NotChatGPT
Brownfinger
- Joined
- Jul 3, 2023
- Messages
- 2,089
No matter what you do ref offside there's always going to be extreme margins between onside and offside.
No there absolutely should not. Because you know exactly how it will be used and who will be given benefit of the doubt and who will not. No fecking way that you very much.
Hmmm
We'll have that Hawkeye shit soon so be prepared for the skin of their kneecap or the very tip of their boots ruling out goals.
Still think it should be based purely on feet but other than that offside is offside
I'll take that over a Liverpool fan deciding where to draw lines on a screen.We'll have that Hawkeye shit soon so be prepared for the skin of their kneecap or the very tip of their boots ruling out goals.
Wouldn't that cause more offsides? I think they made the lines thinner to avoid situations like that. It should rule out a goal because he was offside, I don't get the confusion. If they made the attacker have more leeway we'd just be arguing about whether there was enough leeway given or not. Objectivity is the way to go. There were plenty of tight calls made incorrectly before VAR, nothing worse than scoring a good goal and have it incorrectly ruled out, or situations like the Drogba goal.It can still be objective. All they need to do is give the attacker a thicker line so more goals like thse are onside. I genuinely have no idea why your shoulder being 5mm offside should rule a goal out. Before VAR no one would have ever even suggested that that was an offside.
Those margin are somehow always ending in negative way for us.No matter what you do ref offside there's always going to be extreme margins between onside and offside.
Hmmm
Explain to me how it’s offsideI'm amazed that people have an issue with that offside call. It's one of the few objective laws and I'm glad its being consistently called correctly. I'd be fuming if that goal had stood against us.
You’re completely missing how arbitrary where the lines are drawn is. You’re still going to have offsides which are impossibly tight and equally frustrating if you give the attacker an additional inch, foot or yard. A line has to be drawn and occasionally there will be a tight one like this.I disagree mate, goals being ruled out for a shoulder being marginally offside is a nonsense.
But if the attacker had a thicker line under the exact same rules and implementation of where they apply the lines that would have been onside.
Explain to me how it’s offside
They’ve done the line from Fulham’s armpit and United’s hand…
This should be fun..
Clearly not as objective as people are making it seem when those who draw the lines get them in the wrong spots
Hmmm
It's based on whatever part of your body you can play the ball with is furthest forward, be it armpit, foot, head, knee, backsideIt's currently based off the armpit so I think that's fair enough. I don't see how the feet would be any fairer.
However, we don't know what they're going to do with the automated system. Will they keep it at the armpit given they'll no longer need to draw lines?
Actually zoom in and look at the picture. The red line is United. How is that line anywhere near Amad’s armpit? It’s not even close to itThey haven't.
Wouldn't that cause more offsides? I think they made the lines thinner to avoid situations like that. It should rule out a goal because he was offside, I don't get the confusion. If they made the attacker have more leeway we'd just be arguing about whether there was enough leeway given or not. Objectivity is the way to go. There were plenty of tight calls made incorrectly before VAR, nothing worse than scoring a good goal and have it incorrectly ruled out, or situations like the Drogba goal.
Hmmm
You can't score with your armHow’s the right arm not playing him onside?
Those margin are somehow always ending in negative way for us.
How can people be certain that it is offside is beyond me.
Got no idea why it’s not automated. Technology is there and it removes human error. Cause clearly we can’t rely on these plonkers.and when dealing in millimetres freezing it after the ball has left mainoos foot.
Got no idea why it’s not automated. Technology is there and it removes human error. Cause clearly we can’t rely on these plonkers.
Amad's hand is in line with his shoulder, they've drawn the line from both players shoulders. Amad is leaning forward so his shoulder is slightly ahead of the defender's shoulder. Pretty cut and dry in my opinion.Explain to me how it’s offside
They’ve done the line from Fulham’s armpit and United’s hand…
This should be fun..
A thicker line for the position of the defender would absolutely reduce the number of razor-thin offside calls.You’re completely missing how arbitrary where the lines are drawn is. You’re still going to have offsides which are impossibly tight and equally frustrating if you give the attacker an additional inch, foot or yard. A line has to be drawn and occasionally there will be a tight one like this.
If your argument is you want the VAR to exert some subjective benefit of the doubt in cases like this, I promise you you will be screaming bloody murder when Michael Oliver ignores the lines and gives a goal against us and then refuses to do the same thing down the other end.
I just think the armpit makes no difference to who gets to the ball first. It's all about moving the feetIt's currently based off the armpit so I think that's fair enough. I don't see how the feet would be any fairer.
However, we don't know what they're going to do with the automated system. Will they keep it at the armpit given they'll no longer need to draw lines?
A thicker line for the position of the defender would absolutely reduce the number of razor-thin offside calls.
I'm pretty sure you cannot score from your shoulder.His shoulder was marginally offside. What advantage was gained?
You do know why the rule was introduced?
Actually zoom in and look at the picture. The red line is United. How is that line anywhere near Amad’s armpit? It’s not even close to it
Only it wouldn’t. Because lines are 2D and no matter how fat or thin they are there is still one edge that counts and that edge is always exactly the same thickness. All you’re doing is moving the problem around.A thicker line for the position of the defender would absolutely reduce the number of razor-thin offside calls.
If the defenders line is far thicker than the forwards line, then yes, it would. Hence why this approach has already been implemented, to a degree.It wouldn't. You'd just move the threshold.
I'm pretty sure you cannot score from your shoulder.
No. If the defenders line is, say, five times thicker than the forwards line, then the forward would have to be even more ‘offside’ than they currently are, for an offside call to be made.Only it wouldn’t. Because lines are 2D and no matter how fat or thin they are there is still one edge that counts and that edge is always exactly the same thickness. All you’re doing is moving the problem around.
Of course you canI'm pretty sure you cannot score from your shoulder.
You move the threshold sure, but at least we are not calling offside using technology that in no way can accurately tell us it is actually offside when it's that tight.It wouldn't. You'd just move the threshold.
If the defenders line is far thicker than the forwards line, then yes, it would. Hence why this approach has already been implemented, to a degree.
They would appear less tight in respect of the position of the players relative to one another.It wouldn't. You'd just move the threshold.
You move the threshold sure, but at least we are not calling offside using technology that in no way can accurately tell us it is actually offside when it's that tight.
It's absurd really and nothing than a calculated guess.
I don’t think you know what a shoulder is. Unless you think Amad is the Hunchback of Notre Dame, you’re not even closeAmad's hand is in line with his shoulder, they've drawn the line from both players shoulders. Amad is leaning forward so his shoulder is slightly ahead of the defender's shoulder. Pretty cut and dry in my opinion.