What's bemusing is the cognitive dissonance between a player having a bad game and the manager having the power to either correct that in-game, with tactical amendments, or hook him, yet proceeding to do neither whilst the player continues to get the blame. It takes all kinds of mental gymnastics to run through a whole team doing that for each individual who's having a bad game and looking completely out of sorts.
The goals we score don't come through a system or coaching method: they are momentary flashes of individual or even collective combination brilliance before, weirdly, the play becomes disconnected again unless the opposing to team then has no choice but to open up and leave massive gaps for us to play into, which is any professional players' dream and something they've been adept at since a single digit age.
We put more men at the back, supposedly to shore up space and to keep things compact, whilst, ironically giving even more space to the opposition and acres of space for them to play into; we have five at the back, yet are vulnerable to diagonals out wide. What?; We make pressing multiple times easier for the opposition because we're sat so deep, with so few creative players, that our whole team has to drop back and the ones trying to play out whilst being pressed are the most press-susceptible in the whole team leading to even more easy turnovers and a completely disorientated backline behind them.
Once they went 2 up, the dynamics of the game, from their POV, changed, and panic set in, for them, with not knowing whether to stick or twist, which invited us back into the game and could have had us get the required result.
None of this points towards coaching awareness, and if sitting back and breaking on the counter doesn't work, we don't know what to do as a collective - there is no default fallback system or method that the players can feel comfortable with before any changes need to be made, which is why we're so up and down and so obviously, and continually vulnerable throughout 90 minutes, let alone over a run of games.
I don't care what name is at the helm - but as a club who supposedly demand the best, it should always be someone who is, or has, the potential to be one of the best in the world. The same goes for the coaching staff and the trickle down effect. We should not be having these same issues season after season; it is well within our financial means to fix.