Berbasbullet
Too Boring For A Funny Tagline
- Joined
- Nov 3, 2011
- Messages
- 21,791
Love them to explain why it isnt a foul? Anywhere else and it'd be a foul
VAR is a great tool by my fecking god are they butchering the application of it.
Clearest pen today was the one they should have had on Wilson.
it was thoughLike feck it was.
it was though
It wasn't the clearest one. It was a pen, but sanchos was the easiest one to give.it was though
Nope, Sancho's was clearer.it was though
It's obvious, it's being run by refs who don't want to show up each others mistakes. It's wildly inconsistent and doesn't work. A new system is needed.There’s an awful middle ground of refs letting things go that might be pens and VAR not wanting to get involved. It’s messing the game up and needs looked at.
They can say it’s to make getting pens tougher but it’s to cover up this middle ground that’s not doing anybody any favours
I’ve always said we need a panel of 3 in different rooms and majority decision wins. It would really stamp out one ref shitting the bed.It's obvious, it's being run by refs who don't want to show up each others mistakes. It's wildly inconsistent and doesn't work. A new system is needed.
Why don't they just have no on-field ref and then this 3-ref system? So the refs are not even on the pitch but can see everything at different angles in real time?I’ve always said we need a panel of 3 in different rooms and majority decision wins. It would really stamp out one ref shitting the bed.
From the video footage that you have seen them using, are you capable of making better decisions than they are?Evidence for that?
Good idea, but th is problem would still exist:I’ve always said we need a panel of 3 in different rooms and majority decision wins. It would really stamp out one ref shitting the bed.
They’re more interested in supporting their mate on the field personally than professionally.
Interestingly, Pawson had the clearest view of the incident in real time. Probably would have given it if not for the VAR systemVAR seems pointless - it just seems transferring the possibility of one human being making a mistake to another human being making a mistake.
Just play the game and stop wasting time. If the referee misses it - so what - the chances are that the person operating the VAR will too.
The whole point of VAR is to catch things that the on field ref misses. Currently it seems that the on field ref's decisions are given far more weight than the decision of someone watching slo-mo replays from several angles, it's madness in my opinion.VAR seems pointless - it just seems transferring the possibility of one human being making a mistake to another human being making a mistake.
Just play the game and stop wasting time. If the referee misses it - so what - the chances are that the person operating the VAR will too.
From the video footage that you have seen them using, are you capable of making better decisions than they are?
The problem is not the technology, the problem is the referee’s protectionist application of it. They’re more interested in supporting their mate on the field personally than professionally.
Interestingly, Pawson had the clearest view of the incident in real time. Probably would have given it if not for the VAR system
There’s no rhyme or reason to when VAR chooses to intervene is there?
It was a clear fk. I'm actually shocked he was even sent to the screen.They actively try and rule goals out it seems.
Kick ball out of hands? Nope?
Bit of a tug, yeah that'll do it.
Ronaldo has a good shout as well.Anyone got a video of the Sancho incident or the Wilson incident ?