croadyman
Prepare for despair
- Joined
- Mar 9, 2018
- Messages
- 40,022
I noticed in his last post match interview he gave it the usual spiel about loving the club, fans etc then said who knows in the summer
They reportedly value Osimhen at £62m. What kind of discount would we realistically get for including Hojlund in a prospective deal? £15m - £20m? It probably doesn't move the dial very much in terms of affordability, especially when you factor in massive wages for Osimhen.
He's too expensive.
Should be, but Napoli owner is notorious for being a hard ass.Isn't £62m his release clause (€75m)?
Surely with (a) his contract expiring in 2026 and (b) everything that's happened between him and the club that figure is a pipe-dream.
According to Fabrizio Romano, the release clause and the contract length are related, in that, when the release clause drops to the figure you mention (currently it is approx 130m euros) at the end of June, the club gain a + 1 year option on his contract. There is an article on Napoli's website that announces the option to 2027, in connection with his loan move to Galatasaray.Isn't £62m his release clause (€75m)?
Surely with (a) his contract expiring in 2026 and (b) everything that's happened between him and the club that figure is a pipe-dream.
The main issue isn't likely to be the fee, it's going to be his contract, there are a number of clubs who will be interested in him and can probably offer better contracts than we canAccording to Fabrizio Romano, the release clause and the contract length are related, in that, when the release clause drops to the figure you mention (currently it is approx 130m euros) next summer (end of June), the club gain a + 1 year option on his contract. There is an article on Napoli's website that announces the option to 2027, in connection with his loan move to Galatasaray.
Disneyland no more???can probably offer better contracts than we can
I've got a bad feeling Pool will grab him and he'll do well there. With Nunez all but confirmed to be out in the summer, they'll be in the market for an established striker.Feels like the kind of expensive striker Chelsea would sign, he'd flop badly and be sold to Spain/Italy the next season
Yes, but he also doesn’t want him back at Napoli. Their relationship is too fractured. So there might be a deal to be done. I would worry about potential salary expectations though. He would need to understand that he’s coming to a club with financial difficultiesShould be, but Napoli owner is notorious for being a hard ass.
Of course not the points deductions from breaching PSR would cost us more than and poits gained!Disneyland no more???
On a serious note it does seem like he’ll indeed move this summer. I wonder how well he’d do in England
He's quick, would out pace most center backs and can jump as high as Ronaldo. His physically dominant don't worry about that.He’s supposed to be pretty average in the buildup isn’t he? We need a more complete striker imo. His physical advantages won’t be as effective in the PL.
While I agree that Amad aside all our attackers just want to score for themselves, it doesn't help when you have strikers with no attacking threat like Hojlund and Zirkzee.We don't create chances so the striker we sign is irrelevant. Until we employ attacking players that play for the team and have a larger skill set than shoot or massive hollywood passes across the pitch or wingers/fullbacks who put in crosses, than it doesn't matter what person is there, if there is nothing to put in the net, then they will not score.
We don't know how to attack because the players have 0 faith in the attackers to do anything with the ball. Happens all the time these days that we hesitate on passing forward because we know the forwards will just lose it again. That only gets fixed through confidence in your teammates, and that happens with better teammates who prove they are capable of not wasting attacks.I think he's perfectly suited to English football.
My concerns boil down to us. We don't know how to attack.
I hope we can get a good deal for him, then. I am not convinced by him, but we do need someone who at least knows how to play the position. Right now we have two non-strikers.Yes, but he also doesn’t want him back at Napoli. Their relationship is too fractured. So there might be a deal to be done. I would worry about potential salary expectations though. He would need to understand that he’s coming to a club with financial difficulties
The single biggest factor in a team creating chances is having a CF who has good movement and the ability to create chances for themselves and get shots off.We don't create chances so the striker we sign is irrelevant. Until we employ attacking players that play for the team and have a larger skill set than shoot or massive hollywood passes across the pitch or wingers/fullbacks who put in crosses, than it doesn't matter what person is there, if there is nothing to put in the net, then they will not score.
His salary expectations are too high. Which is why Chelsea walked away from the deal at the last minute. If Chelsea walked away from the deal due to how expensive it was, I have a hard time believing that we can or should be trying to do the deal.
Aside that we're creating a team who would soon be actually creative, Dorgu first instinct is to find the striker, Amad will do similar, add that to Bruno and possibly a signing like Quenda. Amorim system and shape actually is designed to maximize the number 9 scoring ability if done right. The problem was Rashford, Garnacho, Antony shoot first mindset, and the likes of Dalot being a zero at creating chances. Two of them will definitely be gone come summer while the likes of Garnacho and Dalot wouldn't be part of what should be the strongest 11.The single biggest factor in a team creating chances is having a CF who has good movement and the ability to create chances for themselves and get shots off.
