Jericholyte2
Full Member
- Joined
- Oct 6, 2004
- Messages
- 4,001
It's the Rashford argument - you can't take £350k per week and not apply yourself to the highest standards on the pitch when other people in the organisation are losing their jobs.
Same as Labour, they can't bleat on about having no money in the treasury and cutting pensioner's compensation that has been judged fairly to be owed to them, while spending frivolously elsewhere. Labour may not have been in power for 14 years, but in opposition they set themselves up to be the party of "integrity".
Turns out by "integrity" they meant to stab you in the front, rather than the Tory option of simply lying and doing the same thing.
Which isn't actually a surprise to anyone who has listened to Starmer, but when the outcome is the same it's just as shameless at the end of the day.
Starmer was championing the WASPI cause, personally, in 2022. Hardly 'this week's media cause'Of course they shouldn't be spending money frivolously but Labour didn't decide or sign this contract. So why are you so upset with them about it?
You can't use it as an example of Labour's hypocrisy or frivolousness, or use it as a stick to beat them up for not spending £10billion on this week's media cause.
It's not this week's media cause is it. It's been Labour's cause for years and it's they who have decided that they won't honour it.Of course they shouldn't be spending money frivolously but Labour didn't decide or sign this contract. So why are you so upset with them about it?
You can't use it as an example of Labour's hypocrisy or frivolousness, or use it as a stick to beat them up for not spending £10billion on this week's media cause.
Remind me, were "WASPI" payments in the manifesto? Or is this just yet another invented controversy.It's not this week's media cause is it. It's been Labour's cause for years and it's they who have decided that they won't honour it.
And they can cancel contracts, just like they can cancel winter fuel payments. Not like their hands are tied.
Labour shouldn't have aligned themselves with this PR campaign but this wasn't a manifesto commitment.It's not this week's media cause is it. It's been Labour's cause for years and it's they who have decided that they won't honour it.
And they can cancel contracts, just like they can cancel winter fuel payments. Not like their hands are tied.
Indeed they can, and the government is about to launch a line by line spending review which presumably will cover this kind of thing. So judge them on that rather than on one off distractions.It's not this week's media cause is it. It's been Labour's cause for years and it's they who have decided that they won't honour it.
And they can cancel contracts, just like they can cancel winter fuel payments. Not like their hands are tied.
Is it honestly even worth engaging with people that conflate aid and foreign policy considerations (such as not letting Russia set up camp on the border of western Europe) with payments for entitled people that didn't check their retirement information for a decade. I suggest not.The amount is £50million, it's for humanitarian aid and it's not to the new Syrian government but to NGOs and the UN. Source
Is it honestly even worth engaging with people that conflate aid and foreign policy considerations (such as not letting Russia set up camp on the border of western Europe) with payments for entitled people that didn't check their retirement information for a decade. I suggest not.
I wish more European politicians were aware of this.The amount of times the Ukraine argument is used is pathetic. Do people even realise the security implications if we let Russia take Ukraine. It's a lazy argument.
Yeah, you wouldn't want to waste taxpayers money, would you?
Government department spends £1,200 on two folders
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c3vrw9pd16do
Exactly. We can afford it, it’s just that they’re choosing to carry out austerity.Every time the "we can't afford it" argument comes out I just get images of PPE in my head. Or the magic money tree that could also magically dis and re-appear based on whether it suited the tories or not.
I know Labour weren't in power at these points but they've been that weak and middle of the road as an opposition, and had that little objection to it, I see them as still culpable anyway.
Maybe freeze energy prices or tax excess profits on basic utilities, excess wealth, etc. like they actually should, and it wouldn't be such a big headache to find a bit more tax money to pay for some other cock up. Obviously this is naive thinking but I don't think there's much of a leeway left on how much MPs can get away with insulting everyone's intelligence.
The younger generations aren't sitting at home watching this shite on the TV though. They know their audience.I wish the media had the same energy every time the government fecked over the younger generations over the last few decades.
That is where we are.The Tories left traps everywhere for Labour, both deliberate and accidental. Labour shouldn't have identified themselves with the campaign but also, they did not know just how dire the state of the public finances were (and the Tories did).
There's this weird sense in the country where people just assume there is this infinite pot of money that can be repeatedly dipped into, while at the same time the evidence of a lack of cash is right before our eyes.
We can't afford to give £10billion - or even £4bn - to a group of people who did not take the trouble to inform themselves of a change in the pension age that they had 15 years to plan for. This is not, for example, like the immoral and criminal situation with the sub post masters.
The chancellor campaigned for Waspi women to receive compensation when she was shadow pensions minister - and revealed that her own mother was affected by changes to the pension age.
