rimaldo
All about the essence
- Joined
- Jan 10, 2008
- Messages
- 44,182
- Supports
- arse
all i know is van dijk’s wife keeps begging varane to come over via text so she can feel a real centre back inside her.
Has any player come back to their very best form after a ACL injury?
I think Vidic 2011 was better and that's the EPL aloneIt is clear that in his career he does not even compare to the other great defenders (even because he's only been at Liverpool for 5 seasons and got injured in one of them). My point from the beginning was that he had the best year for a centre-back in this century. And so far no one has proven otherwise. Everyone talked about the longevity of defenders but absolutely no one came to tell me "that centre-back had a better year than VvD in 2019 in this century". So the point remains.
I think Klopp lifts players the most.Can’t the managerial impact argument be made for most players? If John Terry had played for Chelsea without all the investment and managerial influence that followed Abramovic’s arrival, would he be considered as one of the best CB’s of the premier league era?
Would Ferdinand and Vidic be regarded so highly if they’d not spent their best years playing under Ferguson?
City could field the same players with a different manager and be a worse side without Pep.
I agree that Van Dijk’s peak is limited to a maximum of three full seasons at Liverpool (I’m including last season in that). There aren’t many that have helped transform a side like Van Dijk has though. Defensively he transformed Klopp’s Liverpool. I don’t think we could’ve won the Champions League in 2019 or the league in 2020 without him.
He loses on longevity but should get points for impact when compared to his peers.
No way man, even close. VvD in 2019 was second in the Balon d'Or by a very thin margin (less than 10 points) competing with Messi. He was Premier League's best player, UEFA's best player, UEFA's best defender, MOTM in the final of UCL (see vidic in final of 2011), FIFPro World XI, team of The tournament from nations League, UCL Team of the Tournament, PFA team of The tournament, pfa player of The season. Vidic was just Barclays player of The season and FIFA team of the year. It's embarrassing to make this comparison.I think Vidic 2011 was better and that's the EPL alone
No way man, even close. VvD in 2019 was second in the Balon d'Or by a very thin margin (less than 10 points) competing with Messi. He was Premier League's best player, UEFA's best player, UEFA's best defender, MOTM in the final of UCL (see vidic in final of 2011), FIFPro World XI, team of The tournament from nations League, UCL Team of the Tournament, PFA team of The tournament, pfa player of The season. Vidic was just Barclays player of The season and FIFA team of the year. It's embarrassing to make this comparison.
No way man, even close. VvD in 2019 was second in the Balon d'Or by a very thin margin (less than 10 points) competing with Messi. He was Premier League's best player, UEFA's best player, UEFA's best defender, MOTM in the final of UCL (see vidic in final of 2011), FIFPro World XI, team of The tournament from nations League, UCL Team of the Tournament, PFA team of The tournament, pfa player of The season. Vidic was just Barclays player of The season and FIFA team of the year. It's embarrassing to make this comparison.
Again, I never said that VvD is the best centre-back in history. I just said he had the best year for a centre-back in this century. You are using the scarecrow fallacy.Que Jorginho 2021 season greater than any season by any DM in the history of the game.
Like Jorginho is the best DM of all time given all the awards he won that season
Michael Owen there was no Messi or someone of the same level to compete. I'm comparing a centre-back's year with another centre-back. In this case, VvD 2019 with Vidic 2011. And VvD was clearly superior. Vidic was the best player in the Premier League and that was it. Thing that VvD too was. But he was also the best player in Europe, directly competing with Messi in one of his best years individually. Thing Vidic was not. Of course in career, Vidic is light years ahead of VvD. But specifically comparing VvD's 2019 year with Vidic's 2011, VvD was clearly superior and by a good marginMichael Owen won a Balon d'Or. The kinds of honours you mention mean nothing in these debates.
Again, I never said that VvD is the best centre-back in history. I just said he had the best year for a centre-back in this century. You are using the scarecrow fallacy.
