Westminster Politics

They won't renegotiate the WA but could give another extension. Depends on Boris's behaviour I would guess.

The next few days are going to be interesting. In particular what type of Boris Johnson is he going to be now he is the PM.
He will do well to focus on the immediate problems rather than the bluster of defeating the fool Corbyn.
 
They won't renegotiate the WA but could give another extension. Depends on Boris's behaviour I would guess.

The only way you force such buffoon to his knees is to make him face reality. Let the UK walk without a deal, let the British economy burn and him facing the consequences of his BS. Then the voter would turn against him, he'll be kicked out in disgrace and the UK can finally return to the fold, accepting that adults should lead politics not clowns.
 
Oh come on they weren't that bad. Granted a bit posh but atleast one of them was happy with a more liberal Conservative leader!



Some of them maybe, those two were fine. Where is the tolerance from the liberals that they are so famed for? I'm guessing it doesn't count when it comes to Tories!



Or clever...

I take it you're a Tory then?
 
The next few days are going to be interesting. In particular what type of Boris Johnson is he going to be now he is the PM.
He will do well to focus on the immediate problems rather than the bluster of defeating the fool Corbyn.

Agreed, it's about time Boris grew up and faced reality. And are they really worried about Corbyn?
 
The only way you force such buffoon to his knees is to make him face reality. Let the UK walk without a deal, let the British economy burn and him facing the consequences of his BS. Then the voter would turn against him, he'll be kicked out in disgrace and the UK can finally return to the fold, accepting that adults should lead politics not clowns.

Yes it's fitting that he will have to deal with the reality concerning Brexit, be interesting to see his approach, he'll change directions constantly I would imagine to try to wriggle out of the blame .
 
Yes it's fitting that he will have to deal with the reality concerning Brexit, be interesting to see his approach, he'll change directions constantly I would imagine to try to wriggle out of the blame .

He will blame the EU for forcing the UK to leave without a deal and making any future negotiation difficult. His supporters will blindly believe him because they were likely against the EU in the first place.
 
The next few days are going to be interesting. In particular what type of Boris Johnson is he going to be now he is the PM.
He will do well to focus on the immediate problems rather than the bluster of defeating the fool Corbyn.
May's deal is the key I reckon. Somehow he has to get it through. Not sure how but some more 'clarification' from the EU maybe, or something concrete in the future arrangement that he can hang on to to say that the context has changed.
If he can pull it off and the UK leaves, with a deal on the 31st Oct then everything becomes possible for Johnson. The Brexit party, although pissed off, will cease to have a raison d'etre so the chance of losing votes to them disappears. With the Labour party as it is at present he could call GE and probably win by a decent margin. May's deal, even though the numbers last time out don't stack up, is still the path of least resistance IMO. Johnson's test is whether he can sell it better than May. Remember the deficit went from -230 to -149 to -58 which means he needs to get another 30 odd MP's to go for it.

For me that is the best outcome in all this.
 
Last edited:
Well in the US we re not that far removed from Trump calling for the destruction of those who oppose him, get ready for Boris to do the same. Time to move to.. I dunno.. New Zealand maybe?
I'd be on the next flight if someone would employ me :lol:
 
May's deal is the key I reckon. Somehow he has to get it through. Not sure how but some more 'clarification' from the EU maybe, or something concrete in the future arrangement that he can hang on to to say that the context has changed.
If he can pull it off and the UK leaves, with a deal on the 31st Oct then everything becomes possible for Johnson. The Brexit party, although pissed off, with cease to have a raison d'etre so the chance of losing votes to them disappears. With the Labour party as it is at present he could call GE and probably win by a decent margin. May's deal, even though the numbers last time out don't stack up, is still the path of least resistance IMO. Johnson's test is whether he can sell it better than May. Remember the deficit went from -230 to -149 to -58 which means he needs to get another 30 off MP's to go for it.

For me that is the best outcome in all this.

Considering Brexiteers who advocate this deal say we're not allowed to have a second vote on Brexit because that isn't democratic, why it's fine for parliament to have to vote for something again that's been resoundingly rejected?
 
The problem, though, is that with Corbyn at the helm for labour, who is there to hold this clown to account?

