Bojan11
Full Member
- Joined
- May 16, 2010
- Messages
- 33,383
That's a lot of money assuming its true. Rather buy a CB and a CM.
What makes you say we won't buy those too?
That's a lot of money assuming its true. Rather buy a CB and a CM.
What makes you say we won't buy those too?
The article says Nike have made big inroads into Adidas' market share. Would make sense for the deal to be worth more to Adidas if so.Its withdrawal is expected to clear the way for the club to sign a lucrative new deal with German sportswear company Adidas.
I think it's all a bit complicated, I mean do we spend big chunk of our transfer on a midfielder Vidal/Pogba OR we sign someone like Di Maria/Sanchez to add to our attacking unit. I would like to sort our midfield with a top signing rather then add to our attack. Unless we going after young players which we fans don't know of and sign some young midfielder/CB and winger.That's a lot of money assuming its true. Rather buy a CB and a CM.
We just replaced oir previous one a few weeks ago.
I think it's all a bit complicated, I mean do we spend big chunk of our transfer on a midfielder Vidal/Pogba OR we sign someone like Di Maria/Sanchez to add to our attacking unit. I would like to sort our midfield with a top signing rather then add to our attack. Unless we going after young players which we fans don't know of and sign some young midfielder/CB and winger.
The article says Nike have made big inroads into Adidas' market share. Would make sense for the deal to be worth more to Adidas if so.
I assume he means "let's get a CB and CM in first to calm anxious fans"What makes you say we won't buy those too?
There are reasons to suggest we could put in a sustained title challenge, so I hope your belief is founded. We have a number of factors in our favour which you've quite rightly pointed out. We now have a competent manager who is accustomed to winning and Liverpool demonstrated the positive implications of missing out on European football last season with a title challenge.Even more so the reason I took exception with the statement of United being "too far behind Chelsea". As you say there are a multitude of intangibles that go beyond just squad strength. Might be wrong here but I genuinely believe we'll challenge for the title next season and not just set the bar too low by aiming for CL qualification. Again you're correct in the sense that everything above and beyond that will be a bonus. But Van Gaal is a winner and he's not accustomed to settling. I expect that mentality to rub off on our players. I'm just saturated with hearing the common narrative of our players being subpar or deficient compared to our rivals. It's not a perfect squad but they seldom are.
Afaik, Uniteds twitter account isnt locked.
One thing is certain. If Woodward is targeting a marquee, luxury signing, it should be a wide player like di Maria or Sanchez and not Cavani. It is an area we will need to address sooner rather than later and it would be a far more beneficial signing than if Ed was to pursue Cavani like a lot of outlets still report.I think it's all a bit complicated, I mean do we spend big chunk of our transfer on a midfielder Vidal/Pogba OR we sign someone like Di Maria/Sanchez to add to our attacking unit. I would like to sort our midfield with a top signing rather then add to our attack. Unless we going after young players which we fans don't know of and sign some young midfielder/CB and winger.
I'll be sad to see Nike go after they helped us bring Ronaldo back all those times.
Help me, Adidas. You're my only hope.
Help me, Adidas. You're my only hope.
I don't know much about formations, I think Wellbeck/januzaj and Valencia/Kagawa as backup can be a decent option for the wings. Not world class but they can be effective. So yeah I agree with you, hopefully we will sort the midfield issue first.One thing is certain. If Woodward is targeting a marquee, luxury signing, it should be a wide player like di Maria or Sanchez and not Cavani. It is an area we will need to address sooner rather than later and it would be a far more beneficial signing than if Ed was to pursue Cavani like a lot of outlets still report.
A centre back and central midfielder are key though. Probably the only 'critical areas' in our squad that definitely have to be addressed this summer. You could make a case for a wide player and right back being needed, but that could probably wait.
Woodward would prefer the brand splashing the most cash.I'm 100% sure that Adidas will get the deal. Adidas is in an eternal battle for global domination with Nike. There's no bigger prize in the world of football than Manchester United.
Warrior, of course, is trying it's very best to break into the Europe. That said, We would prefer Adidas over Warrior simply because we've had a history with them, and we've seen just how terrible Warrior kits can be!
Why?That sucks. Money aside, Nike is better for the Manchester United brand.
That sucks. Money aside, Nike is better for the Manchester United brand.
Adidas is good enough for Real Madrid and Bayern Munich. They'll be just as good, if not better than Nike, for the United brand.That sucks. Money aside, Nike is better for the Manchester United brand.
Or maybe we are going big on Di Maria instead of a super midfield signing.One thing is certain. If Woodward is targeting a marquee, luxury signing, it should be a wide player like di Maria or Sanchez and not Cavani. It is an area we will need to address sooner rather than later and it would be a far more beneficial signing than if Ed was to pursue Cavani like a lot of outlets still report.
A centre back and central midfielder are key though. Probably the only 'critical areas' in our squad that definitely have to be addressed this summer. You could make a case for a wide player and right back being needed, but that could probably wait.
Is Fila still about?It's a big blow for Nike. Arsenal are now with Puma, Liverpool with Warrior, Chelsea with Adidas and we'll be with another brand soon.
Nike's biggest client in England is City, who (I'm guessing...) sell nowhere near as many shirts as the above clubs.
It's a big blow for Nike. Arsenal are now with Puma, Liverpool with Warrior, Chelsea with Adidas and we'll be with another brand soon.
Nike's biggest client in England is City, who (I'm guessing...) sell nowhere near as many shirts as the above clubs.
I hope we keep Nike.
Well we have attacking players who can thrive in a wing position in the right system like Kagawa on the left of a fluid, interchanging three or Welbeck as a left wide-forward. I still think we could do with another pacy and penetrative winger however, as that was sorely lacking last season and all of our wingers besides Januzaj are more or less useless.I don't know much about formations, I think Wellbeck/januzaj and Valencia/Kagawa as backup can be a decent option for the wings. Not world class but they can be effective. So yeah I agree with you, hopefully we will sort the midfield issue first.
Or maybe we are going big on Di Maria instead of a super midfield signing.
I guess Tom agrees with us.
I hope we keep Nike.
It's a big blow for Nike. Arsenal are now with Puma, Liverpool with Warrior, Chelsea with Adidas and we'll be with another brand soon.
Nike's biggest client in England is City, who (I'm guessing...) sell nowhere near as many shirts as the above clubs.
That sucks. Money aside, Nike is better for the Manchester United brand.