What do you reckon the total cost was a semester?Those 300 bucks are just administrative fees and transport though. Books, rent, food, etc comes on top of that.
What do you reckon the total cost was a semester?Those 300 bucks are just administrative fees and transport though. Books, rent, food, etc comes on top of that.
What do you reckon the total cost was a semester?
You didn’t even back up your assertion about paying off $37k with $50k. Show me the payment plans. Factor in interests. Account for life events. Increasing cost of living. You’re the one making the claim so go on and prove it. Mr “platform to spout your absurd views”. And your reading comprehension does suck. You’ve put words into my mouth on at least five occasions. There’s some stats for you.Well I see your frustration is creeping in becuase you cant fight statistics. Still waiting for a statistically backed reply to how you cant pay of 38k with a 50k starting salary. Take your time I'm waiting. I cant debate this with you any further till you speak with supporting numbers and not "your reading comprehension sucks".
It made a reference to lazy rivers and I thought it was for sure referring to my alma mater (UCF) because they are building one.Resident yanks...what are your thoughts on this article? -
https://www.theatlantic.com/education/archive/2018/09/why-is-college-so-expensive-in-america/569884/
No meaningful data exist on the quality of universities globally.
Man don’t even get me started on those. You literally can’t do some courses because it requires a payment gateway for textbooks despite the sheer amount of research you can do outside the textbook. They’re like paid for mobile games but with more steps.My textbooks were more than that.
Man don’t even get me started on those. You literally can’t do some courses because it requires a payment gateway for textbooks despite the sheer amount of research you can do outside the textbook. They’re like paid for mobile games but with more steps.
Man don’t even get me started on those. You literally can’t do some courses because it requires a payment gateway for textbooks despite the sheer amount of research you can do outside the textbook. They’re like paid for mobile games but with more steps.
Then you go to sell back a book you paid $150 for and they give you $5, then turn around and sell it again for $80.Disgusting how much of a racket there is in textbooks. Professors are complicit too. Made me so angry when I was at college.
@shamans has it figured out, obviously.I always wonder how the average American can handle paying off student loan while trying to build a career and start a family here.
Here in Italy, you pay between 150-3,000 euros, depending on your family's income. And on top of that, pretty much everyone is eligible for scholarships that are worth up to 4,000 euros.Coming from Germany these numbers sound absolutely insane. I think for most universities you pay about €300 per semester and about half of that is so you get free public transfer in your federal state.
Disgusting how much of a racket there is in textbooks. Professors are complicit too. Made me so angry when I was at college.
My experience, it’s more typical that professors do what you said. But I’ve had courses that absolutely requires brand new book purchases for their online access code for the asinine modules you’re supposed to do.So that's a thing, too? As far as I know (and I haven't heard anything to the contrary) over here lecturers go through their script (ppt) and upload the slides to the university network, for students to download (free) them. These lectures can be based on books which sometimes are written by the lecturer themselves, but since "if it wasn't covered during the lecture I won't ask you about it during exams" seems to be a golden rule you can still decide for yourself which books you actually want/need to buy and where the script/library are enough to get you through.
Since I've learned in another thread that stuff like youth football(soccer) is a massive racket as well: is life really that bleak, being priced out of sports and education, for kids/young adults from a poor background?
anyway, prosecutors are rats
Surely that should be illegal?Man don’t even get me started on those. You literally can’t do some courses because it requires a payment gateway for textbooks despite the sheer amount of research you can do outside the textbook. They’re like paid for mobile games but with more steps.
If you're required to quote from the textbook in the rubric for the assignments, then you've gotta have it.Surely that should be illegal?
Around here if you pass the exams and do the mandatory coursework then it doesn't matter what textbooks you use or if you don't use them at all. That is the only sensible way.
Many exploitive practices here should be illegal but we’re dealing with populations that prioritize things like guns, abortion, and their own well being (ie: I have a good job and the economy is doing “well” so why should I care?). More people need to get informed, get active, and participate in reforming the lawmakers and laws.Surely that should be illegal?
Around here if you pass the exams and do the mandatory coursework then it doesn't matter what textbooks you use or if you don't use them at all. That is the only sensible way.
