Post the pictures here, thank you!
United Kits 2024/25
- Thread starter Jericholyte2
- Start date
Post the pictures here, thank you!
I can’t unfortunately due to my newbie status!
I've found one and see what they mean. Looks even worse. All I can imagine is that Team Viewer realised they don't have to abide by sponsors logo size rules for friendlies and asked for it to be bigger.
I've found one and see what they mean. Looks even worse. All I can imagine is that Team Viewer realised they don't have to abide by sponsors logo size rules for friendlies and asked for it to be bigger.
Thanks guys, yes, thats horrible and extreme greed by Team Viewer. Club should put a stop to this nonsense!
Why not have the front empty but the team viewer logo for the friendlies then, thats what they desire for!
Kids these days smdh my head.
In all seriousness while I hated the away kit originally I've warmed to it in general. It's not really to my taste but not everything has to be for me, and other seem to like it. It doesn't look embarrassing on the pitch anyway.
Definitely getting the home and third shirts this year though, glorious.
On the even of my 33rd birthday, thank you for this.
I thought Team Viewer were cancelling the contract? Do they even have the right to dictate this?
I hated the away kit first time I saw it.
Then I saw Onana look like an absolute Don in the tracksuit version of it, and now I think it's the most stylish thing that's ever been created.
However I can't imagine I'll look anywhere near as cool as Onana if I ever wear it
Then I saw Onana look like an absolute Don in the tracksuit version of it, and now I think it's the most stylish thing that's ever been created.
However I can't imagine I'll look anywhere near as cool as Onana if I ever wear it
If the team viewer logo was a bit smaller, it would be amazing.
Personally think it's a great away kit, very fashionable. Small touches like having the United logo in white adds to the appeal.
It's much better than Arsenal away kit which is one of the worst in the clubs history. Garbage
Personally think it's a great away kit, very fashionable. Small touches like having the United logo in white adds to the appeal.
It's much better than Arsenal away kit which is one of the worst in the clubs history. Garbage
Don't sell yourself short like that. I think you ll look like a million dollars with a pretty pink bowtie on top.However I can't imagine I'll look anywhere near as cool as Onana if I ever wear it
Mind if I show this to the wife?
Make her jealous!!
Just like the tablecloth. It's destined to be a classic with some titles.
I was only guessing as to why it was different. I'm not saying it is definitely the reasoning, only I can't think of any other reason for it. I may be way off.
Shame that the "fan version" has a cheap looking sponsor patch on the front of the shirt.
"Authentic" version looks amazing. Very cool design, imo.
"Authentic" version looks amazing. Very cool design, imo.
Away Kit in green and white. It has to be somebody's subtle protest against Glazers. They are too dumb and probably never caught it, but if you understand the era from which those colors and stripes are from... I doubt it's accidental No coincidences.
No coincidences.I never thought I'd see a worse away kit than the infamous late 90's grey kit where the players couldn't see each other, but fair play to Adidas they might just have topped it!
We’ve had much worse since then already. The grey kit with the trinity statue on it, last years highlighter green kit, zebra kit, the beige jersey from a couple of years ago are all much worse than this away kit imo.
Forgot all about the Sham Wow kit entirely. Quite the abortion.
yep. That grey Kit is for my money our worst ever kit. It’s forgotten about, rightfully so, but it needs mentioning every time bad kits are brought up. Horrific.
Shake my damn head my head?
If you're talking about the 19-20 away kit then yeah, the shirt colour + the Chevy logo was the ugliest humanly conceivable combination.
That’s the beige kit. The grey kit I mentioned was 17/18 third jersey.
I was gifted the replica version by a friend who went to the game in Houston the other night. Fortunately/Unfortunately, it was too large for me. Went to the local Adidas store and all they had was the authentic version. So much better feel, especially without the ridiculous logo plastic patch, and well worth the extra $50 I paid for it. I'm not a jersey person at all but I love this one and will probably get the 3rd once it comes out, too.
Yes I too wear football shirts at formal events.
"Thank you so much for inviting me to your wedding. Congratulations on your big day. Allow me to introduce my sponsor, Team Viewer."
I like the kit, but that is awful.
They're right though.
That's horrible.
Expect a flurry of people buying this 86 retro design that has been re-released. I always liked it. Back in the day when Jesper Olsen wore it in the 86 world cup.
I've always had a soft spot for Hummel.Expect a flurry of people buying this 86 retro design that has been re-released. I always liked it. Back in the day when Jesper Olsen wore it in the 86 world cup.
The Adidas long-term extension means we'll probably never see a Hummel or Kappa United kit
Who is our marketing team? That is embarrassing.
I've found one and see what they mean. Looks even worse. All I can imagine is that Team Viewer realised they don't have to abide by sponsors logo size rules for friendlies and asked for it to be bigger.
It was the same (sponsor box intruding on white stripes) in the Madrid game too... Silly question, but is it that easy to produce a new shirt (with a larger sponsor) for a few friendlies?
I would have thought it was not. At first I presumed it was a patch over the top of a regular shirt, but it looks like I was wrong. Team Viewer will likely have paid extra for that.
Seems weird for a company who were wanting to get out of the sponsorship deal all together... Just hope this doesn't end up being the actual match-day shirt