He and Charlie Adam would be great buys. That said, I think it will be a midfielder and a keeper.
I'd rather want us to give Cleverley a chance.
I'd rather want us to give Cleverley a chance.
I'd rather want us to give Cleverley a chance.
Manchester United are set to make a sensational summer swoop for Inter Milan star Wesley Sneijder.
According to the Sunday Mirror, the Holland international is said to be seriously considering a move to the Barclays Premier League, with Sir Alex Ferguson viewing him as a long-term replacement for Paul Scholes.
The United veteran has been offered a one-year contract extension, but Scholes, who turns 37 later this year could follow team-mate Gary Neville into retirement at the end of the season.
Sneijder has struggled with form and illness this campaign, but Inter still value him at £40million, and the team's president Massimo Moratti admits the Old Trafford club are very keen on the star midfielder.
'The interest from Manchester United on Sneijder is real, but I didn't look into it. My only interest is seeing Sneijder play here for many years to come.'
Yes please.
Top, top player but not as good as some make out. Besides, where would he fit in? He'd be the ideal man in Europe but I could see us having problems in the league. Playing him in a 4-4-2 would be absolute suicide as he's not used to the pace in England, nor does he have great stamina. This story doesn't really excite me to be honest.
I've never noticed a stamina issue, the pace is a non-issue really, no player who comes here is used to the pace in England, ever. So we shouldn't stop buying players because they've never played here before.
He is a player in Scholes mould so if Scholes can play here then he can, he can also take belting free kicks, not afraid to shoot, his passing range is great and he picks out sublime through balls on a regular basis. It's everything we need.
I used to watch him fairly regularly at Real Madrid, and i'm pretty certain he was taken off in almost every match - he couldnt last 90 minutes. Whether this isnt an issue in Italy due to the pace, I dont know, I dont follow Italian football enough. With this in mind though, its obvious he would take some time to settle into the English league.
Why the feck did we not get him thrown in on top of 80 million for Ronaldo. They would have done it.
Why the feck did we not get him thrown in on top of 80 million for Ronaldo. They would have done it.
As would any player who comes from abroad.
I didn't realise he was 26 years old. Thought he was around 30 for some reason.
Why the feck did we not get him thrown in on top of 80 million for Ronaldo. They would have done it.
I seriously doubt they'd have chucked in a £20m asset on top of a World Record transfer fee.
VDV, we don't have a place for him in the side in a 442. As for Robben, we had Valencia in mind.And Van Der Vaart and Robben as well.
Could have turned out well.
VDV, we don't have a place for him in the side in a 442. As for Robben, we had Valencia in mind.
We weren't playing 4-4-2 at the time we sold Ronaldo - only afterwards as far as I can remember, hence why Rooney was pushed out left for half of Ronaldo's last season.
We missed the boat with Robben and Sneijder - the stand our performers in last years Champions League.
Still, easy to say after the event I suppose.
We weren't playing 4-4-2 at the time we sold Ronaldo - only afterwards as far as I can remember, hence why Rooney was pushed out left for half of Ronaldo's last season.
We missed the boat with Robben and Sneijder - the stand our performers in last years Champions League.
Still, easy to say after the event I suppose.
A lot of people were saying it at the time too.
............Rooney
Robben...Sneijder....Valencia
..........Carrick..Scholes
That would have looked damned tasty (and I would say performed brilliantly)
Almost everyone on here who is bitching about not getting those two players then, was calling them Madrid rejects the summer the two left.
What about Nani?
I seriously doubt they'd have chucked in a £20m asset on top of a World Record transfer fee.
I would have taken 50m and Robben and Sneijder. In that case we already have two world class players who are young and our midfield would have set for the next 6-7 years with Robben, Senijder, Scholes, Carrick, Fletcher, Ando, Nani, Giggs and Park. I doubt we would have bought Valencia if we had got Robben.
Half? Only some of the big games it's like that. I suppose you thought that Park/Giggs/Nani were playing alongside two other in the middle then? We played with two strikers upfront more often. Rooney further forward, and Berba/Tevez behind him.. in the big games, we play with only one striker upfront, and only sometimes Ronaldo played through the middle.We weren't playing 4-4-2 at the time we sold Ronaldo - only afterwards as far as I can remember, hence why Rooney was pushed out left for half of Ronaldo's last season.
We missed the boat with Robben and Sneijder - the stand our performers in last years Champions League.
Still, easy to say after the event I suppose.
It's only 5 months since he signed a new 5yr contract with Inter.
Other than that it looks like last summers waffle re-hashed.
I just find it hard to believe that Fergie only spots players like Sneijder once they've done well for what is their 3rd major club - surely if he liked Sneijder as a player we'd have went for him when he was at Ajax or more likely when we sold Ronaldo to Real Madrid and made him part of the deal.
It's for that reason why I find it highly unlikely that he's a player we'll be in for, likewise Ashley Young - why all of a sudden would we be after him especially when Nani is now in the form of his life and Valencia is back fit again and showing no signs of the injury hampering his form.
I just find it hard to believe that Fergie only spots players like Sneijder once they've done well for what is their 3rd major club - surely if he liked Sneijder as a player we'd have went for him when he was at Ajax or more likely when we sold Ronaldo to Real Madrid and made him part of the deal.