The Mitcher
connoisseur of pot noodles and sandwiches
It had to be Gerrard that had undone his hard work to get that goal. Sadly the media will spin it so Rooney still gets the blame.
The likes of RvP and Suarez would've grabbed a few more goals if they'd been playing for England today.
That said, he did well tonight considering how poor ye were generally. Doesn't deserve the criticism he'll likely get.
May be. May be not. Formations do not really matter. Roles and tactics matter much more. Take Real Madrid, they play Ronaldo on the left. But does he go deep to cover for LB? No, he can't. Rather that is not effective use of his skills. So what does Anci do? He does not want Ronaldo in the middle, cause you need a player that is better playing with his back to the goal, to hold up ball, fight for it in the air, be a focal point of attack, hold up ball, etc. That's Benzema. So Anci puts Di Maria closer to the left as a AM and he covers more of a left side, there is also Alonso who positioned a bit closer to the LB to cover and keep this area solid defensively. Then on the other side he's got Bale, who used to be a defender, not anymore, but he can cover the whole side. He can track back, deep, so there is no need to some extra cover on that side.Isnt that more of a 433 as opposed to the 4231 England played?
In no way is a forward unlucky if they miss an open net from 2 yards.a great performance from wayne, unlucky with that header as well.
and surely it has to be gerrard assisting suarez,
In no way is a forward unlucky if they miss an open net from 2 yards.
He didn't even head the ball straight. It had neither the height or direction required to go in. Poor miss.Ya, right. An open net when the ball was rising at crossbar level. At that stage it is all about inch perfect contact. It is far difficult than just "missing open net from 2 yards."
No they wouldn't have. Except few flashes, England team was very disjointed. I seriously don't understand what is England team's problem. Even supposedly mediocre teams are better organized and do basics right.
People again thinking that stats are all, just because he scored doesn't mean he wasn't the reason we lost.
Game one, we had a great start with the Liverpool core 4 players all linking well. After 25 minutes of solid play Rooney got grumpy that he wasn't involved even though the TEAM was doing well and was thus moved around. This broke the fluidity of the attack and left us just as exposed on the wings, all that was achieved with with swap was him pushing Sterling out wide and Sturridge was less involved as Rooney couldn't find him and then pushed on to be a striker.
Game two, Sterling started out wide as Rooney is "undroppable" and had to be played so he was selected as a #10 as he didn't perform on the wing. As a #10 he failed to link the attack and literally sat in the middle of the pitch leaving the back 2 of Gerrard and Henderson struggling to find an outfield ball, he never really "floated" like the best #10's do and as a result the only time they found Rooney he lost it as he was swamped due being heavily marked due to lack of movement. Sure he scored the tap in, but was that worth ruining the entire teams flow for the whole game?
Sure, I can't place all the blame on him, Hodgson was beyond stupid to have Barkley on the right, and Two #10's on the pitch with 4 Strikers (wayne, danny,danny,ricky). Hodgson just bashes any player on the pitch in any position and hopes it works.
I Wonder when England will realise that the system is equally as important as the players in it. I mean Millner should have played in this world cup, to be constantly played in the Oil Club shows you must be doing something right.
I think they might have. Even a half fit Suarez buried his chances when they came. Rooney isn't on his or RvP's level as an out and out striker. The header he missed and the chance the keeper saved were tough chance but the very best put them away. Bit harsh judging Rooney on that high a standard but that's the level he's striving for. That said, he was still one of their better players today.
Agree with the rest of your post though. I used to think expectations in England were unrealistically high but the truth is they should be better than this. Easy to blame the manager but it goes beyond that I think.
Far, far greater threat when deployed centrally than on the wing, even if he struggled to link the midfield and attack. Arevalo did a good job on him in the first half, but he was very good second half, not only in his goal threat, but his overall play.
People again thinking that stats are all, just because he scored doesn't mean he wasn't the reason we lost.
Game one, we had a great start with the Liverpool core 4 players all linking well. After 25 minutes of solid play Rooney got grumpy that he wasn't involved even though the TEAM was doing well and was thus moved around. This broke the fluidity of the attack and left us just as exposed on the wings, all that was achieved with with swap was him pushing Sterling out wide and Sturridge was less involved as Rooney couldn't find him and then pushed on to be a striker.
