cyberman
Full Member
- Joined
- May 26, 2010
- Messages
- 37,331
Ours was overturnedDid anyone see the one given against Dortmund? It was far worse. Our one was never being overturned.
Ours was overturnedDid anyone see the one given against Dortmund? It was far worse. Our one was never being overturned.
Nonsense posts like this is why we don’t get a decision anymore that’s even 70/30 in our favour.Were you complaining about the one given in the FA cup final?
In the modern era that's a penalty as enough distance and Eriksen dosen't have his hands by his side.
Thanks. Was that checked by var?
Because that is a penalty.
No way Davies gets a touch on the ball without going through Pellestri there. Surprised there has been zero to minimal discussion on major sports news about this.
Absolutely not surprising in the slightest.No way Davies gets a touch on the ball without going through Pellestri there. Surprised there has been zero to minimal discussion on major sports news about this.
No way Davies gets a touch on the ball without going through Pellestri there. Surprised there has been zero to minimal discussion on major sports news about this.
He might well have done but var don't know that. There wasn't enough time for them to make that determination which is the infuriating thing.I've watched it a few times and initially thought the same as you. But I think the defender amazingly gets a nick on the ball first.
He's touched the ball first. Whether he touches Pellestri at the same time then becomes irrelevant.
We should be more annoyed that Pellestri wasn't on his toes to make much more of a great chance.
I've watched it a few times and initially thought the same as you. But I think the defender amazingly gets a nick on the ball first.
But through the man first, was it not?
That’s so true. They are supposed to be reviewing everything but can’t have had time to look at that. The corner was taken almost immediately.He might well have done but var don't know that. There wasn't enough time for them to make that determination which is the infuriating thing.
No, same time.
I wondered how on earth he'd managed it, but he seemed to.
The camera went immediately to Davies' face and it was clear he knew he fouled Pellistri. Hopefully this VAR bullshit evens out soon.No way Davies gets a touch on the ball without going through Pellestri there. Surprised there has been zero to minimal discussion on major sports news about this.
Hopefully this VAR bullshit evens out soon.
The camera went immediately to Davies' face and it was clear he knew he fouled Pellistri.
Yes he nicked the ball but not in a controlled manner-dangerous play. Penalty.No way Davies gets a touch on the ball without going through Pellestri there. Surprised there has been zero to minimal discussion on major sports news about this.
Ours was overturned
It's anti United because an offside goal was ruled offside?Just end this league. This is pure anti ManUtd. Nothing else.
It's anti United because an offside goal was ruled offside?
Just end this league. This is pure anti ManUtd. Nothing else.
No it’s because these goals stand all the time.Please stop whining. Obvious offside, easy decision.
He doesn't need to touch it. He was interfering with play from an offside position.Did Hojlund touch it?
They don't and when one of them do it shouldn't. It's tiring to read complaints about the right decision being made.No it’s because these goals stand all the time.