DOTA
wants Amber Rudd to call him a naughty boy
What is it? Drama or documentary?Anyone watching Coalition on C4? Pretty good and very well researched.
What is it? Drama or documentary?Anyone watching Coalition on C4? Pretty good and very well researched.
What is it? Drama or documentary?
Sounds worth a visit to 4od at some point.Drama, covering the 5 days after the last election.
YouGov poll ~ Of those who watched the Paxman interviews, 49% say Miliband was best, 34% Cameron.
Getting rid of the NHS will see off the immigrants? That's muslamic raygun talk.I've stayed away from here for a while (mainly due to WW) and work and life, but also because I have found the build up to this election extremely depressing so far. It's started to get a bit American election style. I've also been really annoyed at the amount of people coming in to my pub that are openly supporting UKIP. We have a general rule and that's to not allow talk on Religion or Politics in the pub, but some tosser was banging his drum the other night. He actually said he would be happy to lose the NHS if it meant getting rid of all the immigrants, a few seemed to agree with him too. I was lost for words, and kept quiet or else I might have regretted my retort. He was also moaning about a proposal for new affordable housing in our area, despite it now being about 45-50% holiday homes and all houses are completely unaffordable to local families.
Now I come here and see the UKIP vote is up to 16.
Getting rid of the NHS will see off the immigrants? That's muslamic raygun talk.
He seems to have ended up in an argument with Stan Colleymore and then posted this
Don't blame you. Some people can't be reasoned with and it's a waste of breath trying.I know. they were happy to vote UKIP even if it meant privatising the NHS, because UKIP will rid the country of those bloody foreigners!
I kept quiet.
Essentially due to the effectiveness of Tory PR.Well, Collymore was schooling him tbf. So an ad hominem retort seems the only way he can come back.
I'm really baffled by people thinking we'd go backwards under Labour, as much as I am unsure of them, I'm positive this privatisation of the NHS would either not be as "bad" or not happen at all. Although I'm kidding myself on the latter I reckon. We're already going backwards with Cameron and his little bitch Clegg, so what's the point in switching your vote?
They've demonised those on welfare and the poor so effectively, that most of the reasons I have heard of people switching is because of "scroungers". We have an entire bloody government of scroungers, does anyone even remember the expenses scandal?Essentially due to the effectiveness of Tory PR.
It's disgusting how this has been allowed to happen.They've demonised those on welfare and the poor so effectively, that most of the reasons I have heard of people switching is because of "scroungers".
Socially, they have dragged us back to the Victorian era. Although that was started by Thatcher really. Just unbelievable how people have lapped up this undeserving/deserving poor bullshit, I thought we'd moved past that in the 50s...It's disgusting how this has been allowed to happen.
Better one by David Mitchell.
Or the experiences of the last Labour administration...Essentially due to the effectiveness of Tory PR.
Did we never have zero hours contracts under Labour? Has 'almost all' of the employment growth come from these? Check the figures.Cameron and his government are a joke, he's actually made this country even worse which is some feat I guess. I was actually shocked at the amount of people relying on food banks and quite frankly that is unacceptable in a country as "wealthy" as this. Also I hate it when Torries bang on about increasing employment when mostly that is down to zero hours contracts which doesn't really help the majority of people who have families to support and bills to pay.
Nope, pretty much still the PR.Or the experiences of the last Labour administration...
Did we never have zero hours contracts under Labour? Has 'almost all' of the employment growth come from these? Check the figures.
How has this government 'made it worse' and what would Labour have done better. They promised 'no more boom and bust' remember?
Dyed in the wool Labour voters make me laugh. It's long been a party of lawyers lapping up your union money while laughing in your face as they cosy up to big business.
Ask why Rachel Reeves said Labour 'is not the party of benefit claimants' and why the Institute of Public Policy Research queried Labour's planned 'punitive benefit cuts on the young jobless'.
http://www.theguardian.com/commenti...ons-for-cameron-and-miliband-armando-iannucci
Maybe 'awkward and weird' won't stop red ed. Do Labour not have pr for the bacon-gobbler?Nope, pretty much still the PR.
Clement Attlee began as a lawyer, as it happens. Probably wouldn't have been elected these days, too awkward and weird.
Nope, pretty much still the PR.
Clement Attlee began as a lawyer, as it happens. Probably wouldn't have been elected these days, too awkward and weird.
Nope, that's Cameron's field of expertise unfortunately.Maybe 'awkward and weird' won't stop red ed. Do Labour not have pr for the bacon-gobbler?
for all the talk of austerity because of our debt maybe we should take a leaf our of Attlee's book.
I'm really baffled by people thinking we'd go backwards under Labour,
as much as I am unsure of them, I'm positive this privatisation of the NHS would either not be as "bad" or not happen at all. Although I'm kidding myself on the latter I reckon.
You looked at the political response to the flooding in Somerset and felt Labour were the ones who looked bad? Cameron was absolutely slated by his own supporters for failing to act quickly enough.There are also the little things too, i recall that during the floods on the Somerset Levels not a single senior Labour figure was present.
You looked at the political response to the flooding in Somerset and felt Labour were the ones who looked bad? Cameron was absolutely slated by his own supporters for failing to act quickly enough.
I'm rather sceptical of the idea that because they began to say the right things and put on their wellies when they realised they were becoming deeply unpopular in the area one can say they cared more about the issue than Labour.Indeed he was, and most deservedly so.
Although whereas i suspect that some of the Tories/Lib Dems were genuinely concerned about the flooding, i very much doubt if the Labour shadow cabinet cared one iota (their response being indicative of such).
DiseaseOfTheAge said:He (Miliband) is willing to contribute to the demonising of immigrants, when it suits. Same with those on benefits.
David Cameron last night ruled out taking part in a head-to-head television debate with Ed Miliband before the general election.
The prime minister has instead offered to participate in a single television debate that would take place in three weeks’ time.
He will appear only if it includes the leaders of the seven biggest parties, including the SNP, Greens and Ukip, Craig Oliver, his director of communications, said last night.
"In thirty eight days’ time you face a stark choice,” he will say. The next Prime Minister walking through that door will be me or Ed Milliband.
What a bizarre analysis. Labour aren't awkward and bumbling over the EU - that's the Tories who know full well leaving the EU would be an economic disaster but continue to flirt with exit to pander to their right wingers and UKIP voters.ETA:Labour has apparently trodden on several sets of toes in the business community today. Rather unprofessional of the campaign team.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/pol...f-Britains-biggest-companies-over-advert.html
Why they are so awkward and bumbling when it comes to the EU i have no idea, even the Greens hold a more honest position.
Cameron said:"In thirty eight days’ time you face a stark choice,” he will say. The next Prime Minister walking through that door will be me or Ed Milliband.