LR7
Full Member
- Joined
- Jun 6, 2012
- Messages
- 8,885
If someone says he gives the ball away on so many occasions then it's entirely relevant to point to the fact that, actually, he didn't give it away that much. It doesn't tell you how they performed but it tells you how well they kept the ball. Rooney kept the ball well, he wasn't consistently surrendering possession like some people are suggesting, it's just that he had a couple of terrible balls (just as he did v Stoke) and for some reason they've been used to define his performance. Just compare him to van Persie. He completed more passes (at a higher rate), he was dispossessed less and he gave the ball away less, yet somehow Rooney's performance was up there with Nani v Chelsea. And we're supposed to believe that there's no agenda against Rooney here. Rooney didn't use the ball well but he didn't give it away much either.
Van Persie set up Kagawa's assist and gets praised for it, Rooney plays Evra into the exact same area with a great little ball but he messes up the cutback and it's instantly forgotten...people remember the highlights and the build-up to the goals but they don't remember the great pieces of play that don't end up with a goal. I'd say that's much more likely to give you a misleading perspective on things than having a look at a few numbers. There's that link up between Rooney, van Persie and Jones already mentioned that nearly led to a goal, then there was Rooney's shot from a nicely worked corner with van Persie that nearly creeped in...he wasn't bad. This game and the Stoke game were easily two of the worst van Persie's had for us yet no-one mentions it because of those highlight moments. Strange.
Summed up perfectly.