AjaxCunian
vexingwijsneus
- Joined
- Mar 10, 2021
- Messages
- 4,607
- Supports
- Ajax & United
Didnt Nike have some of our best ever, our 2007 - 2008 kits.
Adidas are much better, but I'd love Umbro to make a comeback.
Umbro are huge, bigger than Castore and have more Premiership team kit deals.Umbros are almost irrelevant in the upper tiers of football.
The more likely contender will be Castore. Really not sure how they can afford sponsoring some major clubs.
Umbro are huge, bigger than Castore and have more Premiership team kit deals.
Although Castore have Manchester roots so could see them trying to supply City if their deal runs out before United's.
As a Manchester based company, with a history of previously supplying United, they could do it but it would probably be up to United to approach them most likely, and it would involve United keeping most of the sales.Umbros are almost irrelevant in the upper tiers of football.
The more likely contender will be Castore. Really not sure how they can afford sponsoring some major clubs.
Not sure about the Nike ownership,Umbro have Manchester roots, Castore have roots on the Wirral. Anyway aren't Umbro owned by Nike thesedays?
As a Manchester based company, with a history of previously supplying United, they could do it but it would probably be up to United to approach them most likely, and it would involve United keeping most of the sales.
I kinda miss Admiral...
Outside of a few PL kits how are Umbro still going?
You never see Umbro in the shops, it must be one of the most unpopular sports brands going who is wearing Umbro in 2023?
That's because they don't have deals with teams like United anymore. You don't grow without spending big money.I think the boat's sale for umbro. The Umbro annual revenue was $358 million in 2021.
United is way too big for them now.
Why?All I take from this is that the Glazers are (now quite clearly) going nowhere.
The table cloth! New green away kit is a piece of art compared to some of Nike designs.Jesus, people saying that they prefer Nike.
Nike were horrendous. Who could forget the table cloth monstrosity?
United and Adidas. It's the way it should always be.
Talk about the badges peeling off...
10 years is surprising. Will bringing in £90m annually be seen as that much in 2033?
Yer daOutside of a few PL kits how are Umbro still going?
You never see Umbro in the shops, it must be one of the most unpopular sports brands going who is wearing Umbro in 2023?
Are you kidding? That will be enough money to pay 43-year old Jordan Henderson's wages for almost 14 weeks!10 years is surprising. Will bringing in £90m annually be seen as that much in 2033?
It’s minimum 90m and these deals are always 10 years.10 years is surprising. Will bringing in £90m annually be seen as that much in 2033?
There’s a difference between an average criminal wearing a shirt, and an internationally disgraced individual wearing it in front of 100’s of millions of people every week for a club you pay 90 million pounds a year to.Adidas don't get to decide who wears their shirts, if they did you'd need to present your ID and a clean criminal record to buy a shirt.
Boooo fanboy.Feck Nike rubbish
Adidas all the way I like the brand
FuglyThis was my fav United kit:
No there isn’t. What are Adidas going to do if Kim Jong-Un does his next presser in a United shirt while threatening to nuke the states? Adidas have no control over who wears their shirts once it leaves their property. Think about it for just a second and unless we live in 1984 there’s nothing they can do about Greenwood, Ched Evan’s or Adam Johnson wearing one. Just because it’s on TV doesn’t mean anything.There’s a difference between an average criminal wearing a shirt, and an internationally disgraced individual wearing it in front of 100’s of millions of people every week for a club you pay 90 million pounds a year to.
Do you not think they would have spoken to United about this during the contract negotiations? That’s where they can have power over who wears their shirts. They can pull sponsorship from anyone the sponsor if they believe it brings the brand into disrepute.No there isn’t. What are Adidas going to do if Kim Jong-Un does his next presser in a United shirt while threatening to nuke the states? Adidas have no control over who wears their shirts once it leaves their property. Think about it for just a second and unless we live in 1984 there’s nothing they can do about Greenwood, Ched Evan’s or Adam Johnson wearing one. Just because it’s on TV doesn’t mean anything.