bucky
Full Member
- Joined
- Apr 5, 2011
- Messages
- 9,710
Seeing how quick we can get to 2000 pages.why are the pages moving so quickly when buggar all is happening?!
If that pic is real, and Woodward is in Madrid, yet comes home empty-handed... YEESH!
If that pic is real, and Woodward is in Madrid, yet comes home empty-handed... YEESH!
It's an old photo. Not even sure if it was taken at Madrid airport.
It's an old photo. Not even sure if it was taken at Madrid airport.
\Mods, can we please add Matt Davies to the blacklist?
But 50M for him wouldn't be paying over the odds IMO.Its not stupid if it comes off. Madrid have replaced Di Maria before they've actually sold him and the other main competitior doesnt look like being able to get a deal done. While the club needs to act quickly to bring players in, those in charge wont want to pay over the odds for fear of looking like a soft touch and seeing prices get hiked - either in the last few weeks of this window or later on.
If the club are seen to blow £70 plus million on one player this week, that'll add significant sums to other players they might want to bring in next week.
Its high risk, for certain and if it doesnt come off then Woodward, in particular will be the man who's neck is on the line in terms of the fans opinions of him.
Know-nothing spoofer, PLEASE stop posting
Tune in to MUTV from 18:30 BST tonight for United In Press, a weekly review of the newspapers with the Sunday Times' Jonathan Northcroft, the Daily Mirror's David McDonnell and United We Stand fanzine editor Andy Mitten.
Might get some info there.
Thanks for the updateThis thread managed to move on nine or ten pages since I last looked at it at work (around 2.00 ish) and I really thought I must have missed something but no... nothing.
This thread managed to move on nine or ten pages since I last looked at it at work (around 2.00 ish) and I really thought I must have missed something but no... nothing.
This thread managed to move on nine or ten pages since I last looked at it at work (around 2.00 ish) and I really thought I must have missed something but no... nothing.
He wasn't on the blacklist. So I posted it. It's so hard to keep up with people's sensibilities in here. Ban this guy, don't ban that one. Can't take any discussion on the matter seriously when we still allow tossers like Duncan Castles to be posted. And why is Pilib de Brun blacklisted? because he's emotional? Gives good info and loves the club from what I can tell. This whole post wasn't directed at you, just quoted you because it was relevant.
Its Manchester airport
Tune in to MUTV from 18:30 BST tonight for United In Press, a weekly review of the newspapers with the Sunday Times' Jonathan Northcroft, the Daily Mirror's David McDonnell and United We Stand fanzine editor Andy Mitten.
Might get some info there.
I'm speaking with my conspiracy theory hat on, but I get the feeling that de Brún isn't liked here is because he's had a pop at the Caf' a few times on his Twitter account (something about being banned).
I've followed him a long while now and I have to say that I think he's a genuine guy who, admittedly, gets too emotionally involved in some United topics. He has solid contacts, however, and many (like a favourite son of the Caf', Daniel Taylor) vouch for him.
As you said, too, can't see the issue with de Brún when tossers like Jackson and Castles, two known anti-United journalists who regular paint us in bad light, are lapped up here.
Any Updates so far ?
Just rivered in.
Any Updates so far ?
Just rivered in.
Because anything bad is taken as gospel here for some bizarre reason.I'm speaking with my conspiracy theory hat on, but I get the feeling that de Brún isn't liked here is because he's had a pop at the Caf' a few times on his Twitter account (something about being banned).
I've followed him a long while now and I have to say that I think he's a genuine guy who, admittedly, gets too emotionally involved in some United topics. He has solid contacts, however, and many (like a favourite son of the Caf', Daniel Taylor) vouch for him.
As you said, too, can't see the issue with de Brún when tossers like Jackson and Castles, two known anti-United journalists who regular paint us in bad light, are lapped up here.
He's a Times journalist, why the feck would he be banned? Matt Davies doesn't even exist, one of the many 12 year olds on twitter pretending to work in the media.He wasn't on the blacklist. So I posted it. It's so hard to keep up with people's sensibilities in here. Ban this guy, don't ban that one. Can't take any discussion on the matter seriously when we still allow tossers like Duncan Castles to be posted. And why is Pilib de Brun blacklisted? because he's emotional? Gives good info and loves the club from what I can tell. This whole post wasn't directed at you, just quoted you because it was relevant.