Rachel Reeves spoke in a Westminster Hall debate in 2016 in which she said the women hit by the increase to the state pension age from 60 to 65 in the 2010s had been "done an injustice".
The basic reason we are in this mess is because the economy is not growing and has not been growing. Taxes are going up because costs are increasing yet without the growth or the borrowing headroom to pay for it. It's not because we aren't taxing enough.Every time the "we can't afford it" argument comes out I just get images of PPE in my head. Or the magic money tree that could also magically dis and re-appear based on whether it suited the tories or not.
I know Labour weren't in power at these points but they've been that weak and middle of the road as an opposition, and had that little objection to it, I see them as still culpable anyway.
Maybe freeze energy prices or tax excess profits on basic utilities, excess wealth, etc. like they actually should, as the LABOUR party, and it wouldn't be such a big headache to find a bit more tax money to pay for some other cock up. Obviously this is naive thinking but I don't think there's much of a leeway left on how much MPs can get away with insulting everyone's intelligence.
And Brexit is a massive milestone that won't get reversed any decade soon.The basic reason we are in this mess is because the economy is not growing and has not been growing. Taxes are going up because costs are increasing yet without the growth or the borrowing headroom to pay for it. It's not because we aren't taxing enough.
We have to start growing again, but labour are in a dangerous position where they need to tax more, because growth is low, but when they tax more they slow growth even more. And they can't borrow more because that means interest rates rise, slowing growth even more. I'm not sure how they will break out of this.
It really is.And Brexit is a massive milestone that won't get reversed any decade soon.
You know what? Good on her for deciding the country couldn't actually afford it, despite her personal wishes and presumably personal embarrassment. That is her doing her job.
I think there is a difference between changing your mind and lying. I think think Reeves was probably sincere before she saw the books. But that's me giving them the benefit of the doubt, which I know you aren't going to do.
I think politicians lying is a bad thing.
I can’t see the Labour Party willing to spend money on actually helping people.The money could go on this: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cly21w7qewvo
Exactly. Reeves and Starmer are cowardly turncoats.
I think politicians lying is a bad thing.
Yikes.It’s the correct decision. A bunch of entitled women demanding a handout.
The argument about hypocrisy, fine, but it wasnt on Labour's manifesto, despite any previous views.
Storm in a teacup.
Changing your mind is not the same as lying, and I'm sure you on some level must realise that?
I think politicians lying is a bad thing.
True, she has changed her mind. But at the same time, the fact that she and the prime minister have flip flopped on their promises and previous principles is a sign of cowardice.Changing your mind is not the same as lying, and I'm sure you on some level must realise that?
Because people aren't serious anymore. It's all a bit of a laugh really isn't it, let's pile on. All things are possible and if they aren't happening, it's because someone is evil. The only person who ever could have saved us was Corbyn, who was perfect, and you didn't choose him so we all deserve what we get from the liars who replace him, who are all the same. I don't need to explain what the right are doing.why are pre Covid promises being resurrected as a Gotcha moment. The landscape has changed materially. You’re merely doing the gutter right wing press’ job for them
This but unironically. Corbyn would have been a great prime minister, this Labour government is full of cnuts, and no, criticising them does not make you equivalent to a columnist for the Daily Mail.Because people aren't serious anymore. It's all a bit of a laugh really isn't it, let's pile on. All things are possible and if they aren't happening, it's because someone is evil. The only person who ever could have saved us was Corbyn, who was perfect, and you didn't choose him so we all deserve what we get from the liars who replace him, who are all the same.
Something like that I think. It's deeply, corrosively cynical.
Yup. I knew he’d be like this. It’s the same with how Biden was and how his failures allowed a fascist to win this year.Basically Starmer is everything we said he'll be but it's our fault for pointing it out too early.
Zis Ewe?Because people aren't serious anymore. It's all a bit of a laugh really isn't it, let's pile on. All things are possible and if they aren't happening, it's because someone is evil. The only person who ever could have saved us was Corbyn, who was perfect, and you didn't choose him so we all deserve what we get from the liars who replace him, who are all the same. I don't need to explain what the right are doing.
Something like that I think. It's deeply, corrosively cynical.
Genuine concern? It's a football forum. I come on here to shoot some shit, have an argument.
But I get that some people come here mainly to show off how much they care about things to a bunch of strangers.
Because people aren't serious anymore. It's all a bit of a laugh really isn't it, let's pile on. All things are possible and if they aren't happening, it's because someone is evil. The only person who ever could have saved us was Corbyn, who was perfect, and you didn't choose him so we all deserve what we get from the liars who replace him, who are all the same. I don't need to explain what the right are doing.
Something like that I think. It's deeply, corrosively cynical.