Vidyoyo
The bad "V"
Okay one thing I'll say in his defence is that the stupid thing he does with his hands looks a little less dumb on nights like tonight.
That's enough caf for one night. Watching them both dither on the ball before inevitably kicking it out of play would be my worst nightmare. Couldn't imagine a worse CB pairing in our PL history.We should have never let Smalling go. I was adamant at the time.
Why we never even tried a Smalling Maguire partnership (when Maguire had just signed) is beyond me.
That's enough caf for one night. Watching them both dither on the ball before inevitably kicking it out of play would be my worst nightmare. Couldn't imagine a worse CB pairing in our PL history.
Smallings passing was fine, it just wasn't ambitious and he would play safe passes, and look ungainly doing it. I could imagine plenty of worse centre back pairings. Hell, I don't even need to imagine, seen several with my own eyes over last few years.
Smalling is/was a far better defender and useful in both boxes, unlike Lindelof who is a liability. But yeah a few nice passes to the midfield here and there is more important than the goals conceded.That's enough caf for one night. Watching them both dither on the ball before inevitably kicking it out of play would be my worst nightmare. Couldn't imagine a worse CB pairing in our PL history.
If we hold that much stock in our CBs being a threat from set pieces then let's sign James Tarkowski and hire Sean Dyche as our manager.Smalling is/was a far better defender and useful in both boxes, unlike Lindelof who is a liability. But yeah a few nice passes to the midfield here and there is more important than the goals conceded.
In the last two season City have scored 35 set piece goals to our 12. We're bad at defending them too. But keeping dismissing it as irrelevant.If we hold that much stock in our CBs being a threat from set pieces then let's sign James Tarkowski and hire Sean Dyche as our manager.
Not saying I rate Lindelof that highly. He's our 4th choice CB for a reason. But if our aim is to consistently sustain attacks then we need all of our CBs to be good on the ball. I watched Smalling kick the ball out for a throw-in countless times down the years.
It is very relevant. If we look at our starting XI it is only Varane and Casemiro who are good in the air, the rest are poor (now we have added Rasmus, that will strengthen that area).In the last two season City have scored 35 set piece goals to our 12. We're bad at defending them too. But keeping dismissing it as irrelevant.
Its not just CBs, it's a problem with having such a physically weak side across the 11.
It's part of why I'm not as high on Martinez as others. Basically starting with one physical presence down in either box where you would usually expect one. We don't make up for it elsewhere.It is very relevant. If we look at our starting XI it is only Varane and Casemiro who are good in the air, the rest are poor (now we have added Rasmus, that will strengthen that area).
I remember the narrative from smalling haters was that he constantly holds and would be found out by VAR. How’d that work out?Smalling is/was a far better defender and useful in both boxes, unlike Lindelof who is a liability. But yeah a few nice passes to the midfield here and there is more important than the goals conceded.
I remember the narrative from smalling haters was that he constantly holds and would be found out by VAR. How’d that work out?
I remember he used to try afew years ago and would get rashford behind the opposition defence quite a few times. Don't really see if any more.He does know he's playing football and not rugby, Christ alive try and break some lines when passing.
That's what we get if you partner him with a proper defender
Always solid. Not a game winning monster defender but a solid guy and decent defender. He'd look great at city or arsenal imo
Never said first choice. He's no worse than Ake ffs.Why do people keep peddling this myth. He's nowhere near their first choice players and would be at best 3rd/4th choice over there, the same he is here. The 'oh those teams don't require as much defending individually and require more quality on the ball' would make sense if Lindelof actually consistently showed he's really good on the ball but he's hasn't. He never delivers on his own terms, it's always circumstantial.
Our most senior defender with the most amount of appearances and minutes played scared, took no responsibility on the ball and in the first half was outshone by a 35 year old, who joined in the summer and has barely any minutes in his legs this season. Second half he started to actually play and contribute because we sat behind the ball and was already 1-0 ahead.
So passive.
Never said first choice. He's no worse than Ake ffs.
Is it not somewhat striking that Johnny Evans comes out of cold storage and immediately becomes the leader of the back 4? Lindelof just doesn't have that in him.
It's like I'm speaking to a robot. Like seriously, he would be a decent squad player and would look good at city. It's all I've said.He's nowhere near as athletically or tactically versatile as Ake. He'll be 5th choice at best behind Akanji, Dias, Ake and Gvardiol; that's not taking into account with Walker or Rodri tucking/dropping in. 'He'll look great for City' in the same way McTominay would be a great goal scoring/attacking midfielder if he played further up the pitch for another team. Yes it could happen but it's mostly conjecture based on little evidence of what they've achieved here.
It's like I'm speaking to a robot. Like seriously, he would be a decent squad player and would look good at city. It's all I've said.
Good lord.
What's the fecking point of nothing posts like these?Pussy
You're talking to someone with an irrational, bordering on obsessive dislike for Lindelöf.It's like I'm speaking to a robot. Like seriously, he would be a decent squad player and would look good at city. It's all I've said.
Good lord.
No. Clear that I am not talking about him being a starter but just commenting on his attributes and that they'd suit a team like City. To you, this meant I thought he could be a starter and then started telling me how he'd be sixth choice.You posted a comment to which I disagreed and added some thoughts with examples and a logical explanation. That's as civil as you can ask for on a discussion board.
If you get triggered by that, stay off the internet ffs. It's like I'm talking to a child.
See what I did there?
No. Clear that I am not talking about him being a starter but just commenting on his attributes and that they'd suit a team like City. To you, this meant I thought he could be a starter and then started telling me how he'd be sixth choice.
Somewhat. Lindelof isn't a leader and does benefit from playing with someone who is.
It's funny because last year I remember quite specifically how some posters pointed out he was some great leader because ETH praised him (just like how he has with every single player in the squad including Ronaldo and De Gea) and that he's Sweden's captain. It's really damning on Lindelof, as the most senior defender at the club in his 7th season with the club, that he still can't show any leadership quality on the pitch against Burnley and had to constantly defer to a 35 year old.