Steel.
 
The truth is somewhere in between. The reason Cummings has got so far is because he's been able to control media narrative to political advantage in the past. Gove credits him with twice saving his career in the early days by doing so. The infamous big red bus lie was Cummings's strategy. The primary aim of it wasn't to convince people that we could better fund the NHS if we left the EU but to cause a media shitstorm and really light a fire under the Brexit debate. Cummings admits that it worked much better than even he anticipated.

They do have calculated strategy, if it works in the case is a different matter. I guess it depends on what the end is. If Boris really believes that he needs Cummings for Brexit no matter what and is balancing that against a short term battering in public confidence then they might just get away with it.
The difference with the big red bus lie was that Cummings and Boris had a large BrExit seeking constituency hoping he’d be right as well as it being an amazing benefit if it were true.

This context of this recent set of lies is totally different: there is no pro Covid19 vote base, 99% of the population have suffered by taking opposite decisions to his, with a vocal minority seriously suffering from emotional or psychological trauma because of that. And IF Cummings did have the rights to trust his ‘instincts’, then that must mean the other 99% are worse parents for not having done the same.

Cummings decisions cannot garner empathy with a large enough constituency. Plus he also further antogonised the media in his excuses, and they won’t ever forget that.

Lies are a dangerous business because you have to tell increasingly bigger ones to defend to original lie. As those require others to lie for you. Tory Ministers, MP’s and media outriders already sound ridiculous trying to defend him. That is not sustainable under ferocious and sustained scrutiny.

As social distancing measures relax, I can see families and friends of those who died (including Tory and Leave voters) attending protests, sharing more tragic stories and becoming further entrenched in their outrage. Their shared experience will unify them. It actually the perfect project for a group like Momentum to organise and propagate.

Even if Cummings survives a few weeks, is he able to perform his role as belligerent enforcer amongst Tory Government and civil service any more? He becomes a lame duck. Which in turn makes Boris one too. Cummings position has become untenable.
 
Last edited:
The difference with the big red bus lie was that Cummings and Boris had a large BrExit seeking constituency hoping he’d be right as well as it being an amazing benefit if it were true.

This context of this recent set of lies is totally different: there is no pro Covid19 vote base, 99% of the population have suffered by taking opposite decisions to his, with a vocal minority seriously suffering from emotional or psychological trauma because of that. And IF Cummings did have the rights to trust his ‘instincts’, then that must mean the other 99% are worse parents for not having done the same.

Cummings decisions cannot garner empathy with a large enough constituency. Plus he also further antogonised the media in his excuses, and they won’t ever forget that.

Lies are a dangerous business because you have to tell increasingly bigger ones to defend to original lie. As those require others to lie for you. Tory Ministers, MP’s and media outriders already sound ridiculous trying to defend him. That is not sustainable under ferocious and sustained scrutiny.

As social distancing measures relax, I can see families and friends of those who died (including Tory and Leave voters) attending protests, sharing more tragic stories and becoming further entrenched in their outrage. Their shared experience will unify them. It actually the perfect project for a group like Momentum to organise and propagate.

Even if Cummings survives a few weeks, is he able to perform his role as belligerent enforcer amongst Tory Government and civil service any more? He becomes a lame duck. Which in turn makes Boris one too. Cummings position has become untenable.

I don't disagree entirely. He's got so many enemies he's effectively been a dead man walking since they got into power. The press are still smarting about how he tried to control them in the run up to the election so are unlikely to let this drop.

I wasn't trying to say that this is a winning strategy, however. Just that his job is to try and manipulate media narrative and that he does use methods that ostensibly appear to be one thing when in fact they are another.
 
Last edited:
Rightfully getting slammed in the replies. Beyond tone death.



This definitely puts paid to the theory amongst some that he was the only decent member of the cabinet. Deliberate gaslighting and a failure to understand public mood.
 
'Highlights' from Boris Johnson's committee hearing:

"The last time a prime minister appeared before the committee was 12 months ago," Sir Bernard Jenkin said.

"Can you, prime minister, commit to attending regularly this and again before summer recess?"

Boris Johnson asks if he can get back to him on that as “there is a lot on at the moment.'”
-------

"Inquiry into Cummings' actions not a good use of official time" says Johnson.'
-------

'"We need to move on," says Johnson'
 
Boris getting roasted right now.

When will one of them ask ...what Is the hold that Cummings has over him (Boris) ?
 
Rightfully getting slammed in the replies. Beyond tone death.



..and now they've completed the set by having the uncle who doesn't understand that his attempts to be cool are actually very cringy and make him look like an absolute whopper. How can you be so shite at understanding people? This whole cabinet is fecking awful at empathy.
 
"Prime Minister, did you just steal my wallet?"
"No."
"Can you prove it?"
"Yes."
"Can I see the proof?"
"No."
"Why not?"
"Because it's magic."