Politics is a real mess at the moment. Both main parties have, IMO, unelectable leaders. But alas, Bojo reigns.
 
I know but I don't find the UK system democratic at all and am sure every system has its faults but I'd prefer the president of the EU recommended by 28 heads of states and endorsed by the EU parliament than 160000 members of a political party deciding who is the PM of the UK.


But all Political Parties vote for their leader - one could argue that if Corbyn becomes PM next year, he was voted for as Leader by just Labour Party Members and his local constituents - not the other 20+ million voters

But Yes....I agree that the UK system is flawed.

People should be voting either for ( 1 ) Independent MPs to represent them - so no candidates' political party affiliation on the Ballot Paper, or ( 2 ) no candidates on the Ballot Paper, just a list of Political Parties and the MP will be assigned to the Constituency by the winning Party. I admit this second option is variation on the German system and something which I think is too bad to be true, but others might like it and approve of it.

The other thing, of course, is what I said a few days ago - in the case that a new PM is required ( resignation, death, etc ) then the a replacement PM should be chosen through a General Election, not as we've seen today.

As it is, the UK system seems to be the worst of all possibilities and pisses off nearly everyone, but especially the losers who then have a whole array of reasons to moan about - although I'd have to say that here on the Caf it's more like Red Square than Red Cafe most days, and all the Comrades moaning on here today conveniently forget that Brown took over from Blair as the UK's PM without even a vote not so long ago, and if there was a Labour Government, today, and a new PM required, it would probably be exactly the same again.
 
May's deal is the key I reckon. Somehow he has to get it through. Not sure how but some more 'clarification' from the EU maybe, or something concrete in the future arrangement that he can hang on to to say that the context has changed.
If he can pull it off and the UK leaves, with a deal on the 31st Oct then everything becomes possible for Johnson. The Brexit party, although pissed off, with cease to have a raison d'etre so the chance of losing votes to them disappears. With the Labour party as it is at present he could call GE and probably win by a decent margin. May's deal, even though the numbers last time out don't stack up, is still the path of least resistance IMO. Johnson's test is whether he can sell it better than May. Remember the deficit went from -230 to -149 to -58 which means he needs to get another 30 odd MP's to go for it.

For me that is the best outcome in all this.
Then why doesn't he? The hard work part of the rest would become academic as he'll have a majority to pass anything he wants.
 
Then why doesn't he? The hard work part of the rest would become academic as he'll have a majority to pass anything he wants.

I mean, there have been rumours he might. I think he'd win, but also arguably a mistake to call one - elections can be surprising and no guarantee things wouldn't change during a campaign.
 
I'm



I'm not a member of any political party - but you could have joined the Tory Party and voted if you feel so bad about it....

ANd let's not forget - I didn't vote for 27 of them because I wasn't allowed to, just like the other 500 million of us.

I'm pretty sure you can't sign up and vote immediately. I couldn't when I signed up for a Labour membership.
 
Oh come on they weren't that bad. Granted a bit posh but atleast one of them was happy with a more liberal Conservative leader!



Some of them maybe, those two were fine. Where is the tolerance from the liberals that they are so famed for? I'm guessing it doesn't count when it comes to Tories!



Or clever...
I have no idea what you mean by liberals in this sentence. It seems to be used here as Americans use it.
I'm guessing, given you're using the term to attack someone for not liking young Tories, that you are using it to mean tolerates anything. It doesn't.

feck the Tories, every one, old and young. A bunch of self serving power hungry elitist bastards who only have principles when it applies to fecking over the most vulnerable in society at which time fiscal prudence suddenly matters, or when it comes to expressing their creatively concealed racism in policy.
 
Then why doesn't he? The hard work part of the rest would become academic as he'll have a majority to pass anything he wants.
That is another way of looking at it. But he runs into the Brexit party if he calls a GE not having actually left the EU.
 
Oh come on they weren't that bad. Granted a bit posh but atleast one of them was happy with a more liberal Conservative leader!



Some of them maybe, those two were fine. Where is the tolerance from the liberals that they are so famed for? I'm guessing it doesn't count when it comes to Tories!



Or clever...
Begone, Tory.