Michael Owen there was no Messi or someone of the same level to compete. I'm comparing a centre-back's year with another centre-back. In this case, VvD 2019 with Vidic 2011. And VvD was clearly superior. Vidic was the best player in the Premier League and that was it. Thing that VvD too was. But he was also the best player in Europe, directly competing with Messi in one of his best years individually. Thing Vidic was not. Of course in career, Vidic is light years ahead of VvD. But specifically comparing VvD's 2019 year with Vidic's 2011, VvD was clearly superior and by a good margin
No way man, even close. VvD in 2019 was second in the Balon d'Or by a very thin margin (less than 10 points) competing with Messi. He was Premier League's best player, UEFA's best player, UEFA's best defender, MOTM in the final of UCL (see vidic in final of 2011), FIFPro World XI, team of The tournament from nations League, UCL Team of the Tournament, PFA team of The tournament, pfa player of The season. Vidic was just Barclays player of The season and FIFA team of the year. It's embarrassing to make this comparison.
Michael Owen won a Balon d'Or. The kinds of honours you mention mean nothing in these debates.
Sort of agree with you, but you can't dismiss Owen as some sort of chump. He was a real force of nature when he first emerged.
But VVD didn’t top Messi did he? You can’t write off Owen’s award because it suits you while claiming similar awards (or runners up awards) are de facto proof for VVD.
There is no evidence or “proving” anything when it comes to these debates, it’s a matter of opinion and yours is seemingly in the minority on here.
You're one of those who reckons Gerrard was much better than Scholes because he was in the team of the season way more aren't you.
Of course my opinion is in the minority here, this is a United forum. It's hard for a United fan (and I'm a United fan) to admit that their best defender's best season this century was far below the best season of the defender of his biggest rival.
I think Gerrard was better than Scholes but it's not the number of times he was in the team of the season (although that shows longevity). Gerrard is my 1st pick based on all-round capabilities and best form. Although maybe if Scholes had combined the best of his goalscoring form and best of his playmaking form at any particular time I might've changed that around
Of course my opinion is in the minority here, this is a United forum. It's hard for a United fan (and I'm a United fan) to admit that their best defender's best season this century was far below the best season of the defender of his biggest rival.
I think Gerrard was better than Scholes but it's not the number of times he was in the team of the season (although that shows longevity). Gerrard is my 1st pick based on all-round capabilities and best form. Although maybe if Scholes had combined the best of his goalscoring form and best of his playmaking form at any particular time I might've changed that around
You're swinging your opinion around as if its a fact, talking about people having to prove you wrong and not being willing to admit you're right. That's not how opinions work, chief.Of course my opinion is in the minority here, this is a United forum. It's hard for a United fan (and I'm a United fan) to admit that their best defender's best season this century was far below the best season of the defender of his biggest rival.
But Gerrard didn't combine playmaking and goalscoring? Even Gerrard's biggest fans wouldn't try and say he was a midfielder capable of dictating the tempo of the game.
At this point, you are an absolute troll. Gerrard and playmaking are not words you associate with each other. Your posting can feck off.
Sure you are entitled to your opinion, but Gerrard wasn't even the best playmaker at his own club.I think Gerrard was better than Scholes but it's not the number of times he was in the team of the season (although that shows longevity). Gerrard is my 1st pick based on all-round capabilities and best form. Although maybe if Scholes had combined the best of his goalscoring form and best of his playmaking form at any particular time I might've changed that around
Of course my opinion is in the minority here, this is a United forum. It's hard for a United fan (and I'm a United fan) to admit that their best defender's best season this century was far below the best season of the defender of his biggest rival.
Que Jorginho 2021 season greater than any season by any DM in the history of the game.
Like Jorginho is the best DM of all time given all the awards he won that season
to admit that their best defender's best season this century was far below the best season of the defender of his biggest rival.
Jorginho didn’t even finish in PL team of the year that season, not the same comparison.
Again, I never said that VvD is the best centre-back in history. I just said he had the best year for a centre-back in this century. You are using the scarecrow fallacy.
Liverpool will always be over rated because the media is full of scouse and ex players. It won’t change until the demographic changes and I don’t see that ever happening. Benitez’s Liverpool were grouped in as a “top 4” side despite their league performances never matching that title. Oh and Lawrensen predicted a 159 (4.1 seasons) game unbeaten run for Liverpool with the BBC never seemingly questioning his reasoning, so much for unbiased.The overrating of this bloke will end up ruining his legacy. The ridiculous hyperbole is meme material at this point.
