I'd hope this isn't an 'unpopular' opinion.RVP, and even more so Falcao due to his knee, are both past their best. We should be playing Rooney up front consistently and bring in a new young striker this upcoming summer.
Having Rooney, Wilson, and a new other striker is the best way to go, in my opinion.
I'd disagree, I'd say Falcao has still got it.I'd hope this isn't an 'unpopular' opinion.
Yeah I think he's better by some distance. He will be very good once he improves decision making.Coutinho has far more ability than Mata, apart from his goalscoring and shots, he is better than Mata in every other aspect imo. He's more creative, faster, better dribbling, can beat defenders, is explosive, has balance and more flair.
Matic and Schneiderlin are upper average centre midfielders, who's reputations are built on hard work not quality.
Valdes is a better shot stopper than De Gea.
Aguero is an average finisher but truly world class at getting into those positions.
Agree with the first and last point, but think you're pretty far off the mark with Valdes.Matic and Schneiderlin are upper average centre midfielders, who's reputations are built on hard work not quality.
Valdes is a better shot stopper than De Gea.
Aguero is an average finisher but truly world class at getting into those positions.
Matic and Schneiderlin are upper average centre midfielders, who's reputations are built on hard work not quality.
Valdes is a better shot stopper than De Gea.
Aguero is an average finisher but truly world class at getting into those positions.
Coutinho has far more ability than Mata, apart from his goalscoring and shots, he is better than Mata in every other aspect imo. He's more creative, faster, better dribbling, can beat defenders, is explosive, has balance and more flair.
Coutinho has far more ability than Mata, apart from his goalscoring and shots, he is better than Mata in every other aspect imo. He's more creative, faster, better dribbling, can beat defenders, is explosive, has balance and more flair.
Coutinho has far more ability than Mata, apart from his goalscoring and shots, he is better than Mata in every other aspect imo. He's more creative, faster, better dribbling, can beat defenders, is explosive, has balance and more flair.
Coutinho has far more ability than Mata, apart from his goalscoring and shots, he is better than Mata in every other aspect imo. He's more creative, faster, better dribbling, can beat defenders, is explosive, has balance and more flair.
352 is a good formation for our team and will eventually work when the players get used to it.
Why wouldn't they be legends? Because they had short stints at City?I wouldn't say unpopular opinion, but I often want to raise the question.. Why are Schmeichel and Law legends? My Liverpool supporting mates always say it to me, all I can say is because they achieved so much at United, but I do wonder myself sometimes. I consider them to be legends because I've grown up with then having that status but I wonder how other United fans justify it.
Well why would they do it? After what they did at United, why join City? I don't get it. Just avoid a club or two, that's all they had to do. It amazes me why anyone who has great success at a certain club would join their rivals. Of all the clubs they could go on to join.Why wouldn't they be legends? Because they had short stints at City?
We're the second biggest club in the world at best.
Not really controversial. I would imagine most people consider Madrid the biggest.
For Law 46 goals in a single season, 11 years at Old Trafford, Ballon d'Or winner, walking off when he scored for City in 73, Ambassador of the club, pretty easy to see why.I wouldn't say unpopular opinion, but I often want to raise the question.. Why are Schmeichel and Law legends? My Liverpool supporting mates always say it to me, all I can say is because they achieved so much at United, but I do wonder myself sometimes. I consider them to be legends because I've grown up with then having that status but I wonder how other United fans justify it.
Say that to any of the United fans in my family.
But, if I have to meet some kind of standard of unpopularity here, how about I say that we're second and City is first cos they won the PL last year.
I'd say you and your family are dumb and we're probably 2-3rd behind the Spaniards, but nobody over the age of 1 should actually care.
I'd say you and your family are dumb
we're probably 2-3rd behind the Spaniards,
but nobody over the age of 1 should actually care.
City obviously aren't the bigger club. However you measure that silliness it's just not rightTo be fair, United are comfortably bigger in English speaking countries, and Madrid in hispanic and spanish speaking countries.
Well just let me run along and inform them.
Which is basically what I said.
Well then half this forum and a large part of the wider footballing world are under the age of 1.
Any more pieces of wisdom you want to throw my way?
Yeah city aren't a bigger club and you don't need to split nonsense up into 3 pieces.
City obviously aren't the bigger club. However you measure that silliness it's just not right
I wasn't referring to City, but Madrid.
More talented? Maybe. Mata is the better player by some distance though.