ti vu
Full Member
- Joined
- Jun 16, 2015
- Messages
- 12,799
Teaching Liverpool well. They're all aura defending in Militao goal.
Last edited:
The problem with this title of his, is that it was given by the media, who as we are well aware, have about 90% allegiance to Liverpool.The best CB in premier league history....
For me Vidic is as good as any CB I’ve seen in the PL. I’d have give him the slight edge over Rio. Terry would be number 3 for me.I loved him too, but I think JT and Rio are out on their own for the reasons stated. Rio defined a new era of central defenders.
Vidic was colossal for us, but probably only for 3/4 seasons. He never came back 100% from the ACL vs Basel.
As a pair, Rio and Vidic were perfect. Both covered each others weaknesses. If I could take a pair, it would be those two. Individually, I think JT shades Vidic.
At his peak he was the best in the world, you can make a case of who was better strictly talking about peaks.The problem with this title of his, is that it was given by the media, who as we are well aware, have about 90% allegiance to Liverpool.
He had a couple of absolute brilliant seasons but I still wouldn’t have had him over the established elite Rio/Vidic/Terry/Carvalho. I possibly wouldnt have him over peak William Gallas due to Gallas’ versatility.
Given his current plight has now gone for an extended period of time I’d say he should no longer be considered World class and instead be firmly in the tier below. Just a decent international quality player. That’s no insult to him but he has not had enough consistent form to be a truly elite defender.
Yeah I say that’s pretty fair. But if his decline continues and his peak proves to be incredibly brief, then there’s simply no way on gods earth he could be considered amongst the best ever. The scouse loving media will continue to place him there though.At his peak he was the best in the world, you can make a case of who was better strictly talking about peaks.
But overall he has no chance, all the names you mentioned are well above him.
Vidic was extraordinary and in the top bracket.
Van Dijk is always backing off, he manages to shirk responsibility so much in defensive phases. He's a bystander in so many occasions
I think all 3 had ultimately something different to offer. Terry was slow as feck but his reading of the game kept that from hindering him and he could ping a mean hoof with his left foot. Vidic was at his peak a very very strong defender with little to no flaws although he never could handle prime Torres for some reason. Rio could have been at peak Barcelona, technically very sound and was pretty fast too. Honestly it’s very hard to pick a best for me but no doubt we won’t see better partnerships than Rio/Vidic and Terry/Carvalho for a very long time.For me Vidic is as good as any CB I’ve seen in the PL. I’d have give him the slight edge over Rio. Terry would be number 3 for me.
VVD is way behind the pack.
Vidic had like 1-2 poor games against Torres in all the times he faced him. Think this narrative keeps getting thrown out there.I think all 3 had ultimately something different to offer. Terry was slow as feck but his reading of the game kept that from hindering him and he could ping a mean hoof with his left foot. Vidic was at his peak a very very strong defender with little to no flaws although he never could handle prime Torres for some reason. Rio could have been at peak Barcelona, technically very sound and was pretty fast too. Honestly it’s very hard to pick a best for me but no doubt we won’t see better partnerships than Rio/Vidic and Terry/Carvalho for a very long time.
Yep, there’s a red card that’s given to his struggles v Torres when Vidic was sent off long after Torres was subbed out.Vidic had like 1-2 poor games against Torres in all the times he faced him. Think this narrative keeps getting thrown out there.
Vvd isn't close to kompany or vidic. Catch yourself on. They don't it for longer at as high or higher a level. Vvd had 2 maybe 3? Great seasons.Rio and JT probably the best two for longevity and maintaining such a prolonged peak.
VVD didn't do it for long enough. On a level below with Vidic, Kompany, Carvalho and I guess a few more from the 90's like Stam, Adams etc.
This myth needs to die.Vidic was at his peak a very very strong defender with little to no flaws although he never could handle prime Torres for some reason.
I think all 3 had ultimately something different to offer. Terry was slow as feck but his reading of the game kept that from hindering him and he could ping a mean hoof with his left foot. Vidic was at his peak a very very strong defender with little to no flaws although he never could handle prime Torres for some reason. Rio could have been at peak Barcelona, technically very sound and was pretty fast too. Honestly it’s very hard to pick a best for me but no doubt we won’t see better partnerships than Rio/Vidic and Terry/Carvalho for a very long time.
For some reason it won't. It's just repeated ad nauseam and taken as a fact. He had a couple of poor games against him, but "handled" him just as many times if not more.This myth needs to die.
For some reason it won't. It's just repeated ad nauseam and taken as a fact. He had a couple of poor games against him, but "handled" him just as many times if not more.
As for "hard to pick a best", honestly it's not really - Rio was a notch above all the others, then very close you have your Vidic, Terry, Carvalho (I had a soft spot for him), then the others.
Just thinking of van Dijk again, it's amazing how he approaches defending, it's like in dangerous moments he's trying to organise his non-responsibility, not committing, letting others make those last ditch tackles, being as far away as possible from the action. He's being portrayed as this leader, but he's a coward defensively.
