Plus waning immunity has never been an argument against the annual flu shot.Sure, a possible scenario here is that we will indeed need boosters - as you say - for feck knows how long.
That's not an argument against getting your shots here and now, though - is it? I mean, nobody is saying that getting as many people as possible vaccinated - at this point in time - will solve the problem, definitely and for ever.
That isn't the premise. The question is whether refusing to take the shot - here and now - makes sense, logically, from an overall perspective.
Plus waning immunity has never been an argument against the annual flu shot.
That's pretty much the opposite of what's actually happened. https://www.gov.uk/government/news/...ve-against-hospitalisation-from-delta-variantThe thing is there is more evidence coming out that the vaccines are not as effective against delta as first thought, sky news did a piece on this recently. You will never get everyone to take vaccines for whatever reason. The problem is, people are falling for the media nonsense that you are a massive threat if you don't take vaccines when the truth is, you can still get covid and pass it on when vaccinated. Why does someone who's been vaccinated and gets covid is less dangerous than someone unvaccinated who has already had covid and has natural immunity? You would condemn the unvaccinated person and deny them rights, yet the vaccinated infected person gets to do as they please!
We need to stop this deliberately divisive attitude that anyone who doesn't get vaccinated is a threat. They aren't and this kind of attitude needs to be challenged. All it will do is make people more divided and we have to accept that we will be living with covid for the rest of our lives as it'll be too expensive to keep vaccinated billions each year. The vulnerable will be the only ones vaccinated in future.
That's a sweeping generalisation based on your sample of seven.It wouldn't surprise me if a large majority of black players haven't taken up the vaccinations.
A lot of people I know and have worked with recently who are black, refuse to take the jab.
Other day I was working with a group of 7 and only one person outside myself had had 1 jab only.
That's a sweeping generalisation based on your sample of seven.
My mistake, you've clearly undertaken a detailed analysis of vaccine take-up among different ethnic groupings, of which your anecdote about some black colleagues was merely a footnote.No.
I said that I know lots of people who haven't had it.
I used an example of the people I was with the other day as a basis of only 1 in 7 had taken up the jab.
My mistake, you've clearly undertaken a detailed analysis of vaccine take-up among different ethnic groupings, of which your anecdote about some black colleagues was merely a footnote.
As an obvious man of science with an unswerving dedication to thorough research, you weren't just spouting a lazy stereotype.
If only our authorities shared your zeal we'd beat this bug in no time!
It's just ridiculous that something that has scientific proof and has been proved worked for a long long time, to be dismissed like this. I found it amusing when anybody said "I don't believe in covid". This isn't a religion FFSThe same way why people think there are hidden triangles in shows and music videos that silently puts illuminati message inside your head. Or the same way people think bigfoot exists but the footage of it always looks blurry and yet despite of it the footages were deemed to be "proofs" of its existence. Some people love that kind of stuff, when they are able to believe things that they think most people dont know about.
True. But at least flat earthers don't put anybody in immediate dangerApparently, flat-earthers are on the increase too.
The real question, is why is this the case?
In the US it has deep historical roots, including one of the worst things my government has ever done: Tuskegee Syphilis Study - WikipediaI'm sorry but the uptake within BAME groups has been reported as fact as being low, especially in certain areas.
It isn't difficult to read the study's and reports which are freely available.
The real question, is why is this the case?
There's a large role for a long history of systemic racism and other issues leading to mistrust of anything official, and especially state institutions and recommendations.I'm sorry but the uptake within BAME groups has been reported as fact as being low, especially in certain areas.
It isn't difficult to read the study's and reports which are freely available.
The real question, is why is this the case?
I'm sorry but the uptake within BAME groups has been reported as fact as being low, especially in certain areas.
It isn't difficult to read the study's and reports which are freely available.
The real question, is why is this the case?
Interesting thing is, delta (and any other newer variants) probably don't even spread if vaccination happened at a greater pace with more coverage.The thing is there is more evidence coming out that the vaccines are not as effective against delta as first thought, sky news did a piece on this recently
Yes you do. If someone else thinks it's right for them to smoke in a bar, they can be told due to legislation that they're wrong and should get rid of the cigarette or leave. You also can't drink & drive, no matter what you think.Nobody is arguing against vaccines themselves, the problem is, people thinking it's right to criticise people who don't take them. You have no right to say what another person thinks is right for them.
