He was never an £8 million player. He was Standard Liege's best performer against Liverpool in the Champions League a few ago, outshining the Caf's favourite son Steven Defour twice in the two legs.
Nonsense to suggest that Fellaini was ever only worth less than £10 million.
Exactly if we sell him for around £15M he will have cost us nearly £1M per start. For Fellaini! Which of our transfers is worse than that?He is genuinely up there with our worst signings, he cost close to £30 million and contributed nothing but anguish.
In other words; we don't give a feck about 'i don't need to prove myself to anyone' fellaini, as long as he's sold, but care for even a snippet of info regarding Vidal, who we dearly care about
How many starts did Bebe have? How much did he cost, was it £5m?Exactly if we sell him for around £15M he will have cost us nearly £1M per start. For Fellaini! Which of our transfers is worse than that?
Makes sense, pretty sure we'll achieve this personally.Ouch
Ouch
look at it the other wayExactly if we sell him for around £15M he will have cost us nearly £1M per start. For Fellaini! Which of our transfers is worse than that?
You do realise he cost a bomb? This is what stands him out from the likes of Bellion. He was one of our worst transfers ever, if not the worst, simple as.I'm far from a Fellaini fan, but you are being overly harsh here considering:
- He didn't set the fee, Moyes/Woodward managed to feck up the signing to the degree that we bought him after his release clause went up around 5m, because we were trying to be clever and get Baines at the same time
- He was bought to play in a position that isn't his best, in a team where the players around him couldn't cover for his shortcomings there as last season we were awful in that area of the pitch to a man
- Was never going to be played in his most effective position, as we have actual world class (or near world class at least) players who would all start ahead of him there (Rooney, Mata, Kagawa, Januzaj to name a few)
- Was injured when we bought him, and missed much of the second half of the season due to a necessary operation
- Played in one of the worst performing sides that we have had in the PL era, and despite hardly featuring was made a scapegoat for our lowest ever PL finish
- Actually played quite well in some of the games he started for us, certainly not being the worst player on the pitch in any of them, and didn't really get the opportunity to have a decent run of games to try and hit any kind of form.
Yes, it was a poor signing, and was disappointing for us all, but a worse signing than the likes of Kleberson, Dong, Bebe, Obertan, Djemba Djemba, Bellion, Veron, or even the incredibly disappointing Anderson? No chance. Not even close.
That makes him the one of the best substitute strikers in the league not one of the best strikers in he league. He's not even close to the level of Van Persie or Aguero so it's exactly as controversial as it looks.Its not as controversial a point as it looks.
If you needed a goal and you had to bank on someone in this league, he'd be high on my list too. It just so happens we are blessed with great forwards in RVP and Rooney. Hernandez's all round play is not as good as others, however, as a goalscorer he's quality.
What a stupid thing to say. Do you really need it breaking down to you as to why he's obviously a worse signing than Dong, Kleberson, Bebe, Djemba and Obertan? Do you not see an obvious common factor there? They were relatively cheap, and we made money off loaning Bebe out. What a moronic thing to compare them without factoring in the fee we paid, he's our fourth most expensive player of all time FFS.Yes, it was a poor signing, and was disappointing for us all, but a worse signing than the likes of Kleberson, Dong, Bebe, Obertan, Djemba Djemba, Bellion, Veron, or even the incredibly disappointing Anderson? No chance. Not even close.
Seriously only way Liverpool could get him was if we were not in for him.That cnut peter spencer is saying Liverpool are hijacking the Vidal deal
Yes, it was a poor signing, and was disappointing for us all, but a worse signing than the likes of Kleberson, Dong, Bebe, Obertan, Djemba Djemba, Bellion, Veron, or even the incredibly disappointing Anderson? No chance. Not even close.
As @KiD MoYeS said, there's absolutely no comparison between those players and Fellaini. Most of them cost peanuts and the likes of veron were on a different level altogether. I reckon Fellaini's actually been worse than kleberson too, who wasn't that bad really. He just wasn't very good and was out of place. Fellaini has been awful so far. Absolutely awful. And he cost a bomb. Horrible signing.I'm far from a Fellaini fan, but you are being overly harsh here considering:
- He didn't set the fee, Moyes/Woodward managed to feck up the signing to the degree that we bought him after his release clause went up around 5m, because we were trying to be clever and get Baines at the same time
- He was bought to play in a position that isn't his best, in a team where the players around him couldn't cover for his shortcomings there as last season we were awful in that area of the pitch to a man
- Was never going to be played in his most effective position, as we have actual world class (or near world class at least) players who would all start ahead of him there (Rooney, Mata, Kagawa, Januzaj to name a few)
- Was injured when we bought him, and missed much of the second half of the season due to a necessary operation
- Played in one of the worst performing sides that we have had in the PL era, and despite hardly featuring was made a scapegoat for our lowest ever PL finish
- Actually played quite well in some of the games he started for us, certainly not being the worst player on the pitch in any of them, and didn't really get the opportunity to have a decent run of games to try and hit any kind of form.
Yes, it was a poor signing, and was disappointing for us all, but a worse signing than the likes of Kleberson, Dong, Bebe, Obertan, Djemba Djemba, Bellion, Veron, or even the incredibly disappointing Anderson? No chance. Not even close.
Vidal won't go to Liverpool but if he was to it'd spell the end of Woodward.
What a weird post.Vidal won't go to Liverpool but if he was to it'd spell the end of Woodward.
What a weird reply to a non weird post.What a weird post.
Right yeah, Woodward will be sacked if a player we might not even be after joins another club.What a weird reply to a non weird post.
If you don't believe fans would turn against Woodword to devastating effect then okay...Right yeah, Woodward will be sacked if a player we might not even be after joins another club.
You mean like they did last summer? Since when do the owners give a shit what the fans think?If you don't believe fans would turn against Woodword to devastating effect then okay...
We'll agree to disagree. If Woodword fails to deliver this summer then he's fecked, that's my opinion and you don't have to share it.You mean like they did last summer? Since when do the owners give a shit what the fans think?
Fans might turn against Woodward for sure but the work he is doing on commercial deals would mean he's probably untouchable in the eyes of the Glazers.If you don't believe fans would turn against Woodword to devastating effect then okay...