Game two, Sterling started out wide as Rooney is "undroppable" and had to be played so he was selected as a #10 as he didn't perform on the wing. As a #10 he failed to link the attack and literally sat in the middle of the pitch leaving the back 2 of Gerrard and Henderson struggling to find an outfield ball, he never really "floated" like the best #10's do and as a result the only time they found Rooney he lost it as he was swamped due being heavily marked due to lack of movement. Sure he scored the tap in, but was that worth ruining the entire teams flow for the whole game?
Sure, I can't place all the blame on him, Hodgson was beyond stupid to have Barkley on the right, and Two #10's on the pitch with 4 Strikers (wayne, danny,danny,ricky). Hodgson just bashes any player on the pitch in any position and hopes it works.
I Wonder when England will realise that the system is equally as important as the players in it. I mean Millner should have played in this world cup, to be constantly played in the Oil Club shows you must be doing something right.
Best player on the pitch today for England. Great in the second half with his all-around play. Happy for him that he got his goal.
This isn't a Cavani threadMissed a sitter. Can't get away from that. Fair play though for breaking his World Cup finals hoodoo.
His fans are happy he broke his WC jinx. I get that and good for him. Now comes the hyperbole "best English player on the pitch". "Great performance". Someone even said he was " the best player on the pitch". A commentator on ESPN, when Rooney did not score the cut back from Baines, said "19 out of 20 times he would have scored that for UTD".
Do you not see how these statements make non-Rooney big-time fans feeling like rolling their eyes?
Rooney made a good through pass for sturridge in the 1st half. A very good free kick attempt and scored a tap in.
He mis-controlled a couple balls, got a couple of balls taken away from him, messed up a glorious opportunity and missed a difficult but scoreable header.
He was out of the game for most of the 1st half.
Suarez was constantly involved. As much as I dislike him he created a few opportunities for himself and proved himself to be a world class finisher.
When his country needed him, he showed up and won them the game. Despite not being "match fit" or a "100%".
That is the mark of a World Class player. A great player.
If Rooney despite not playing great had scored that cutback and the header along with his tap-in, I would have stood up and applauded.
I would then be on this forum admitting his greatness.
Instead I am going to have to read all of this deluded praise for what was just a reasonable performance capped off by a tap in goal.
Of course the said commentator referred to Rooney's excellent awareness and positioning.
Hmmm. You are basically agreeing that he did not have a great performance and was not the best player on the pitch.Rooney had a good game. Definitely one of the best players on the pitch. Was man marked throughout, which made life difficult but overcame that eventually. Would have a good case for MOTM if Suarez hadn't got that second goal. The latter deserves credit for taking his goals brilliantly but was nowhere near as involved overall.
Basically, you're talking bollox. A consistent theme in your contributions to this thread.
EDIT: although, to be fair, you're one of many.
No he isn't, don't be so dense. If you're chatting rubbish then stop chatting rubbish.Hmmm. You are basically agreeing that he did not have a great performance and was not the best player on the pitch.
Anyway I have grown accustomed to posters disagreeing me saying I am chatting rubbish. I do not get involved with that aspect of debate.
I think my points were solid but the bigtime Rooney fans will never agree. C'est la vie. There are others who probably share my opinion.
Hmmm. You are basically agreeing that he did not have a great performance and was not the best player on the pitch.
Anyway I have grown accustomed to posters disagreeing me saying I am chatting rubbish. I do not get involved with that aspect of debate.
I think my points were solid but the bigtime Rooney fans will never agree. C'est la vie. There are others who probably share my opinion.
No he isn't, don't be so dense. If you're chatting rubbish then stop chatting rubbish.
ok you have qualified that point of your argument but no mention of the "good game" Vs great performance.Players who score a couple of goals often get MOTM even if their overall performance isn't the best on the pitch. Tonight being a good example.
There is something to be said for loyalty, no matter how blind.He was the best player on the pitch, Suarez may have scored two goals but didnt contribute as much to game play as Rooney did.
There is something to be said for loyalty, no matter how blind.
Hopefully LVG's vision is less clouded.