You really expected all dutch, belgian and french teams to pass while 4 out of 8 teams eliminated are from Spain, Italy and Germany?
While it was obvious from the start that some of the teams would have been eliminated I really didn't expect Club Brugge or all french teams to pass (with Lille in top8).
I think it was ok, the only problem I see is that 24 passing out of 36 is a bit too much, made worse by the fact that placing 9th or 24th is pratically the same.
It would have been more exciting if the playoff would have been a single match at the home of the better placed team, it would have made the position more important.
I'd have pegged those teams as being reasonably likely to be eliminated yes. Also, it's 4 from 12, not 8.
Germany and Italy had an extra qualifier each because of the coefficient thing, and neither are particularly strong leagues in 2025 anyway. Then when you look at the eliminated teams - Girona, RB Leipzig, Bologna and Stuttgart - it hardly screams "European pedigree".
Then you look at previous Champions Leagues:
2023-24 - United, Sevilla, Union Berlin and Newcastle all finished bottom of their groups, Milan dropped into the Europa League.
2022-23 - Atletico Madrid finished bottom of their group, Bayer Leverkusen, Barcelona, Sevilla and Juventus all dropped into the Europa League.
2021-22 - Milan and Woflsburg finished bottom of their group, RB Leipzig, Dortmund, Barcelona, Atalanta and Sevilla all dropped into the Europa League.
17 of 48 teams eliminated at the group stage were from the typical "big 4" nations.
As for the "all Dutch, Belgian and French" teams bit, also a chance there, considering only 12 went out and there's teams from Croatia, Serbia, Austria (two of them!), Czech Republic, Slovenia and Switzerland in there, as well as Shakhtar Donetsk who were playing their home games in Germany.
I think it's a crap, diluted format. However, it might be slightly better if it were 1-12 qualifying for the last 16, then 13-20 competing in the playoffs for the final 4 spots.