Wesley Sneijder

Status
Not open for further replies.
Pexbo said:
Well considering the board is made up of the Glazers, Gill, Bolingbroke and Woodward, it does make sense.

I assume Gill has offered a package which was within our budget, which was then negotiated by Sneijder's representatives, now he has to go to the rest of the board in order to work out if they feel it is within the clubs interest to adjust that budget.

I'm guessing it isn't as simple as the sliding bar in Football Manager.
Click to expand...

I've never played FM, I am fairly certain the Glazers can overide all decisions.
 
RDCR07 said:
We have already splashed left and right. We only need center.
Click to expand...

RDCR07 said:
Whats Coldstream?
Click to expand...

Clearly not. I allude to the Coldstream Guards, whose regimental quick march is the tune from Mozart's aria (from the Marriage of Figaro) 'Non piu andrai farfallone amoroso', to which they march to the words 'by the left, by the right, by the centre'.
 
Crustanoid said:
Is this the most mind-numbingly crap transfer saga of all time?

I think so
Click to expand...

When you have pics of Sneijder's WAG in the mix, it can't be that mind-numbing really - and then you throw in Cleverley's into the mix of conversations and you've got got a bloody exciting transfer on your hands. Not to mention the occaisonal "tits out" by MUFCGal.
 
Should we read something into the fact that the Inter squad was training today and Sneijder is on a holiday in Ibiza? Strange, but maybe they just figured he needs a rest from all the crap that is going on.

This whole thing is already annoying, hopefully Sir Alex tells us something tomorrow (not likely though). Roll on Sunday, thankfully there is a game this weekend.
 
I bet SAF says that we are not interested in Sneijder during the press conference tomorrow.
 
I wonder what SAF will say tomorrow in his press conference about Sneijder?

1) We have no interest in Sneijder
2) I am fed up of talking about him so not answering any questions on that topic
3) We made a bid but unlikely to be accepted
4) Its down to the player now, we've done everything possible
5) Cuntis i thought i fckn banned you from Carrington

Pick one of the above..
 
Nate Dogg said:
I wonder what SAF will say tomorrow in his press conference about Sneijder?

1) We have no interest in Sneijder
2) I am fed up of talking about him so not answering any questions on that topic
3) We made a bid but unlikely to be accepted
4) Its down to the player now, we've done everything possible
5) Cuntis i thought i fckn banned you from Carrington

Pick one of the above..
Click to expand...

theres a press conference about Sneijder?:nervous:
 
Nate Dogg said:
I wonder what SAF will say tomorrow in his press conference about Sneijder?

1) We have no interest in Sneijder
2) I am fed up of talking about him so not answering any questions on that topic
3) We made a bid but unlikely to be accepted
4) Its down to the player now, we've done everything possible
5) Cuntis i thought i fckn banned you from Carrington

Pick one of the above..
Click to expand...

6- shut up wr8_utd!
 
He'll open the presser with some kind of "I'm only here to talk about the match on Sunday" comment. Either that or the press officer who brings him in will say it before he sits down.
 
Nate Dogg said:
I wonder what SAF will say tomorrow in his press conference about Sneijder?

1) We have no interest in Sneijder
2) I am fed up of talking about him so not answering any questions on that topic
3) We made a bid but unlikely to be accepted
4) Its down to the player now, we've done everything possible
5) Cuntis i thought i fckn banned you from Carrington

Pick one of the above..
Click to expand...

"Ahh I'm nae getting intae tha, you press will print what you like anyway. there's no dote about tha"
 
Boss said:
Why are people so greedy?!

Why?!! Somebody tell me, what does the man need with such money :(
Click to expand...

charlenefan said:
Seriously has no one posted this yet?

garbosj Ian McGarry
Sneijder salary package so complex/expensive will need to be approved by #MUFC board. Still long way off agreement.
Click to expand...

Not worth it.

Why does one person need so much? The answer is they don't. Greedy feckers have us in the state of global financial turmoil we see around us. This should not be encouraged.

feck him off before he gets here.

Useless bagman.
 
Ace said:
The thread that is. Moving at lightspeed.
Click to expand...

Comparison to the newbies it's a snail, they broke the 16,000 mark yesterday, in a few hours they'll break the 17,000.
 
Players are going to ask for what the market will take. Time for some of the clubs to say enough is enough, the game simply can't afford the silly money being thrown around now.
 
Nate Dogg said:
I wonder what SAF will say tomorrow in his press conference about Sneijder?

1) We have no interest in Sneijder
2) I am fed up of talking about him so not answering any questions on that topic
3) We made a bid but unlikely to be accepted
4) Its down to the player now, we've done everything possible
5) Cuntis i thought i fckn banned you from Carrington

Pick one of the above..
Click to expand...