Just as futile as going against a Sicilian when death is on the line. Everyone knows that.https://www.washingtonpost.com/grap...apers/afghanistan-war-confidential-documents/
Bombshell. Not.
How the feck anyone, with a minimum knowledge of history, thought they could win a war in Afghanistan is beyond me.
Inhale this, but do not touchJust as futile as going against a Sicilian when death is on the line. Everyone knows that.
Just two days after a Houston police sergeant was fatally shot in the line of duty while responding to a domestic violence call, Chief Art Acevedo is once again challenging lawmakers to pass key legislation that would bar abusers from owning a firearm.
“I don’t want to hear about how much they support law enforcement,” Acevedo told reporters Monday morning outside the medical examiner’s office before police escorted Sgt. Christopher Brewster’s body. “I don’t want to hear about how much they care about the sanctity of lives,” Acevedo said.
He said legislators have failed to reauthorize the Violence Against Women Act, which provides funding and grants for domestic abuse programs, due to pressure from the National Rifle Association, which “doesn’t like the fact that we want to take firearms out of the hands of boyfriends that abuse girlfriends.”
“And who killed our sergeant? A boyfriend abusing his girlfriend,” Acevedo said. “So you’re either here for women and children and our daughters and our sisters and our aunts or you’re here for the NRA.”
“Make up your minds,” he added.
Acevedo called out by name Sens. Mitch McConnell, Ted Cruz and John Cornyn; the latter of which Acevedo jousted with last week on Twitter after a press conference about the Violence Against Women Act.
You could win a limited conflict, with limited goals. The country would probably be a total shitshow after, but you could call it a 'win' if you set the goals low enough and just stuck to them. But what the papers reveal is the lack of a realistic strategy at any point, and really a lack of understanding of the country.https://www.washingtonpost.com/grap...apers/afghanistan-war-confidential-documents/
Bombshell. Not.
How the feck anyone, with a minimum knowledge of history, thought they could win a war in Afghanistan is beyond me.
Pelosi Admits She KNEW Bush Was Lying About Iraq
Establishment ladies and gentlemen. Wonder if she prays for the dead.
It's difficult to judge. Criticism of Israel has been successfully miscontrued as antisemitism.Is there an actual serious antisemitism problem at US campuses or is this political lobbyism?
Is there an actual serious antisemitism problem at US campuses or is this political lobbyism?
It's primarily from far right and Trump supporters. Look who shot the synagogue in Pittsburgh.Is there an actual serious antisemitism problem at US campuses or is this political lobbyism?
Erm....
The term "antisemitism" has never been a neutral term for hostility towards "Semites" (a nonsensical category in itself). For all I know, it originated as a positive self-designation of German anti-Jewish zealots in the 19th century. So it has always been a term exclusively about hostility towards Jews (meant either positively or critically), and that's really the only context in which it makes sense to use it.It's primarily from far right and Trump supporters. Look who shot the synagogue in Pittsburgh.
Boycotting Israel is a whole different matter and only the mentally limited will conflate it with "antisemitism". In fact, semites aren't even limited to Jewish people so anyone making it purely about Jewish is probably mentally limited too.
But Nazis are mentally limited so my point still stands.The term "antisemitism" has never been a neutral term for hostility towards "Semites" (a nonsensical category in itself). For all I know, it originated as a positive self-designation of German anti-Jewish zealots in the 19th century. So it has always been a term exclusively about hostility towards Jews (meant either positively or critically), and that's really the only context in which it makes sense to use it.
Being unaware of the term's history is one thing, but calling those who use it correctly "probably mentally limited" on that basis doesn't look good.
Hm, you said "anyone making it [antisemitism] purely about Jewish is probably mentally limited", because "semites aren't even limited to Jewish people". Which sounds like a whole different point to me, as "anyone" practically means everyone today, not just Nazis (who mostly aren't using the term in its old meaning anymore since the exposure of the Holocaust).But Nazis are mentally limited so my point still stands.
Even in my backwards third world country no one argues teachers shouldn't be paid more.