JonDahl
Full Member
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2009
- Messages
- 6,700
Rooney's best position hasn't been "off the front" since about 2007 and playing him there has been detrimental to the team. He should either be upfront on his own or doing a job out wide.
It could partly be down to not having seen all of the ones you mention consistently as kids. I'd say my watching of teams week in week out is mostly restricted to he premier league.Well that makes me curious. You honestly think Shaw's performances for Southampton were better than for example Ramos was for Sevilla, or Varane or Alaba when they were Shaws age/teenagers?
I obviously disagree, but I've only seen Shaw for what, 15 full matches I think (and a lot of highlights and snippets), so like I said, that makes me curious (not sarcastic). Could you perhaps explain why you feel he is the best teenage defender you've ever seen?
januzaj should be loaned to a premier league club- im sure everton would suit him. like sterling he needs to start games regularly to get better at his trade. if we arent going to start januzaj regularly then its a waste of his talents.this is the unpopular opinions thread.
Thats a bit better yea mate.januzaj should be loaned to a premier league club- im sure everton would suit him. like sterling he needs to start games regularly to get better at his trade. if we arent going to start januzaj regularly then its a waste of his talents.
next summer we should buy barkley and ship out mata for pogba.
only reason we should bring back ronaldo is to be an ambassador for the club (in the future) not as a player...unpopular enough?
This. Luke Shaw will be fantastic for usYou're only saying that because he's started his career here injured, which is a bit frustrating. I think he'll be excellent in the second half of the season at LB.
Perhaps that's true because the market is fecked up nowadays. The moment PSG will pay 100 million pounds for, a talent like, say, Adnan, and that becomes the 'norm', the Shaw deal would look much better. Same goes for inflation.
Illarramendi is interesting, I found on his wikipedia that he cost 32.2 million Euro, making it 25 million Pounds. I think we paid more than 25 million Pounds for Shaw, so then it wouldn't be true that we paid a similar fee for Shaw as Real did for Illaramendi. Also, midfielders are generally more expensive than left backs.
On the other hand, I think Shaw has more potential as a left back than Illaramendi has as a midfielder and he showed that potential at a younger age, so if you disregard the fact that midfielders are generally more expensive than left backs and assume that they were equally expensive (which doesn't seem to be the case, but I could be wrong because valuta/pound to Euro;s can be confusing), Real Madrids signing of Illa might be even more laughable than the Shaw signing. But that's a lot of if's and maybe's.
Mata's been very productive though.The same excuses we gave for Kagawa are now being recycled and used on Mata.
He has stats in his favour, which is a bit ironic, as people purposely deny Rooney when stats are used to defend him. Seeing as I am in the unpopular opinions thread... Mata is a hinderance due to his lack of pace and inflexibility. I'd sell him and revert to a dynamic 4-3-3 with two energetic box-to-box midfielders in front of a #6 (Blind).The same excuses we gave for Kagawa are now being recycled and used on Mata.
According to various reports we paid £27-28m for shaw, so £25m and £28m are similar fees no?
Fair point midfielders usually cost more than full backs but the majority of premier league clubs are loaded compared to mid-table spanish clubs so obviously Southampton were going to hold out for a huge fee for a talent like Shaw.
This. Luke Shaw will be fantastic for us
From what I've found, various newspapers like the guardian reported a 30-32 million pound fee including appearance tax/add ons.
No doubt he's a good and talented player and I'm pretty sure that he will do well for us. But he's not even fully grown physically, yet his position demands a very high level of fitness (according to Van Gaal the fullbacks had to be the most fit players for Holland at the World Cup). Some players, like Alaba, seem super fit and physically ready to play 40+ matches a season while being young.
But if you look at our young and talented defenders and the intensity of the league we play in, how much can you expect from a 19 year old? Looking at young and talented defenders like Rafael and Phil Jones, they've struggled with injuries a lot. Let's just hope Shaw doesn't have the same problems, but his age and recent injury suggest otherwise. This was a concern I posted about before we signed Shaw by the way.
So the way I see it, we payed 30+ million pounds for a player off who I'm not sure he has a higher 'ceiling' in terms of ability than say Ricardo Rodriguez, who did an excellent job for Wolfsburg and Switserland, or Fabio Coentrao who's been very decent at times for Benfica and Madrid. Both were realistic options for us, cheaper than Shaw I assume. Older but not too old, meaning more experienced and more likely to be physically ready.