E) Boue
 
ThatOldRedMagic said:
Clearly not. I allude to the Coldstream Guards, whose regimental quick march is the tune from Mozart's aria (from the Marriage of Figaro) 'Non piu andrai farfallone amoroso', to which they march to the words 'by the left, by the right, by the centre'.
Click to expand...

I really don't see where you are going with this.
 
United pull plug on Sneijder deal after Dutch ace prices himself out of a move
Manchester United have given up on their bid to sign Wesley Sneijder from Inter Milan.

United manager Sir Alex Ferguson had been hoping to make the Dutch international his final signing of the summer.
But senior Old Trafford sources told Sportsmail that United have now grown tired of a saga that has dragged on since the end of last season and have decided to pull the plug on the deal.

With 27-year-old Sneijder sitting right at the wrong end of United's age limit for new signings, Ferguson and chief executive David Gill have decided to walk away from a player who was demanding in excess of £200,000-a-week in wages.

United's decision to back off explains the fact that Sneijder's representatives have this week been hawking him around United's Barclays Premier League rivals Chelsea and Manchester City. Neither club have an expressed an interest, with City sources describing the overall cost of the deal as 'mind blowing'.

With Sneijder desperate to leave Inter, it now seems very possible that the World Cup finalist will find himself stuck at the San Siro when the transfer window closes at the end of the month.
The only way that United's interest will be rekindled is if Sneijder dramatically drops his financial demands later in the window.

However, United do not expect this to happen and Old Trafford sources last night stressed that the club will do 'absolutely nothing' to resurrect what would have been the big Premier League transfer of the summer.

It is clear that Inter and Sneijder would have to make the first move.
Click to expand...
Something from a paper.
 
That's the story bob cass was supposed to write a couple of weeks ago when he fecked it up quoting saf rather than "sources".
 
Manchester United say Wesley Sneijder will not join the club

• Inter midfielder's move to Old Trafford now unlikely
• Confusion remains about on-off transfer saga

Sport
Football
Manchester United

Manchester United say Wesley Sneijder will not join the club

• Inter midfielder's move to Old Trafford now unlikely
• Confusion remains about on-off transfer saga

reddit this

Daniel Taylor
guardian.co.uk, Thursday 11 August 2011 23.02 BST
Article history

Inter Milan's Dutch midfielder Wesley Sneijder
The Internazionale midfielder, Wesley Sneijder, is now unlikely to sign for Manchester United. Photograph: Christof Stache/AFP/Getty Images

Manchester United have said they do not expect Wesley Sneijder to join the club from Internazionale before the end of the transfer window. Although the Premier League champions did not want to go on the record, the official stance from Old Trafford is that the deal is not going to happen. The information comes from boardroom level, with the chief executive, David Gill, giving his approval for it to be known that United are not actively trying to sign the Dutchman.

That position can feasibly change – Sneijder could, in theory, drastically lower his salary requirements and Inter may offer him at a reduced fee – but this is to be regarded as unlikely, according to United. If that remains the case, it threatens to be a significant setback to Sir Alex Ferguson's hopes of building a team with realistic aspirations of closing the gap on Barcelona over the next few years.

Ferguson has spent £50m this summer on Ashley Young, Phil Jones and David de Gea but regarded the signing of a top-quality central midfielder as a priority. The manager has missed out on Samir Nasri of Arsenal while another target, Tottenham Hotspur's Luka Modric, favours a move to Chelsea. Nasri's talks with Manchester City are at an advanced stage although time may be running out for their hope that the transfer can be finalised in time for him to make his debut at home to Swansea City on Monday.

Sneijder has said there have been "unofficial talks" with United and there remains an element of confusion about the exact order of events leading to Thursday's development. United first notified journalists at the start of the team's pre-season tour to the United States that Sneijder did not feature in their plans. They are now reiterating that this is the case.

Yet in between Gill admitted there had been contact with Inter. He qualified that by saying "we didn't progress that one", but stressed the situation could change before the end of the window. "The important point is that you never know. I've been around in football long enough to know things change quickly."

Sneijder has been told he can leave San Siro – Inter offered him to Manchester City a few weeks ago – and Ferguson privately admitted during the US tour that the club were heavily embroiled in the process of trying to negotiate a deal and that a contract offer had been made. Yet Gill has told colleagues something entirely different, saying it was ruled out some time ago. The two accounts do not match and, as yet, there is no clear explanation.

The latest briefing from Old Trafford is, however, emphatic and, at boardroom level, United rarely offer guidance on transfers unless their position is clear. No reason has been offered, but it could simply be that the cost of Sneijder is beyond United's financial means – at least, as things stand.

The Holland midfielder likes the idea of moving to Old Trafford but it would mean a huge investment on United's part, possibly breaking the club-record £30.75m they paid Tottenham for Dimitar Berbatov in 2008. Sneijder would command a salary of around £12m a year and, perhaps crucially, he fits outside the club policy of not spending huge transfer fees on players who are aged 26 and above.