This is it. It’s why I said yesterday that you can’t consider him a defender as he does no defending.Just thinking of van Dijk again, it's amazing how he approaches defending, it's like in dangerous moments he's trying to organise his non-responsibility, not committing, letting others make those last ditch tackles, being as far away as possible from the action. He's being portrayed as this leader, but he's a coward defensively.
PL CBs who were better than VVD include Rio, Vidic, Terry, Carvalho, Campbell, King, Adams, Stam, Kompany and Desailly. I'm sure there's some I've forgotten and VVD doesn't make the top 10 when put under real scrutiny.The problem with this title of his, is that it was given by the media, who as we are well aware, have about 90% allegiance to Liverpool.
He had a couple of absolute brilliant seasons but I still wouldn’t have had him over the established elite Rio/Vidic/Terry/Carvalho. I possibly wouldnt have him over peak William Gallas due to Gallas’ versatility.
Given his current plight has now gone for an extended period of time I’d say he should no longer be considered World class and instead be firmly in the tier below. Just a decent international quality player. That’s no insult to him but he has not had enough consistent form to be a truly elite defender.
Unironically, VVD did/does defend with his "aura". It's like he'd just back off from attackers, knowing he had the pace and power to recover if he needed, but normally they'd make a mistake or pass sideways or backwardsFor some reason it won't. It's just repeated ad nauseam and taken as a fact. He had a couple of poor games against him, but "handled" him just as many times if not more.
As for "hard to pick a best", honestly it's not really - Rio was a notch above all the others, then very close you have your Vidic, Terry, Carvalho (I had a soft spot for him), then the others.
Just thinking of van Dijk again, it's amazing how he approaches defending, it's like in dangerous moments he's trying to organise his non-responsibility, not committing, letting others make those last ditch tackles, being as far away as possible from the action. He's being portrayed as this leader, but he's a coward defensively.
Personally I'd say Jaap Stam is the best I've seen , there's at least 10 better than Van Dijk in the Premier league era. It was a joke they called him the best ever. Nearly as bad as calling Trent a world class defenderFor some reason it won't. It's just repeated ad nauseam and taken as a fact. He had a couple of poor games against him, but "handled" him just as many times if not more.
As for "hard to pick a best", honestly it's not really - Rio was a notch above all the others, then very close you have your Vidic, Terry, Carvalho (I had a soft spot for him), then the others.
Just thinking of van Dijk again, it's amazing how he approaches defending, it's like in dangerous moments he's trying to organise his non-responsibility, not committing, letting others make those last ditch tackles, being as far away as possible from the action. He's being portrayed as this leader, but he's a coward defensively.
He literally had one bad moment letting the ball bounce against him in about a dozen meetings. Absolutely baffling that this myth persists as if no defender has ever made a mistake that was capitalised by a striker.Vidic was at his peak a very very strong defender with little to no flaws although he never could handle prime Torres for some reason.
I think all 3 had ultimately something different to offer. Terry was slow as feck but his reading of the game kept that from hindering him and he could ping a mean hoof with his left foot. Vidic was at his peak a very very strong defender with little to no flaws although he never could handle prime Torres for some reason. Rio could have been at peak Barcelona, technically very sound and was pretty fast too. Honestly it’s very hard to pick a best for me but no doubt we won’t see better partnerships than Rio/Vidic and Terry/Carvalho for a very long time.
Personally I'd say Jaap Stam is the best I've seen , there's at least 10 better than Van Dijk in the Premier league era. It was a joke they called him the best ever. Nearly as bad as calling Trent a world class defender
Torres scored 3 in 15 games vs United so nowhere near as great vs Vidic as people make outHe literally had one bad moment letting the ball bounce against him in about a dozen meetings. Absolutely baffling that this myth persists as if no defender has ever made a mistake that was capitalised by a striker.
Yeah that would be a short argument too.TAA a world class defender? One could argue that he was a world class player at one point, but never in a million years was he ever a world class defender.
Possibly but big mistakes tend to stick with people more than consistent performances. I could be wrong but I believe he struggled in a few games against Torres. Not just the game he was sent off and run around. But it was years ago so again I could be remembering wrong.Rio pretty fast too? He was absolutely rapid and won foot races with prime Etoo and prime Torres. Ferguson had him down as the top five fastest players he had ever had, not even mentioning Ronaldo in that discussion. Terry was brilliant when play suited him. When Villas Boas took over, Terry was quite poor because of the high line. He was much more suited to Mourinho's style of play. I struggle to see a system where Rio would not thrive. He would probably be at his very best in an expansive style with a high line - most likely absolutely brilliant in Pep's City set-up.
Not sure if Vidic really struggled that much with Torres overall, but it's a bit like the myth of Evra and Lennon - a couple of matches skewed the perception of many.
Seen plenty of people claiming he's the best player in his position (RB) in the world, a massive part of his position is being able to defend. The hype has gone to his head so much he thinks he doesn't even have to work hard to try and defend situations because he's so good at passingTAA a world class defender? One could argue that he was a world class player at one point, but never in a million years was he ever a world class defender.
Torres scored 3 in 15 games vs United so nowhere near as great vs Vidic as people make out
Its a myth that won't die.