I'm not sure what you were trying to say here, but this reads like an argument for a continuous vaccination campaign. That's probably correct. In the future, this will probably be like the flu shot, which you get in autumn to get you safely through the usual outbreak season.Also, immunity will be lost over time and it will vary from person to person anyway. It's not as straightforward as saying person a is less likely to spread it as person b who've had the jabs but their body doesn't generate the same levels of antibodies and therefore one could spread the virus as much as an unvaccinated person. The population at large is at various stages of their jabbed status. Plenty of the first jabbed group now need boosters, proving this theory.
You might want to start checking real science, then. There is a lot of knowledge about infectivity, and how that differs from one variant to another. Also, I'm not sure what marketing campaign you are talking about, as much of the data and research comes from sources unrelated to the vaccine companies. Finally, what trial do you mean, and how does that relate to the subject at hand?There is no science to prove the level of spread from person to person anyway. People act like science is precise and that there is no marketing involved in making these vaccines. They will make all sorts of claims and people lap it up as gospel. This is still very much a huge trial and to make certain claims is just as irresponsible as some anti vaxxers who claim hospital figures show many vaccinated people admitted.
I don’t know why in particular this thread has brought them out when we have 2 covid threads going for more than a yearBest solution is to put additional movement restrictions for unvaccinated footballers. Its only fair for them being put at greater risk compared to vaccinated footballers. Also this thread is full of anti-vaxxers which is shocking to me.
Have to call out this racial stereotyping for what it is. Not acceptable here or anywhere.
“Certain areas” - what the hell does that mean?
As an employer, a 'no jab, no job' policy does indeed open you to potential discrimination claims on the basis of disability, or religious/philosophical belief.
You do have to be very careful.
Considering Lingards home commitments I’d be surprised if he’s not vaccinated
Ok, I read some of this dipshits shit. He is claiming that there is a risk of DNA alteration due to transposon mediated insertion. Bullshit. Is there in infinitesimal chance that every circumstance could magically align for a single cell in your body to have an insertion event? Sure, but there is also an infinitesimal chance I could wake up tomorrow looking like (not fat)Ronaldo and married to Scarlett Johansson. Don't believe me. have a read:
Host-Virus Chimeric Events in SARS-CoV-2-Infected Cells Are Infrequent and Artifactual | Journal of Virology (asm.org)
The fact that something can happen, and the reality of if having a realistic chance of happening are 2 different things. mRNA vaccines are a miracle of modern science and are going to revolutionize our fight against infectious disease. We should be excited about the future of this technology.
Lots of football posters appear to never read or get involved in the non-football discussions; and certainly newbie posters can't go there.I don’t know why in particular this thread has brought them out when we have 2 covid threads going for more than a year
Having the vaccine doesn't stop you catching Covid, it just reduces the risk of serious illness and death. Technically you can also pass it to others also.
It's not stereotyping.
True. Broadly the least deprived areas of the UK have the highest vaccine uptake (95%+ in the over 50s) and the most deprived the lowest (87%)You used the term "BAME groups" - which refers to ethnicity (in the UK).
Ethnicity has feck all to do with it.
Are certain statistical/demographic categories (defined however you like - but never based on ethnicity) more or less likely to take the vaccine? Undoubtedly - and that should not be dismissed. But bringing broad, generic and pointless terms like "BAME" into it serves no purpose.
Oh yeah I know that, I’m just saying before he gets labelled as an anti vaxxer or somethingHaving the vaccine doesn't stop you catching Covid, it just reduces the risk of serious illness and death. Technically you can also pass it to others also.
