VAR, Refs and Linesmen | General Discussion

No matter what you do ref offside there's always going to be extreme margins between onside and offside.
 
No there absolutely should not. Because you know exactly how it will be used and who will be given benefit of the doubt and who will not. No fecking way that you very much.

We'll have that Hawkeye shit soon so be prepared for the skin of their kneecap or the very tip of their boots ruling out goals.
 
Still think it should be based purely on feet but other than that offside is offside

It's currently based off the armpit so I think that's fair enough. I don't see how the feet would be any fairer.

However, we don't know what they're going to do with the automated system. Will they keep it at the armpit given they'll no longer need to draw lines?
 
We'll have that Hawkeye shit soon so be prepared for the skin of their kneecap or the very tip of their boots ruling out goals.
I'll take that over a Liverpool fan deciding where to draw lines on a screen.
 
It can still be objective. All they need to do is give the attacker a thicker line so more goals like thse are onside. I genuinely have no idea why your shoulder being 5mm offside should rule a goal out. Before VAR no one would have ever even suggested that that was an offside.
Wouldn't that cause more offsides? I think they made the lines thinner to avoid situations like that. It should rule out a goal because he was offside, I don't get the confusion. If they made the attacker have more leeway we'd just be arguing about whether there was enough leeway given or not. Objectivity is the way to go. There were plenty of tight calls made incorrectly before VAR, nothing worse than scoring a good goal and have it incorrectly ruled out, or situations like the Drogba goal.
 
I'm amazed that people have an issue with that offside call. It's one of the few objective laws and I'm glad its being consistently called correctly. I'd be fuming if that goal had stood against us.
Explain to me how it’s offside

They’ve done the line from Fulham’s armpit and United’s hand…

This should be fun..
 
I disagree mate, goals being ruled out for a shoulder being marginally offside is a nonsense.



But if the attacker had a thicker line under the exact same rules and implementation of where they apply the lines that would have been onside.
You’re completely missing how arbitrary where the lines are drawn is. You’re still going to have offsides which are impossibly tight and equally frustrating if you give the attacker an additional inch, foot or yard. A line has to be drawn and occasionally there will be a tight one like this.


If your argument is you want the VAR to exert some subjective benefit of the doubt in cases like this, I promise you you will be screaming bloody murder when Michael Oliver ignores the lines and gives a goal against us and then refuses to do the same thing down the other end.
 
It's currently based off the armpit so I think that's fair enough. I don't see how the feet would be any fairer.

However, we don't know what they're going to do with the automated system. Will they keep it at the armpit given they'll no longer need to draw lines?
It's based on whatever part of your body you can play the ball with is furthest forward, be it armpit, foot, head, knee, backside
 
Wouldn't that cause more offsides? I think they made the lines thinner to avoid situations like that. It should rule out a goal because he was offside, I don't get the confusion. If they made the attacker have more leeway we'd just be arguing about whether there was enough leeway given or not. Objectivity is the way to go. There were plenty of tight calls made incorrectly before VAR, nothing worse than scoring a good goal and have it incorrectly ruled out, or situations like the Drogba goal.

They have made the lines thicker a few years ago as there were a lot of goals being ruled out when it was very tight and to account for the margin of error inherent in using a single frame of video. For you the be onside the lines need to overlap.
 
Christ I know I’m bad for moaning about referees, it’s probably 75% of my posts these days but pick your battles for Christ sake :lol: Amad was visibly offside there, the offside call was entirely expected.
 
actually starting to think now that it should be the linesmans call, with var only intervening if its the assist making pass. today for example, it clearly can be argued that he was on, and then fulham still had plenty of ways to stop a goal - its such an absurd advantage for a defending team.
 
Explain to me how it’s offside

They’ve done the line from Fulham’s armpit and United’s hand…

This should be fun..
Amad's hand is in line with his shoulder, they've drawn the line from both players shoulders. Amad is leaning forward so his shoulder is slightly ahead of the defender's shoulder. Pretty cut and dry in my opinion.
 
You’re completely missing how arbitrary where the lines are drawn is. You’re still going to have offsides which are impossibly tight and equally frustrating if you give the attacker an additional inch, foot or yard. A line has to be drawn and occasionally there will be a tight one like this.


If your argument is you want the VAR to exert some subjective benefit of the doubt in cases like this, I promise you you will be screaming bloody murder when Michael Oliver ignores the lines and gives a goal against us and then refuses to do the same thing down the other end.
A thicker line for the position of the defender would absolutely reduce the number of razor-thin offside calls.
 
It's currently based off the armpit so I think that's fair enough. I don't see how the feet would be any fairer.

However, we don't know what they're going to do with the automated system. Will they keep it at the armpit given they'll no longer need to draw lines?
I just think the armpit makes no difference to who gets to the ball first. It's all about moving the feet
 
VAR. Never not finding a way to make football less enjoyable. What a heap of shit. Even on something that should be completely objective like offside we end up going down rabbit holes about margins of error. The offside law is supposed to prevent goal-hanging, not someone being an inch or two beyond the last defender in the build up to a goal. This shit is a gross misuse of technology. I absolutely hate it.
 
A thicker line for the position of the defender would absolutely reduce the number of razor-thin offside calls.
Only it wouldn’t. Because lines are 2D and no matter how fat or thin they are there is still one edge that counts and that edge is always exactly the same thickness. All you’re doing is moving the problem around.
 
Only it wouldn’t. Because lines are 2D and no matter how fat or thin they are there is still one edge that counts and that edge is always exactly the same thickness. All you’re doing is moving the problem around.
No. If the defenders line is, say, five times thicker than the forwards line, then the forward would have to be even more ‘offside’ than they currently are, for an offside call to be made.
 
It wouldn't. You'd just move the threshold.
You move the threshold sure, but at least we are not calling offside using technology that in no way can accurately tell us it is actually offside when it's that tight.

It's absurd really and nothing than a calculated guess.
 
If the defenders line is far thicker than the forwards line, then yes, it would. Hence why this approach has already been implemented, to a degree.

It wouldn't. You're just creating an arbitrary line, there's always going to be extremely thin margins. You could say that a player is allowed to be offside by 1,5 and you'll still have the very same "issues" we have today.
 
You move the threshold sure, but at least we are not calling offside using technology that in no way can accurately tell us it is actually offside when it's that tight.

It's absurd really and nothing than a calculated guess.

But you'd still be using the same technology only for a different line.
 
Amad's hand is in line with his shoulder, they've drawn the line from both players shoulders. Amad is leaning forward so his shoulder is slightly ahead of the defender's shoulder. Pretty cut and dry in my opinion.
I don’t think you know what a shoulder is. Unless you think Amad is the Hunchback of Notre Dame, you’re not even close