The club made an exception for Berbatov, who was 27 when he signed, but Gill described that at the time as "the last of its kind". Sneijder was 27 in June, meaning his resale value would sharply depreciate towards the end of a four- or five-year contract.

That still leaves several unanswered questions, such as why United would have explored the possibilities of signing him in the first place if they had no intention of breaking this policy. Ferguson supported the introduction of the age restrictions but, in this case, he has clearly been willing to make an exception at a time when Barcelona are bringing in Cesc Fábregas and Manchester City are close to establishing themselves, once again, as the biggest transfer-window spenders in English football.

United were the first club to bid for Nasri this summer but Arsenal made it clear they would not entertain the idea of doing business with the champions. Arsenal's position has been different with City and a deal in the region of £23m is close to being finalised. The player has agreed personal terms, with reports in France stating it will be a five-year contract with a weekly salary of £160,000.
Click to expand...
From another paper
 
Here is another one.

Manchester United are no longer interested in signing Wesley Sneijder | Football | The Guardian
Manchester United have said they do not expect Wesley Sneijder to join the club from Internazionale before the end of the transfer window. Although the Premier League champions did not want to go on the record, the official stance from Old Trafford is that the deal is not going to happen. The information comes from boardroom level, with the chief executive, David Gill, giving his approval for it to be known that United are not actively trying to sign the Dutchman.

That position can feasibly change – Sneijder could, in theory, drastically lower his salary requirements and Inter may offer him at a reduced fee – but this is to be regarded as unlikely, according to United. If that remains the case, it threatens to be a significant setback to Sir Alex Ferguson's hopes of building a team with realistic aspirations of closing the gap on Barcelona over the next few years.

Ferguson has spent £50m this summer on Ashley Young, Phil Jones and David de Gea but regarded the signing of a top-quality central midfielder as a priority. The manager has missed out on Samir Nasri of Arsenal while another target, Tottenham Hotspur's Luka Modric, favours a move to Chelsea. Nasri's talks with Manchester City are at an advanced stage although time may be running out for their hope that the transfer can be finalised in time for him to make his debut at home to Swansea City on Monday.

Sneijder has said there have been "unofficial talks" with United and there remains an element of confusion about the exact order of events leading to Thursday's development. United first notified journalists at the start of the team's pre-season tour to the United States that Sneijder did not feature in their plans. They are now reiterating that this is the case.

Yet in between Gill admitted there had been contact with Inter. He qualified that by saying "we didn't progress that one", but stressed the situation could change before the end of the window. "The important point is that you never know. I've been around in football long enough to know things change quickly."

Sneijder has been told he can leave San Siro – Inter offered him to Manchester City a few weeks ago – and Ferguson privately admitted during the US tour that the club were heavily embroiled in the process of trying to negotiate a deal and that a contract offer had been made. Yet Gill has told colleagues something entirely different, saying it was ruled out some time ago. The two accounts do not match and, as yet, there is no clear explanation.

The latest briefing from Old Trafford is, however, emphatic and, at boardroom level, United rarely offer guidance on transfers unless their position is clear. No reason has been offered, but it could simply be that the cost of Sneijder is beyond United's financial means – at least, as things stand.

The Holland midfielder likes the idea of moving to Old Trafford but it would mean a huge investment on United's part, possibly breaking the club-record £30.75m they paid Tottenham for Dimitar Berbatov in 2008. Sneijder would command a salary of around £12m a year and, perhaps crucially, he fits outside the club policy of not spending huge transfer fees on players who are aged 26 and above.

The club made an exception for Berbatov, who was 27 when he signed, but Gill described that at the time as "the last of its kind". Sneijder was 27 in June, meaning his resale value would sharply depreciate towards the end of a four- or five-year contract.

That still leaves several unanswered questions, such as why United would have explored the possibilities of signing him in the first place if they had no intention of breaking this policy. Ferguson supported the introduction of the age restrictions but, in this case, he has clearly been willing to make an exception at a time when Barcelona are bringing in Cesc Fábregas and Manchester City are close to establishing themselves, once again, as the biggest transfer-window spenders in English football.

United were the first club to bid for Nasri this summer but Arsenal made it clear they would not entertain the idea of doing business with the champions. Arsenal's position has been different with City and a deal in the region of £23m is close to being finalised. The player has agreed personal terms, with reports in France stating it will be a five-year contract with a weekly salary of £160,000.
Click to expand...
 
DTguardian daniel taylor
#MUFC say they don't expect to sign Wesley Sneijder. Leaves a lot of unanswered questions, but club are emphatic bit.ly/rrf8Ec

I just don't care anymore.


EDIT - beaten to it EDIT - twice.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.