ivaldo
Mediocre Horse Whisperer, s'up wid chew?
- Joined
- Nov 15, 2012
- Messages
- 28,725
Do we need to start calling him LVH now?Yup. "We have been told it is van Gaal" Amateurs at MUTV
Do we need to start calling him LVH now?Yup. "We have been told it is van Gaal" Amateurs at MUTV
Wicked ride, that.close! its called Valhalla .
Do we need to start calling him LVH now?
Even 11m is ridiculous, Hernandez a year ago would have gone for 20-25m easy. With the marketing that comes with him being an excellent player, 11m would be a steal.
Why would we need to do that? There is no confusion about how to spell his name
Even 11m is ridiculous, Hernandez a year ago would have gone for 20-25m easy. With the marketing that comes with him being an excellent player, 11m would be a steal.
Agree with the first comment, although I think we could get anywhere from £10-16m dependent on how we played it.It's hilarious that some of you think Chicharito is worth 20m plus.
He's a second string striker worth around 10-12m tops.
He had one good season only.
I think he could easily go for 20m if a big club was in desperate need of a striker. In saying that, I agree, I can only see him going for around 10m.It's hilarious that some of you think Chicharito is worth 20m plus.
He's a second string striker worth around 10-12m tops.
He had one good season only.
He scored 20, 12, 18 and 9 goals in the last four years competing with Rooney, RvP and Welbeck and don't forget Berbatov for the place in the first team.It's hilarious that some of you think Chicharito is worth 20m plus.
He's a second string striker worth around 10-12m tops.
He had one good season only.
Its a United thing, you can bet your House that If Hernandez was for example a Porto player, he wouldn't leave for cheaper than 20m Euros.
It's hilarious that some of you think Chicharito is worth 20m plus.
He's a second string striker worth around 10-12m tops.
He had one good season only.
In a market where Ross bloody McCormack is worth 11m and Mitroglou is worth 12m. In a market where a player like David Luiz goes for 50m to PSG but would have gone for 40m elsewhere, Hernandez is worth at least 20m, if not 25m+.
He is Mexico's third all time top scorer, is only 26 and is about to reach his peak, has won the champions league and has an insane goal to game ratio.
Maybe 5 years ago he would not be worth that much but today, he definitely is.
He is also worth a lot more than that to us. Now that LVG is going to play a 2 striker system, we will need the quality of a player like Hernandez when either/both RVP and Rooney get injured.
Indeed. I've always found supporters' assessments of Hernandez and his worth to be very inflated. His goal scoring record is excellent but the reality is that top tier, and even second tier clubs in the mould of Everton and co, want something that little bit more.
His all round game remains a problem, despite his movement and positioning inside the penalty box. He's a decent player, but not much more.
Having said all that, I'd like to see a little bit more than what Fulham paid for Ross bloody McCormack. Hernandez is a £15-20 million footballer in this mad market. The stumbling block is that he's been short of matches and form for a good while.
In a market where Ross bloody McCormack is worth 11m and Mitroglou is worth 12m. In a market where a player like David Luiz goes for 50m to PSG but would have gone for 40m elsewhere, Hernandez is worth at least 20m, if not 25m+.
He is Mexico's third all time top scorer, is only 26 and is about to reach his peak, has won the champions league and has an insane goal to game ratio.
Maybe 5 years ago he would not be worth that much but today, he definitely is.
He is also worth a lot more than that to us. Now that LVG is going to play a 2 striker system, we will need the quality of a player like Hernandez when either/both RVP and Rooney get injured.
I must have missed that one!
He scored 20, 12, 18 and 9 goals in the last four years competing with Rooney, RvP and Welbeck and don't forget Berbatov for the place in the first team.
For example Morata who was €20m scored 2 and 9 goals in the last two years competing with Benzema for the place in the first team.
Lukaku who was sold for £30m didn't get a chance for a team with Torres, Ba an Eto'o.
Yes Hernandez is older than other two but he scored 20 goals at the age of 22 when he had a chance to play as a started for almost whole season. If he goes to a club like Juve where he will be a striker he will be scoring a lot of goals and his price will massively icreased .
In a market where Ross bloody McCormack is worth 11m and Mitroglou is worth 12m. In a market where a player like David Luiz goes for 50m to PSG but would have gone for 40m elsewhere, Hernandez is worth at least 20m, if not 25m+.
He is Mexico's third all time top scorer, is only 26 and is about to reach his peak, has won the champions league and has an insane goal to game ratio.
Maybe 5 years ago he would not be worth that much but today, he definitely is.
He is also worth a lot more than that to us. Now that LVG is going to play a 2 striker system, we will need the quality of a player like Hernandez when either/both RVP and Rooney get injured.
Borini - 14M
Chico £8M?
He's must be worth £20M in this market.
5 years of extra service.What does Lukaku offer that Hernandez does not?
5 years of extra service.
He actually only turned 26 in June.A poacher like him easily has another 7-8 years left.But we all have seen Chicharito regress, whether it be his own "fault" or due to lack of opportunities these past 2 years doesn't really matter - he hasn't done as well. Once Van Persie came to us you knew he was going to be a super sub at best - we should have moved him then if we wanted the optimal return. Easy to say in hindsight of course........
As for Morata and Lukaku, well I would argue that the latter has done more at a younger age already and that the former as well as the latter have both been highly rated for at least 3 years now. Chicharito was considered an unearthed gem after scoring 20 in his first season, but had never previously been considered a great prospect as the other two were.
Whilst the market is mad at the moment, one might be forgiven for thinking we could get more than 15m for him, but this is United moving a player who is not crucial to our plans and soon to be 27 years old. 10-12m is realistic in my opinion.
All that said, frankly,if he's happy to keep playing the super sub role, I'd much rather keep him.
Let's not be facetious here. Lukaku has the age advantage whilst also being on the same talent level as Hernandez.By that logic every 18 year old would be more expensive than Messi, as they have 9 more years of service.
Thomas Vermaelen inches closer to Man Utd after refusing new contract at Arsenal