Lailiani
(Sadly not) Banned
Could play the Scholes role.
No, he couldn't. He's at his best when he's played as a second striker. A pretty typical No 9,5.
Could play the Scholes role.
No, he couldn't. He's at his best when he's played as a second striker. A pretty typical No 9,5.
How's that a 9.5?
It's something between a striker and an offensive midfielder, "hängende Spitze". What's the right term in English?
A number 10? Generally a 9 is line leader. And a number 10 runs the show just behind the main striker. I guess Maradona was a classic number 10. He could play just behind the striker and in midfield.
Think he would be a fantastic pick-up for Milan. But he wouldn't worry me much if he joined one of our English rivals, I don't think he'd be able to hack it.
A number 10?
Can't play in a two-man midfield to save his life.Could play the Scholes role.
Technically, yes - a number 9,5 doesn't actually exist in football. But the number 10 doesn't distinguish between typical creative attacking midfielders like Diego and players like van der Vaart that act somewhere between the strikeforce and the attacking midfield. Diego is a number 10. According to you, van der Vaart is also a number 10. Yet they played in different roles.
Van Der Vaart is superb but he's got the big club syndrome i think. He didnt want to move to a big club so joined Hamburg, then after being the star man moaned about playing for a big club and buggered off to Madrid where he couldnt hack it.
He`d fit the Italian league better than the Premiership I think. Why, I don`t know.
I`ll muppet a bit though and say that if we were to get one of Madrid's Dutchmen, then I`d love it to be Arjen Robben. Yes he is an absolute cnut, and yes he is injured more than Owen Hargreaves. But when on form he is the best left winger around, and would fit United like a glove. He doesn`t do much defensively obviously, but with the hardworking right wingers we have at this squad I think he would be perfect.
He's not that player anymore. He's now Cristiano Ronaldo without the goals or assists.
He didn't moan about playing for a big club. He just wanted to move to Spain, because his mother is Spanish and his grandparents dreamt of him playing in Spain. He was happy enough to move to Valencia and it's only down to the fact Hamburg didn't want to let him go two years ago that he didn't join them.
He lacks a bit professionalism and ambition, apart from that he's a very decent player. Hamburg have spend much money in this transfer window, but I could still see him come back. His wife works in Germany and as she has breast cancer, he'll probably don't want to expect a move to a new city of her. A club that wants to get the best out of van der Vaart has to build the team around him. Hamburg are able to do that.
Real Madrid should let Van der Vaart go for free
Real Madrid has had a busy summer buying players. The Spanish club has spend more than 250 million euro on Kaká, Cristiano Ronaldo, Karim Benzema, Raúl Albiol, Xabi Alonso, Esteban Granero and Alvaro Alberloa.
Now Real needs to offload players, because it can only register 25 players for the domestic competitions. Last week Klaas-Jan Huntelaar was shipped to AC Milan. Rafael van der Vaart seems to be next. Coach Manuel Pellegrini has told the midfielder that he is no longer part of the squad and he won't be registered.
The Dutch international is planning to leave. 'It makes no sense staying here', he said after Pellegrini's message. With the World Cup coming up in the summer of 2010 the 26-year old wants to play on a regular basis.
'It's obvious that Real is not planning to let Van der Vaart play and does not want to make use of his services anymore. He even did not get a player's number for the new season. In such a case they should let him walk away for free', says FIFPro lawyer Wil van Megen. 'Apparently he's worth nothing to them, so why should they ask a transfer fee?'
Real Madrid signed Van der Vaart from Hamburger SV in August 2008 for a fee of 15 million euro. His contract runs until the summer of 2013. Van Megen continues: 'FIFA and the clubs always talk about players who should respect their contracts. But in this case Real is the one who is not respecting the contract. They have just written Van der Vaart off by refusing him to be a part of the team. In my opinion by acting in this way Real has lost the right to demand a transfer fee for this player.'
Why would they sell him for free when they could get a transfer fee for him?
Just because they have no practical use for him, it doesn't mean he has no value. There'll be a club somewhere willing to pay at least £10 million for a player of his quality.
I dont know anything about this player, so i dont know if he'd suit our team or not. We could probably get him for 10mill. Is he worth it? I've no idea!
I dont know anything about this player, so i dont know if he'd suit our team or not. We could probably get him for 10mill. Is he worth it? I've no idea!
Well if Real is in breach of contract then they would have no right to ask for a transfer fee...
Overrated player
How so? He might not be topclub material but as far as I know nobody said that he's in a bracket with the likes of Gerrard, etc.
Yet, he's a very good player and was truly brilliant for Hamburg - there's a reason why Valencia and Real Madrid bid for him.