I just don't see the upside in signing Shaw compared to those guys I mentioned, or other talented left backs in the 21 or 22 + years of age category, except for the fact that he's British. He could possibly turn out to become a better player than Rodriguez or Coentrao, but those two could also turn out to be better players than Shaw in the next five years. Same goes for Shaw being our left back for 30+ matches next 5 seasons, that's possible. But injuries and having to adapt to playing at one of the best clubs in the world, can also have him following the same scenario as Rafael underwent, making the 30+ million a ridiculous amount of money.
But maybe I should've posted this in the Shaw thread.
United fans should stop with this whole excuse for every one of our own players playing average for reasons to do with the players around them. With players playing well in lesser teams its always "its not hard to shine there" but with our own its "well course our strikers are playing shit the delivery is woeful".."course the defence is crap look whats infront of them"..."kagawa needs this and that to (oh no he's been sold)"...."Mata needs to play Central otherwise he's obviously going to have zero impact"....Its beyond a joke. How about they stand up and be counted and play head and shoulders above those around them as there fee's and ability dictate they should!!
United fans should stop with this whole excuse for every one of our own players playing average for reasons to do with the players around them. With players playing well in lesser teams its always "its not hard to shine there" but with our own its "well course our strikers are playing shit the delivery is woeful".."course the defence is crap look whats infront of them"..."kagawa needs this and that to (oh no he's been sold)"...."Mata needs to play Central otherwise he's obviously going to have zero impact"....Its beyond a joke. How about they stand up and be counted and play head and shoulders above those around them as there fee's and ability dictate they should!!
Glad you bolded the word opinion, we may have mistaken it as a fact, considering how likely it is to be true.Here we go then...let's test this very unpopular opinion of mine
Januzaj will be nothing more than a mediocre player and not the world beater many expect him to become.
He will be sold within a year or two.
Here we go then...let's test this very unpopular opinion of mine
Januzaj will be nothing more than a mediocre player and not the world beater many expect him to become.
He will be sold within a year or two.
Here we go then...let's test this very unpopular opinion of mine
Januzaj will be nothing more than a mediocre player and not the world beater many expect him to become.
He will be sold within a year or two.
Mata's been very productive though.
Here's a Unpopular Opinion these days -
Our squad is more than good enough to finish top 4 comparing with Rivals. And if we don't i think LVG would have failed this season just like Moyes did last even more so having spent the money he did.
Was thinking and our third/4th choice AM who we sold as deadwood is gonna be a starter for Dortmund probably who should be challenging for the Bundesliga and are a team which most right now would think would spank us if were to face them.
Our 5th choice striker is gonna be 2nd choice striker at the European champions atleast.
Our 4th choice striker who we sold is gonna be a starter probably for one of the rivals for top 4.
Even the much rubbished Cleverley (Our 5th choice CM) was wanted by several clubs including Everton, Valencia.
Quite confident our 3rd/4th choice CB in Smalling would have been starting for Arsenal in little time as well if we did that weird swap for Vermaelen.
The point is we had many good and very good players last season and have spent huge money on top of that even upgrading. Now need the manager to settle the team, improve players an get them performing to their capabilities. (See Simeone at Atletico and Rodgers at Liverpool and they didn't even spunk so much money and went higher.)
You know if Adnan doesn't go on to become at least a player of Ozils level I will have absolutely no eye for talent in football.
Either you seriously underrate Ozil or seriously overrate Januzaj's potential.
For you, I'm over-rating Januzaj because I think he can go much further than Ozils level. I can't name many young players I've seen at United better than him at his age apart from Rooney or Ronaldo.
Much further than Ozil? I see it's a case of you seriously under rating Ozil then.
So he'll regress? Because he is already better than mediocre.Here we go then...let's test this very unpopular opinion of mine
Januzaj will be nothing more than a mediocre player and not the world beater many expect him to become.
He will be sold within a year or two.
Here we go then...let's test this very unpopular opinion of mine
Januzaj will be nothing more than a mediocre player and not the world beater many expect him to become.
He will be sold within a year or two.
From what I've found, various newspapers like the guardian reported a 30-32 million pound fee including appearance tax/add ons.