He was Premier League's best player, UEFA's best player, UEFA's best defender, MOTM in the final of UCL (see vidic in final of 2011),
It isn't apples and apples. Jorginho is more a deep-lying playmaker than a pure #6 like Makelele, Vieira, Casemiro that you mentioned. I think the competition would be with Xabi Alonso and Pirlo. Jorginho was neither Italy's best player in the Euro (it was Donnaruma), nor Chelsea's best player in the UCL (it was Kanté). Mount was chosen by the Chelsea fans as the team's best player of the year. VvD in 2019 was the best CB I've seen play. He actually played enough to be compared to the best season by any CB this century. It's not the same with Jorginho. Jorginho 2021 isn't even close to Pirlo 2006 or 2012 for exemple. Xabi Alonso 2012 was way better than Jorginho 2021, Schweinsteiger 2013 was way better too. I don't just base it on the individual awards but also on the player's performance level.Can we say Jorginho has the best year for a DM in this century and draw similar conclusions from it in a Jorginho vs any DM e.g Makelele Kante Keane Viera, Casemiro etc like you are doing for VVD vs Vidic
No way man, even close. VvD in 2019 was second in the Balon d'Or by a very thin margin (less than 10 points) competing with Messi. He was Premier League's best player, UEFA's best player, UEFA's best defender, MOTM in the final of UCL (see vidic in final of 2011), FIFPro World XI, team of The tournament from nations League, UCL Team of the Tournament, PFA team of The tournament, pfa player of The season. Vidic was just Barclays player of The season and FIFA team of the year. It's embarrassing to make this comparison.
No way, mate. I'm a United fan. But I know how to recognize the talent of a player who is not on the team I support. If I were a fanatic, my all-time Premier League XI would have all United players.So @Isafim is one more Liverpool fan who is too embarrassed to put Liverpool in support field.
I find it odd that you tried to sneak that one in. Unless you think there's a genuine comparison to be made between Vidic facing one of the greatest club sides of all time featuring peak Messi and Van Dijk facing Tottenham, then why bother mentioning it?
Liverpool will always be over rated because the media is full of scouse and ex players. It won’t change until the demographic changes and I don’t see that ever happening. Benitez’s Liverpool were grouped in as a “top 4” side despite their league performances never matching that title. Oh and Lawrensen predicted a 159 (4.1 seasons) game unbeaten run for Liverpool with the BBC never seemingly questioning his reasoning, so much for unbiased.
In terms of VVD. He had a great couple of seasons and technically he is a very good player. But there’s no way he is even in an all time prem 11. Rio and Vidic were complimentary of each others skills sets and very dominating over a long period of time. Terry and Carvalho have the best defensive record in a 38 game season that probably won’t ever be beaten and individually Terry scored the most goals for a defender (not including penalties). Could also ping an accurate long ball with his left foot.
I don’t see him even coming close to matching any 4 of these guys. Not as a unit and not as an individual.
He was in the CL squad of the season UEFA squad of the season and FIFA teams of the year in addition to UEFA men's player of the year which no DM has ever won before
Of course my opinion is in the minority here, this is a United forum. It's hard for a United fan (and I'm a United fan) to admit that their best defender's best season this century was far below the best season of the defender of his biggest rival.
I think Gerrard was better than Scholes but it's not the number of times he was in the team of the season (although that shows longevity). Gerrard is my 1st pick based on all-round capabilities and best form. Although maybe if Scholes had combined the best of his goalscoring form and best of his playmaking form at any particular time I might've changed that around
100%Liverpool fan
No you're notOf course my opinion is in the minority here, this is a United forum. It's hard for a United fan (and I'm a United fan) to admit that their best defender's best season this century was far below the best season of the defender of his biggest rival.
I think Gerrard was better than Scholes but it's not the number of times he was in the team of the season (although that shows longevity). Gerrard is my 1st pick based on all-round capabilities and best form. Although maybe if Scholes had combined the best of his goalscoring form and best of his playmaking form at any particular time I might've changed that around