Dunno mateHow is Darwin still on the pitch? Should've had 3 yellows at once.
- Forcefully pushing Evans.
- Kicking away the ball after the whistle.
- Sarcastically applauding the ref.
Dunno mateHow is Darwin still on the pitch? Should've had 3 yellows at once.
- Forcefully pushing Evans.
- Kicking away the ball after the whistle.
- Sarcastically applauding the ref.
How is Darwin still on the pitch? Should've had 3 yellows at once.
- Forcefully pushing Evans.
- Kicking away the ball after the whistle.
- Sarcastically applauding the ref.
I’d love to know the stats on how many cards have been handed out this season. I feel like United get at least two a game.
This is even more infuriating and ridiculous given his tragic handling of Dalot. Corrupt cnut.How is Darwin still on the pitch? Should've had 3 yellows at once.
- Forcefully pushing Evans.
- Kicking away the ball after the whistle.
- Sarcastically applauding the ref.
I actually only meant dissent too. I know United have some moany players but I would genuinely be astonished if United haven’t had way more for dissent than anybody else.It's way up theres more already than the entirety of last season.
That Shaw one was bullshit, he'll explain it away as 2 incidents of dissent but its clearly only one and as such should only be a yellow.
I don't think that it was totally bad game from him involving us. Sure, Liverpool got all 50/50 decisions and that Dalot red card is just phatetic. Thats it. We have been through lot worse. So I was expecting lot more. However we know how we are treated by referees. There is no need for explaination anymore. It was before. As long as we don't have mics and cam on referees this thing will keep on going.Scousers conceded 13 fouls, penalised with 2 yellow cards.
United conceded 8 fouls, penalised with 4 yellow cards and 1 red card.
Explanation required from the Geordie crook.
I actually only meant dissent too. I know United have some moany players but I would genuinely be astonished if United haven’t had way more for dissent than anybody else.
Fulham | 11 |
Newcastle United | 8 |
Tottenham Hotspur | 8 |
West Ham United | 7 |
Wolverhampton Wanderers | 7 |
Bournemouth | 6 |
Crystal Palace | 6 |
Brighton and Hove Albion | 5 |
Chelsea | 4 |
Liverpool | 4 |
Manchester United | 4 |
Sheffield United | 4 |
Arsenal | 2 |
Aston Villa | 2 |
Brentford | 2 |
Burnley | 2 |
Luton Town | 2 |
Nottingham Forest | 2 |
Everton | 1 |
Manchester City | 1 |
Our cub needs to make statement about referees.
Our cub needs to make statement about referees.
I'm glad that VAR didn't intervene for the Shaw 'handball', considering the Liverpool love-in. I think we got away with it because the ball deflected off his leg before striking his hand.
I was more surprised VAR didn't intervene and that there was only 1 replay for the challenge Amrabat made on Diaz after he missed, that one clearly showed Amrabat's studs going into Diaz's foot. We saw something similar given against Smalling with Cavani when we played Roma a few years back (though personally I thought that was a poor decision myself). Similarly, I also remember Dan James sliding in and completely taking out a Wolves player in a 0-1 away victory for us last season that went punished.
After all the VAR cock ups, it was ok last night for us.
I have no hope that it would help to much. What that would mean is that we don't accept this as a club. Sometimes it is just about pointing out that we are seeing how we have been treated. That we can't have one rule for us, the other rule for other teams. We can't have similar situations in exactly same game with different outcome. We can't have same situations in different games with different outcome.It's not a magic button...How did it work out for Wolves?
We hardly have backing in the media for a public approach, so the outcome is more likely to be even further scrutiny and less situations going our way.
It's a bit like Mourinho being banned for kicking a water bottle down the touchline, while Guardiola got nothing whatsoever later on for kicking a bottle straight into the oppositions bench that was full of players.
What i fail to understand is that clubs haven't worked together to get rid of the likes of Michael Oliver, and other refs, due to them officiating in certain countries with certain direct links to certain clubs in the league. Surely other clubs must have same/similar feelings about the potential risks involved and how it undermines referees
It’s actually unbelievable that, while the Negreira scandal in Spain is under investigation, we have referees who are being employed by one team’s owners, and they’re just letting them officiate that team’s games without anyone batting an eyelid.I have no hope that it would help to much. What that would mean is that we don't accept this as a club. Sometimes it is just about pointing out that we are seeing how we have been treated. That we can't have one rule for us, the other rule for other teams. We can't have similar situations in exactly same game with different outcome. We can't have same situations in different games with different outcome.
That thing about refereeing in other countries is so crazy and I can't believe that TheFA thinks it is good idea. Or accept it.
DERMOT SAYS: "It's so so difficult because this is not an exact science.
"On the one hand, you say to me I don't want two yellow cards for Dalot, but two minutes later you say you want a yellow for Salah and three for Nunez.
"I have nowhere to go. Whichever way I jump, you will say I'm wrong.
"In the current climate the referee has no choice. I get that United fans will call for Nunez to be sent off but the referee didn't choose to do it."
Such a weird guy
Yes we ask for cards for Salah and Nunez only because Dalot was given TWO cards. If Dalot was given just one card, no one would be talking about Nunez or Salah even though it would have been justified to ask.DERMOT SAYS: "It's so so difficult because this is not an exact science.
"On the one hand, you say to me I don't want two yellow cards for Dalot, but two minutes later you say you want a yellow for Salah and three for Nunez.
"I have nowhere to go. Whichever way I jump, you will say I'm wrong.
Such a weird guy
You have nowhere to go because you're trying to defend the indefensible. Why can't he see this? It's ok to say the ref got it wrong!
Why come on a review show if all you want to do is agree with the referees decision?You have nowhere to go because you're trying to defend the indefensible. Why can't he see this? It's ok to say the ref got it wrong!
I love how he creates a false narrative where people are suggesting Dalot shouldn't be booked for dissent but Nunez should, and therefore no matter what he says people will disagree with him.