Vapor trail
Full Member
- Joined
- Mar 13, 2022
- Messages
- 1,280
This needs to happen above Kane.
He is below Kane.This needs to happen above Kane.
If we sell McTominay, VDB and Elanga, I’d sign Sabitzer and get Lavia. And Kamada on the free.
At a similar age, Kane was a nobodyHe is below Kane.
At a similar age, Kane was a nobody
But wouldn't we rather prefer a young player presently at very high levels, and can develop even further under ETH to seemingly world class levels? That was my point. And also just blanket statements saying that " X is below Y" without taking all factors into consideration really get my goat.At Kane's age Rooney was pretty much finished. Kluivert was fiinished even younger at 28. It obviously doesn't matter since young players playing well isn't in any way informative of their longevity at the highest levels.
But wouldn't we rather prefer a young player presently at very high levels, and can develop even further under ETH to seemingly world class levels? That was my point. And also just blanket statements saying that " X is below Y" without taking all factors into consideration really get my goat.
Kane is one of the best PL strikers of all time but may not be necessarily what we need when we are rebuilding.
Sorry it gets your goat but I did not realise I had to explain every factor to you but let me put it this way:But wouldn't we rather prefer a young player presently at very high levels, and can develop even further under ETH to seemingly world class levels? That was my point. And also just blanket statements saying that " X is below Y" without taking all factors into consideration really get my goat.
Kane is one of the best PL strikers of all time but may not be necessarily what we need when we are rebuilding.
Kane is too old and has no upside when selling.
You can buy a few of these types of profiles but we already have a few like casemiro and Varane. We need to be buying young to fill the team with people who can play at their current or even better levels for the next 5 years. Not just 1-2 seasons
Just looking at the stats on sky.
Bruno 3rd most chances created in the league only a few behind De Bryune.
Erickson 3rd most assists again a few behind De Bruyne.
City goals scored 67, us 41. I think the biggest difference being that they have a proper goal scorer at centre forward. If we actually want to compete we need a striker.
He is below Kane.
I've a feeling he'll buy someone less expected. Neither Kane or Osimhen.
I'm unsure on Osimhen. He looks awkward to me.
Come on he is at least level
Could live with a Ramos/Kolo-Muani IF by some miracle Rapha and Casa can persuade Benzema
No chance. Especially if they don’t get top 4. I heard ighalo has told him if he moves to the prem then join us.I think he will go to Chelsea
I still want Kane as no.1, so long as Napoli keep being Napoli and hold him on for a while longer and keep developing him.
I think ETH is flexible and likes players who can play in different positions.
He might buy someone who can also play wide and then have them interchange with Rashford.
I'm unsure on Osimhen. Napoli are very dominant this year and Serie A isn't the highest standard anyway.
I guess that's where scouts earn their money, they watch lots of games.
Even in his highlight videos I find him not too impressive. He's brilliant physically but doesn't look silky, maybe it doesn't matter.
Drogba was similar and I liked him a lot.
Top clubs tend to get top players without champions league. I don't think Osimehen has any preference and would take any of the big clubs in the Premier league. Why I think Chelsea will get him is because they will lay the ridiculous price Napoli setsNo chance. Especially if they don’t get top 4. I heard ighalo has told him if he moves to the prem then join us.
Surely if he’s ambitious though he only has to look at the state of that club to know that it would be the wrong move.Top clubs tend to get top players without champions league. I don't think Osimehen has any preference and would take any of the big clubs in the Premier league. Why I think Chelsea will get him is because they will lay the ridiculous price Napoli sets
Not sure he is the DDG replacement we are looking for?!I still want Kane as no.1, so long as Napoli keep being Napoli and hold him on for a while longer and keep developing him.
Would be good enough with the ball on his feet! And most probably better at catching crosses.Not sure he is the DDG replacement we are looking for?!
How about this?Would be good enough with the ball on his feet! And most probably better at catching crosses.
He seems to be the forward with the most hype at the moment - I understand his strenghts, but can someone break down his weaknesses for me?
It seems to me that his weaknesses are essentially Jesus's strengths, and Jesus has slotted in seamlessly and hit the ground running with his selfless link-up play. Could Osimhen do the same thing?
I feel like his game is very different to Jesus's, and I can't tell if that would be a good or bad thing for us. Right now I'm leaning towards bad.
Presuming that you are Italian but is it still accurate to call the Italian league a more tactical and slower league? I think Atalanta, Napoli and Lazio teams in recent years have played really quick paced football that is as exciting as pretty much any top league elsewhere is playing.He is uncatchable in Serie A but you all know it is a more tactical / slower league, which suits his sharpness perfectly, when coupled with the possession-based yet extremely transitional Spallettiball. It remains to be seen how he fares in the one vs one/two/three against comparable athletes such the most he will find in the PL. It also remains to be seen how he fares in a more pragmatic / lower tempo setup, if you want him at United.
If you want a comparison, think of Immobile, who is a transitional monster yet pretty limited outside of that (as his abroad and NT experience proved too well). Osimhen has a different engine for sure but his buyer will be paying for peak (150m according to the latest words of De Laurentiis) not for potential (half that sum) with, say, the currently subdued Vlahovic who has all the tools but not the finished article yet.
Presuming that you are Italian but is it still accurate to call the Italian league a more tactical and slower league? I think Atalanta, Napoli and Lazio teams in recent years have played really quick paced football that is as exciting as pretty much any top league elsewhere is playing.
I think Osimhen is always going to get goals even outside of counter-attacks due to his heading ability and because he's so good off the ball. He also makes runs which tear defences all over the place but unlike a lot of our other forwards, he isn't afraid to run into congested areas where he will be required to compete. Our other players tend to shy away from these runs preferring to move where there's space instead. I always wished we could have signed Cavani when he was in his mid-20s and I feel that Osimhen could offer similar qualities.
That, and finishing.Feel like the only thing that Kane has over him is the playmaking ability,yes he isn't Premier League proven but that's not essential
That, and finishing.
In fact you could turn it round and say the only things Osimhen has over Kane are age and speed.
Be delighted with either.
Totally…That, and finishing.
In fact you could turn it round and say the only things Osimhen has over Kane are age and speed.
Be delighted with either.