HackeyC
Full Member
- Joined
- Dec 31, 2018
- Messages
- 549
Balls are round, pretty sure it was still in.
Good luck with thatThat should be a red for Fabinho feck me
Most obvious red I’ve seen all year. Literally jumps into it as well.Good luck with that
Nice waste of three minutes. I know they have to draw the lines etc but fecking hell.
Oh, so it works?
I didn't understand the blue line either. There didn't look like any West Ham player near itThey've shown more replays of Casemiro's offside than they did of the ball going out within 5 seconds.
Where the feck have they drawn the blue line? It's clear as day offside and they've made it an absolute mess.
There’s a foot hidden behind CasemiroI didn't understand the blue line either. There didn't look like any West Ham player near it
This! Does my head in it's all just made up.So Bruno delicately touching a players arm is enough for a penalty.
A defender pushing two hands across Garnacho is “never enough contact”.
Can we just have a bit of consistency?
+1Balls are round, pretty sure it was still in.
He is immune to red cards. I've rarely seen a player having so much luck. He should have about 5-6 red cards already this season.https://streamin.me/v/71842a61
I’m actually annoyed by this. Fabinho in all his glory
Pretty clear that ball was out but we'll hear nothing about it as we won.
Ball was probably in play, offside was clear, so no real qualms there.
But... Can someone clarify what constitutes a yellow card? Cos fecked if this ref has a clue
That angle is pretty conclusive IMOThe above isn't the best angle either. You need the view from above as it's a ball, it's a spherical shape (like you see with goal line technology)
I am not too annoyed that this wasn't given and they went with refs on field call. It's frustrating but it's not 109% conclusive. The players stopping and not playing to the whistle was annoying .
The way the ref gave yellow cards was annoying especially the few he missed giving them on same situations that lead to us getting a few.
That angle is pretty conclusive IMO
I think so yeah. You can see a clear gap side on.Is it? Just reminds me of the Japan/Spain decision to be honest. The furthest side of the ball could definitely still be over the line, even if its by 1mm.
No. The ball is spherical. You need to look from above to be sure. If that angle is not there, for whatever reason, it cannot be ruled out.Weirdly the var angle makes it look in. I wasn’t outraged at the time given that picture that we saw.
Turns out I was wrong!
How would looking at it from above be any different? There is a line of green visible between the edge of the ball and the white line all the way up the touch line. How would that be the case if any part of the ball met the line ? From any angle the line of green would stop existing at the point of contact between ball and lineNo. The ball is spherical. You need to look from above to be sure. If that angle is not there, for whatever reason, it cannot be ruled out.
Yeah but the ball is sphericalHow would looking at it from above be any different? There is a line of green visible between the edge of the ball and the white line all the way up the touch line. How would that be the case if any part of the ball met the line ? From any angle the line of green would stop existing at the point of contact between ball and line
That’s not how you judge these situation though. If a linesman saw the situation from that pic he would flag.No. The ball is spherical. You need to look from above to be sure. If that angle is not there, for whatever reason, it cannot be ruled out.
How would looking at it from above be any different? There is a line of green visible between the edge of the ball and the white line all the way up the touch line. How would that be the case if any part of the ball met the line ? From any angle the line of green would stop existing at the point of contact between ball and line