Suedesi, shut the feck up.
Originally posted by Dans:
<strong>
If we go three at the back we'll lose it. Bad idea Arnold.</strong><hr></blockquote>
I've only ever known us dominate a game when we go 3 at the back.
We flood midfield and create plenty of problems up front.
Daniel.
Originally posted by arnie sidebottom:
<strong>
I've only ever known us dominate a game when we go 3 at the back.
We flood midfield and create plenty of problems up front.
Daniel.
</strong><hr></blockquote>
Isn't the midfield already flooded Mr Sidebottom?
Originally Posted by Livvie 20:
Well don't get too excited. Ole's record as sub is not as good as everyone thinks, as I might have mentioned a few times. <hr></blockquote>
I know, but I'd still like to see us playing two up front.
Originally posted by Dans:
<strong>
Isn't the midfield already flooded Mr Sidebottom?</strong><hr></blockquote>
But it seems their guys who are dominating !
Originally posted by arnie sidebottom:
<strong>
But it seems their guys who are dominating !</strong><hr></blockquote>
Phil and Veron won't dominate against anyone's midfield.
Originally posted by Donaldinho:
<strong>Why don't we just try...............Now, hold you breath people! This may seem a little radical to say the least....But........Just hear me out!
4 - 4 - 2?????</strong><hr></blockquote>
like we used in the Villa match with the very same end product, its not the formation,,, something else,,
<img src="confused.gif" border="0">
Originally posted by Livvie20:
<strong>
Well don't get too excited. Ole's record as sub is not as good as everyone thinks, as I might have mentioned a few times.</strong><hr></blockquote>
<img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laugh Out Loud]" />
Originally posted by stoned.rose:
<strong>EVERYBODY SHUT THE feck UP.
</strong><hr></blockquote>
Thought you were in the Royal Oak ?
Originally posted by arnie sidebottom:
<strong>
But it seems their guys who are dominating !</strong><hr></blockquote>
So run that Ole idea by me again....
Originally posted by arnie sidebottom:
<strong>Streaker on the pitch at Anfield.</strong><hr></blockquote>
Ha ha
someone stole a hammers fans clothes
<img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laugh Out Loud]" /> <img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laugh Out Loud]" /> <img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laugh Out Loud]" />
Originally posted by Neil Thomson:
<strong>Suedesi, shut the feck up.</strong><hr></blockquote>
Neil,
This is a game thread.
Donaldinho oughtta leave the moaning after the game.
Originally posted by arnie sidebottom:
<strong>Massives 2-1 up (Goater).
Shut the feck up Dans </strong><hr></blockquote>
So how's the flooding going Arnold?
Originally posted by Dans:
<strong>or 3 at the back? 4-4-2 is what Michael and his co commentator are saying.</strong><hr></blockquote>
Jimmy Armfield says 4-4-2, so that's good enough for me.
Originally posted by Murt:
<strong>
like we used in the Villa match with the very same end product, its not the formation,,, something else,,
</strong><hr></blockquote>
I disagree.
The 4-5-1 encourages Giggs and Beckham to come inside too much. We have no width and only one striker to chase around like a headless chicken.
There's no discipline. If Giggs and Beckham stuck to what they do best, there might be more chances for the front one/two.
Why do you think Cole and Yorke were so successful?? They were playing behind a perfectly disciplined midfield who kept it tight in the centre, and used the flanks.
Originally posted by Dans:
<strong>
So how's the flooding going Arnold? </strong><hr></blockquote>
My f******g fence is still down. Don't start on me sunshine...
Originally posted by Suedesi:
<strong>
Neil,
This is a game thread.
Donaldinho oughtta leave the moaning after the game.</strong><hr></blockquote>
Well it's hardly moaning When the majority of the people actually agree with your opinion, now is it? I call it, ingredients for debate! But have it, how you will!
Originally posted by Livvie20:
<strong>only one striker to chase around like a headless chicken.</strong><hr></blockquote>
Think about that for a minute. It's making me laugh. Depends on your imagination I guess.
Originally posted by arnie sidebottom:
<strong>
Thought you were in the Royal Oak ?</strong><hr></blockquote>
We've got the net in the pub up here.
Originally posted by Kev:
<strong>Anyone know where I can listen to the match? </strong><hr></blockquote>
Radio
Originally posted by Livvie20:
<strong>An idiot on the field..........that'll be t'other half no doubt.</strong><hr></blockquote>
<img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laugh Out Loud]" />