True. But at least flat earthers don't put anybody in immediate danger
Late to comment and you might have had a response to this already but...yes vaccinations put selective pressure on the virus which is why a rapid, complete vaccination effort is an absolute must. The longer that people take to get vaccinated to more time the virus has to adapt to selective pressure. There is literal physical proof of this working on the arms of pretty much anyone over 60. We globally eradicated smallpox. Sad to say that if we tried that now it would fail due to this kind of mindset.
absolutely not true. Immunocompromised individuals, people on immunosuppressive medication, and others with various diseases are unable to get vaccinated. These individuals absolutely count on the rest of us to be responsible by getting vaccinated. Also, vaccinations reduce the window in which, and the frequency by which, a person can infect others. It is by reducing these windows, combined with the personal protection provided, that allow vaccines to end disease.
addressed above and such a horrific take I struggle to not scream
I’m done. We are all fecked.
Well that’s a lie, 40% of covid patients in hospital are jabbed!
Thats probably very true, also most of UK got Astra Zeneca and thats going pretty good so far for the population.Fair enough. I remember arguing the toss with @Wibble about this. That is technically true for the AZ vaccine, even though it wouldn’t be categorised as a “DNA vaccine”.
It’s still a nonsense argument as viruses do to us exactly what the vaccine does all the time. Using this logic every time you get a common cold you should panic about your “genome being altered”. But you don’t. Because it isn’t.
Ok, I read some of this dipshits shit. He is claiming that there is a risk of DNA alteration due to transposon mediated insertion. Bullshit. Is there in infinitesimal chance that every circumstance could magically align for a single cell in your body to have an insertion event? Sure, but there is also an infinitesimal chance I could wake up tomorrow looking like (not fat)Ronaldo and married to Scarlett Johansson. Don't believe me. have a read:
Host-Virus Chimeric Events in SARS-CoV-2-Infected Cells Are Infrequent and Artifactual | Journal of Virology (asm.org)
The fact that something can happen, and the reality of if having a realistic chance of happening are 2 different things. mRNA vaccines are a miracle of modern science and are going to revolutionize our fight against infectious disease. We should be excited about the future of this technology.
I'm posting this just so someone has said that there is zero evidence that vaccines lead to Long Covid.
Here is a pro tip. Most well written articles have two places you can go to get a good review of what the paper is trying to convey: The abstract and the last paragraph of the discussion.Host-Virus Chimeric Events in SARS-CoV-2-Infected Cells Are Infrequent and Artifactual | Journal of Virology (asm.org)
I couldn't find a single sentence that I understood. I knew I was dim, but that was just embarrassing.
Collectively, our data analyses and experimental findings indicate that currently observed and widely reported HVC events are infrequent, not reproducible, and likely to be artifacts of reverse transcription during RNA-seq library preparation.
Unless they are map makers or navigators.It's just ridiculous that something that has scientific proof and has been proved worked for a long long time, to be dismissed like this. I found it amusing when anybody said "I don't believe in covid". This isn't a religion FFS
True. But at least flat earthers don't put anybody in immediate danger
Well according to some of my friends, they were my school friends and I'm not proud to know them as friends. They don't believe the vaccine because they believe in something else. They believe that this is just a huge scheme designed to make the rich like Bill Gates to be richer and vaccine is the way to transport money from people, industries and governments to a few ultra rich people to make them richer. Again, Bill Gates included.It's just ridiculous that something that has scientific proof and has been proved worked for a long long time, to be dismissed like this. I found it amusing when anybody said "I don't believe in covid". This isn't a religion FFS
True. But at least flat earthers don't put anybody in immediate danger
Yes. Not every vaccine is perfectly sterilising. In fact the majority are not. The covid vaccines prevent severe disease and reduce the chances of being infected and onward transmission. They’re excellent vaccines and key to getting back to normal. I hope United mandate the vaccine or at least strongly encourage the players to get it. Massively reduces the chance of any of them having their fitness suffer due to catching the actually virus.Is that the new bar for "effective"?
Medical exemption is a thing and anyone who can't have it would be able to get a doctor to write something to that effect. As for religion, I'm not aware that any of the world's major religions are anti-vaccination. There is no non-medical reason other than "I don't want to have it", which isn't good enough.As an employer, a 'no jab, no job' policy does indeed open you to potential discrimination claims on the basis of disability, or religious/philosophical belief.
You do have to be very careful.