Hojlund is statistically among the worst in the big leagues at getting big shots off, while Osimhen is very good with that. That's a Hojlund issue - not a Man United issue. Our other attackers all get more chances, touches and shots than he does. Osimhen would have a huge difference and give our players someone to play the ball into, and someone who wouldn't be bullied by opposing defences.
Hojlund has got 2 league goals, went the entire first half of last season without scoring in the league before a brief purple patch. Napoli are not paying that much for that. Maybe 25-20 million.I think he should be our no.1 CF target, but since we have financial problems, we could sell Hojlund to Napoli for 30-35m? So, not a straight swap, but would make it easier to get Osimhen, as I have read that there is interest from Napoli's side. I believe that Rasmus would get his confidence back and do well there, while we get a proper no.9 who can handle the pressure.
Wouldn't we sell them Garnacho instead, a player they want(ed) anyway and who seemed keen enough to go, and who probably could essentially be 'swapped' for Osimhen?I think he should be our no.1 CF target, but since we have financial problems, we could sell Hojlund to Napoli for 30-35m? So, not a straight swap, but would make it easier to get Osimhen, as I have read that there is interest from Napoli's side. I believe that Rasmus would get his confidence back and do well there, while we get a proper no.9 who can handle the pressure.
I'd rather sell Hojlund and Napoli seemingly have interest. Maybe McT can persuade him to join them. Also, why not selling both to them for a combined 80m? They should have enough money from the Kvicha and Osimhen deals. Also, individual deals are better for the PSR than straight swaps I think.Wouldn't we sell them Garnacho instead, a player they want(ed) anyway and who seemed keen enough to go, and who probably could essentially be 'swapped' for Osimhen?
Nicely said.Hope we actually go for him, would be an absolute no brainer. The only risk is injuries, but nothing is perfect... Provided he can stay fit, he'd be a ridiculous improvement and the single biggest semi realistic impact that any player could provide to our team. He's a beast of a striker and a handful for any defence. He doesn't have to be some super involved in the build up striker, but he has to be a striker that leads the line, can do the basics that all top CFs need (battle with CBs, hold up play, run in behind, and be able to get shots off and just be a danger man) and he absolute does all of those to a high level. Would go a long way to transforming our attack.
We need to stop thinking about random fake forwards who don't know how to score. This club needs a proven goalscorer first and foremost, at all times. A big club without a proven goalscorer to lead the line will always be a sure shot to have a flop season. Get in a proven goalscorer, give ourselves some breathing room in terms of being able to actually get results and start to build, and then go from there. You will never be a successful club if we keep taking punts on unproven forwards. There's too much pressure at this club that it'll never work.
B- The Serie A is very different (and easier) to the EPL and most strikers who were great there end up failing here
His salary expectations are too high. Which is why Chelsea walked away from the deal at the last minute. If Chelsea walked away from the deal due to how expensive it was, I have a hard time believing that we can or should be trying to do the deal.
He previously played in the French league for Lille and was excellent there as well, he was actually a relative big money signing for NapoliI haven't followed the story super closely, but I can't help wonder if he was that good why is he playing in a 2nd tier league in Turkey at 26 years old.
I haven't followed the story super closely, but I can't help wonder if he was that good why is he playing in a 2nd tier league in Turkey at 26 years old.
What I do find interesting is that our team tend to look for and find certain attackers much more regularly than others.We don't create chances so the striker we sign is irrelevant. Until we employ attacking players that play for the team and have a larger skill set than shoot or massive hollywood passes across the pitch or wingers/fullbacks who put in crosses, than it doesn't matter what person is there, if there is nothing to put in the net, then they will not score.
So a slightly younger Lukaku is what you’re telling us he isHe comes from Serie A but he has the PL profile. Quick, very physical, athletic, great in the box, great aerially, and great in heading. Literally what PL is all about high pace, physical, and aerially very demanding. It’s about the profile. If he goes to La Liga then that’s where the doubt is whether he has the technical requirement to meet the La Liga’s profile.
Have you thought about why?What I do find interesting is that our team tend to look for and find certain attackers much more regularly than others.
For example - Weghorst would be on the pitch for minutes and no one would cross the ball or pass to him anywhere near the box, next thing you know Rashford replaces him up front and all of a sudden, they're crossing the ball (to Rashford who isn't particularly great in the air), and they're looking for him as much as possible.
Same goes for Højlund and Zirkzee. Zirkzee is very rarely in the box but our players instinctively look for him a lot more, and it feels like he gets a lot more clear chances (which he regularly fluffs by the way) than Højlund.
Is it that players like Højlund and Weghorst don't make the right runs, or is it our players don't trust them, having gotten their measure in training, or is it because they don't expect them to make the right run, so don't automatically look for them to pass the ball to? Perhaps a combination of all 3 things, but it is intriguing.
I think if you brought in a striker the team rated, they'd get more chances than say Højlund.