Twitter Discussion [Archive]

Status
Not open for further replies.
Absolutely useless post. This guy is a known bullshitter who sucks up to Tancredi. We banned one, why not ban the other too?

What are you talking about? He translate Di Marzio's articles, and has feck all to do with Tancredi. :wenger:
 
To be fair at least Young looks like he gives a feck at times. Nani hasn't looked arsed for about 3 years, on the occasions he's been fit. If Young's willing to give his best LvG will appreciate that and i can see him sticking around.

I agree and Nani hasn't been any good for a couple of years anyway. People say he's inconsistent but he's been consistently average for some time now. Young is average too but like you said, he always looks to put in a shift.
 
What are you talking about? He translate Di Marzio's articles, and has feck all to do with Tancredi. :wenger:
He was saying why wasn't Tancredi recognized on Twitter or why he still doesn't have a tick mark? Something along those lines. And translator? Like there is no one else who can translate?
 
Fellaini will be with is next season I'm afraid. What a monumental feck up that was. £27m :lol:

He'd be perfect for Stoke or West ham, but I doubt anyone would pay his wages, same dilemma with Young
 
I don't know. With these departures I think defenders and a central midfielder will be the more immediate priority.

I would have certainly presumed that as well. But from that interview, he only mentioned forwards. So I would definitely expect him to buy another winger.
 
Fellaini will be with is next season I'm afraid. What a monumental feck up that was. £27m :lol:

He'd be perfect for Stoke or West ham, but I doubt anyone would pay his wages, same dilemma with Young

With this rumour, I think at the very least Fellaini is heading out on loan, whether it be Napoli or someone else.
 
He was saying why wasn't Tancredi recognized on Twitter or why he still doesn't have a tick mark? Something along those lines. And translator? Like there is no one else who can translate?
He was taking the piss out of Tancredi.
 
He was saying why wasn't Tancredi recognized on Twitter or why he still doesn't have a tick mark? Something along those lines. And translator? Like there is no one else who can translate?

I think he was being sarcastic for a start.

Yeah there are others who can translate, there is more than one on their "team" who translates Di Marzio stuff.

 


These kind of tweets just highlight how little the media truly know about our transfer plans. Twisting comments to make a story just to bide time until the next 'exclusive'.

LVG is giving nothing away and the journos hate it.
 
He's right. We overloaded with number 10s and really short in defence and CM.

We a few injuries away from playing midfielders in defence.
 
When exactly is he supposed to have said that? Bollox.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/fo...aal-says-he-has-inherited-a-broken-squad.html

"No," Van Gaal said when asked whether following Ferguson would have been harder.

"I don't agree. I had to follow Bobby Robson at Barcelona the year after he won three titles and there wasn't a problem [Van Gaal won the league that year].

"When there is success you have a very good squad, and now I have to follow and the squad was broken I think.

"When you look at the squad, there is quality. There is [Wayne] Rooney, [Robin] van Persie, [Javier] Hernandez, [Danny] Welbeck, but you also see Juan Mata, [Marouane] Fellaini, and you see [Ander] Herrera. There are a lot of players that can play in the same position.

"It is not in balance. It's more difficult to succeed in a difficult situation than in a fantastic situation."
 
He's clearly assessed what the problems are then. So let's get buying.
 
If he sees Herrera as an attacking mid then who are we going to play in central midfield? And why did he let the deal for him go through?

The "broken" bit is more likely about our confidence.
 
"It is understood that the future looks similarly bleak for Japanese international Shinji Kagawa and other bit-part players Anderson, Wilfried Zaha and Nani."
 
Well then why did he agree to the purchase of Herrera. Should have went for Kroos instead.

Because Kroos was Real Madrid bound.

We didn't reject Kroos. Once Madrid came in for him we made a story to save face.
 
Because Kroos was Real Madrid bound.

We didn't reject Kroos. Once Madrid came in for him we made a story to save face.
I actually have to disagree. We had chances to sign him after the end of the season but we waited for God knows what reason and then by the time the WC came, it was too late and THEN we had to save face. It wasn't like that from the start in my opinion.
 
I assumed the 'broken' part refers to the players confidence. From what I've seen of the Tour it looks like this is beginning to be repaired.
Hard to tell as the context suggests two differen things, the preceeding that Moyes fecked up the confidence and the following that it's a poorly designed squad with too much of some things and too little of others. Neither are miles off. Listening to the actual interview would make it a bit easier.

Well then why did he agree to the purchase of Herrera. Should have went for Kroos instead.
Herrera's brilliant and can play deeper with no problem at all, he just mentioned him to give an example of the numbers that can play in the number 10 position. Kroos under Van Gaal played as a number ten, and I seem to remember that according to some Bayern fans on here, he didn't much like him there.
 
Well then why did he agree to the purchase of Herrera. Should have went for Kroos instead.

If he sees Herrera as an attacking mid then who are we going to play in central midfield? And why did he let the deal for him go through?

I think he just means that Herrera can play there. He'll be using him as a box to box midfielder, like in the friendlies.
 
After latest talks, a deal with Liverpool on centre back Daniel Agger (29) is close. Barcelona would pay 15M for the Danish defender [sport]
 
Pretty sure he said our squad lacked several world class players. Van Gaals done the opposite and criticised the balance of the squad, not the players themselves. There's a pretty large difference.
Also Moyes was pretty critical of the squad when we had just won the league with the same exact squad. Also he didn't have any fecking right to complain in the first place because he had three months to improve our God damn squad and didn't do squat about it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.