psychdelicblues
Full Member
In the end, Fergie's strategy with Rooney should have come down to this: Will United be better with a motivated, strong Wayne Rooney or better off without him (and presumably with a replacement)?
Fergie clearly decided a while back that he would not use all of his 'legendary man-management' experience on Rooney. It's easy and popular to say 'he's on 200k a week he should wear United pajamas and clean the youth teams' boots for that' but that ignores the reality that all footballers are different people, and it takes very different approaches to get the best out of different people.
Think of your job, whatever you do. There are those employees that require the soft approach, with lots of encouragment and positive reinforcement. There are others who only work at their best when they feel pressured. Great management is about applying different methods to the right people.
So, this Wayne Rooney is a hell of a footballer, but he's also bizarrely delicate, emotional and needs certain treatment to be at his best. That's hardly news to anyone, least of all Ferguson.
So for me, either Fergie looked at Rooney around Christmas and genuinely believed United would be better off without him, or Fergie just let his vendetta side show, and decided f*ck Wayne Rooney and f*ck his scummy agent.
As much as gut instinct is to side with Fergie, it's simplistic and might end up hurting the club in the long term.
Personally I believe that we're better with a strong Wayne Rooney than we'd be with any available replacement. And if that meant Ferguson having to suck it up a bit and be overly nice to Rooney, I think he should have done it.
Or maybe Fergie did 'suck it up' but his patience ran thin.